Vogtle - AppendixR.com
Vogtle - AppendixR.com
Vogtle - AppendixR.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11<br />
4. OTHER ACTIVITIES<br />
4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems<br />
a. Inspection Scope<br />
The inspectors reviewed condition reports resulting from fire, smoke, sparks, arcing, and<br />
equipment overheating incidents for the period of July 31, 2001 to July 19, 2004 as well<br />
as selected fire brigade response, emergency / incidents, and fire safety inspection<br />
reports. This review was conducted to assess the frequency of fire incidents and<br />
effectiveness of the fire prevention program and any maintenance-related or material<br />
condition problems related to fire incidents. The inspectors also reviewed other<br />
corrective action program documents, including <strong>com</strong>pleted corrective actions<br />
documented in selected CRs, and operating experience program (OEP) documents to<br />
verify that industry-identified fire protection problems potentially or actually affecting<br />
VEGP were appropriately entered into, and resolved by, the corrective action program<br />
process. Items included in the OEP effectiveness review were NRC Information<br />
Notices, industry or vendor-generated reports of defects and non<strong>com</strong>pliance under 10<br />
CFR Part 21, and vendor information letters. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a<br />
sample of the fire protection program audits and self-assessments which the licensee<br />
performed in the previous two-year period. The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness<br />
of the corrective actions for the identified issues. The documents reviewed are listed in<br />
the attachment.<br />
b. Findings<br />
No findings of significance were identified.<br />
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit<br />
On August 26, 2004, the lead inspector presented the inspection results to<br />
Mr. W. Kitchens and other members of his staff who acknowledged the findings. The<br />
licensee confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or examined during the<br />
inspection. Following <strong>com</strong>pletion of additional review in the Region II office, a final exit<br />
was held by telephone with Mr. K. Holmes on September 20, 2004, to provide an update<br />
on changes to the preliminary inspection findings. The licensee acknowledged the<br />
findings.