meeting agenda of the planning commission - City of Jurupa Valley

MEETING AGENDA
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Wednesday, November 7,2012
Time: 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA
A. As a courlesy lo Ihose in attendance, we ask Ihal cell phones be lurned off or sel lo Iheir
silenl mode and Ihal you keep lalking lo a minimum so Ihal all persons can hear Ihe
commenls of Ihe public and Planning Commission.
B. A member of Ihe public who wishes lo speak under Public Commenls musl fill oul a
"Speaker Card" and submil il lo Ihe Cily Slaff BEFORE Ihe Chairman ca lis for Public
Commenls on an agenda ilem. Each agenda ilem up will be open for public commenls
before laking action. Public commenls on subjecls Ihal are nol on Ihe agenda can be made
during Ihe "Public Appearance/Commenls" porlion of Ihe agenda.
C. If you wish lo address Ihe Planning Commission on a specific agenda ilem or during public
commenl, please fill oul a speaker card and hand il lo Ihe Clerk wilh your na me and address
before Ihe ilem is called so Ihal we can call you lo come lo Ihe podium for your commenls.
While lisling your name and address is nol required, il helps us lo provide follow-up
informalion lo you if needed.
D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an
opportunity to speak, please limil your comments lo 3 minutes.
1. Call to Order and RolI Call for Open Session
• Matthew Burris
• Kim Johnson
• Don Porter
• George Ruiz
• John Wesl
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Public Appearance/Comments (30 minutes)
4. Approval of Agenda

5. Consent Calendar
5.1 FINAL RESOLUTION NO 2012-10-24-01 FOR CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 7619
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.901/SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 376/PARCEL MAP
NO.36081
(A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: BUSINESS PARK TO RETAIL
COMMERCIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, BUSINESS PARK
AND PUBLIC FACILITIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW IN THIS STAFF REPORT TO
SEEK APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A 108 ACRE COMPREHENSIVE
MASTER PLANNED BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND AN EIGHTEEN LOT
INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP LOCATED NORTH OF BELLEGRAVE AVENUE,
SOUTH OF LANDON DRIVE, EAST OF I-15, AND WEST OF WINEVILLE
AVENUE IN THE HEAVY AGRICULTURE – 10 ACRE MINIMUM (A-2-10) ZONE.
APPLICANT: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL (IDI)
RECOMMENDATION
REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10-24-01 AND
AFFIRM THAT IT REFLECTS THE ACTION OF THE COMMISSION
6. Approval of Minutes
6.1 October 24, 2012 Regular Meeting
7. Planning Commission Business
7.1 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF DIRECTOR APPROVAL OF PLOT PLAN
NO. 24355 FOR A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY PURSUANT
TO ORDINANCE NO. 348 SECTION 18.30(f).
APPLICANT: REALCOM ASSOCIATES
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission review the action of the Planning Director to
approve PP24355 with conditions of approval for a 70 foot high disguised wireless
telecommunication facility (monopalm) pursuant to Ordinance No. 348 Section
18.30(f), and determine whether to permit the decision to stand, subject to citizen
appeal, or to assume jurisdiction and order a Planning Commission hearing to be
set.
11/7/12Planning Commission -2- City of Jurupa Valley

7.2 WORK SESSION FOR PAR1208 PROPOSED PROPANE REBOTTLlNG &
DISTRIBUTION FACILlTY AT 1893 BROWN AVENUE WITHIN THE AGUA
MANSA INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR (SPECIFIC PLAN 210)
APPLlCANT: KAMPS PROPANE (REPRESENTATIVE: J. OLlVER)
RECOMMENDATION
Receive a presentation from the applicant to introduce the proposed project,
discuss the project and identify issues that will need to be addressed as the project
moves forward.
8. Public Appearance/Comments, (only if needed)
9. Planning Commissioner's Reports and Comments
10. Planning Department Report
11. Adjournment to November 28, 2012 at the City Council Chambers
In complíanee wilh the Amerieans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Seetion 54954.2,
if you need speeial assistance to partieipate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley Planning
Commission, please call 951-332-6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or
time when serviees are needed will assist staft in assuring that reasonable arrangements ean be
made to provide aeeessibilily to the meeting or serviee.
Agendas of publíe meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majorily 0[, the
Jurupa Valley Planning Commission in eonneetion with a matter subjeet to diseussion or
eonsideration at an open meeting of the Planning Commission are publíe reeords. If sueh
wriling is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a publíe meeting, the writing will be made
available for publie inspeetion at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8304 Limonite Ave., Suite M,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority 0[, the
Jurupa Valley Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may also post the writing
on its Internet website at www';urupavallev.ora.
11/7/12Planning Commission -3- Cily of Jurupa Valley

STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
NOVEMBER 72012
CHAIR JOHNSON AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER
CHARLES RANGEL, SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 5
FINAL RESOLUTION NO 2012-10-24-01 FOR CHANGE OF ZONE NO.
7619 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.901/SPECIFIC PLAN NO.
376/PARCEL MAP NO.36081
(A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: BUSINESS
PARK TO RETAIL COMMERCIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL, L1GHT
INDUSTRIAL, BUSINESS PARK AND PUBLlC FACILITIES AS
DESCRIBED BELOW IN THIS STAFF REPORT TO SEEK APPROVAL
OF A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A 108 ACRE COMPREHENSIVE MASTER
PLANNED BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND AN EIGHTEEN LOT
INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP LOCATED NORTH OF BELLEGRAVE
AVENUE, SOUTH OF LANDON DRIVE, EAST OF 1-15, AND WEST OF
WINEVILLE AVENUE IN THE HEAVY AGRICULTURE - 10 ACRE
MINIMUM (A-2-10) ZONE.
APPLlCANT: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL (IDI)
RECOMMENDATION
REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10-24-01 ANO
AFFIRM THAT IT REFLECTS THE ACTION OF THE COMMISSION
BACKGROUND
On October 24, 2012, the Planning Commission by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner West
recused) adopted Resolution No. 2012-10-24-03 recommending City Council approval of
Change of Zone No. 7619 General Plan Amendment No.901/Specific Plan No. 376/Parcel
Map NO.36081. The motion included various modifications made to the resolution approving
Page 11
www.jurupavalley.org

the project and directed staff to present the resolution incorporating the modifications to the
Planning Commission for review at the meeting of November 7,2012 in order to affirm that
it accurately reflects what was articulated verbally into the record. A summary of those
changes is as follows:
• Remove the following permitted uses:
o
Petroleum and bulk fuel storage, aboye ground
o Warehousing and distribution
o
• Change to CUP:
o
o
Concrete, gypsum, plaster and mineral products manufacturing
Body and fender shops and spray painting
Equipment sales, rental and storage
o Truck and trailer sales and rental
• Section 111 Development Plans and Standards #2, Project-Wide Development Standards
to include uses Iisted are principallY "indoor uses".
• Recommend to the Council that the General Plan not be amended, inasmuch as the
proposed Specific Plan is designated as consistent with the existing General Plan land
use designation, and said existing designation provides greater flexibility in administering
the Specific Plan.
Prepared by:
Submitled by:
0/: J 01 ¡)
~/ 1

RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10-24-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY RECOMMENDING
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE
THOROUGHBRED FARM SPECIFIC PLAN, ADOPT A
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION, ADOPT A GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT, AND APPROVE A TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
108.2 ACRES IMMEDIATELY EAST OF INTERSTATE 15
AND ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELLGRA VE
A VENUE AND WINEVILLE ROAD
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. City of Jurupa Valley Land U se Regulatory Authority. The Planning
Commission ofthe City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The City ofJurupa ValIey incorporated on July 1, 2011.
(b) On July 1, 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2011-01. This
Ordinance provides that pursuant to the provisions ofGovernment Code Section 57376, all
ordinances ofthe County ofRiverside which have been applicable within the territory now
incorporated as the City of Jurupa Valley, to the extent that they applied before incorporation,
shalI remain in full force and effect as ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley, including the
Riverside County General Plan. Additionally, Ordinance No. 2011-01 provides that the
resolutions, rules and regulations ofthe County ofRiverside which have been applicable in the
implementation of the aforesaid ordinances and State laws (including, but not limited to, the
Califomia Environmental Quality Act and regulations pertaining to traffic) to the extent that they
applied before incorporation shall remain in fulI force and effect as resolutions, rules and
regulations, respectively, ofthe City of Jurupa Valley. On September 15, 2011, the City Council
adopted Ordinance No. 2011-10, effective October 15, 2011, continuing in effect alI ordinances
of the County ofRiverside which have been applicable within the ten"itory now incorporated as
the City of Jurupa ValIey, to the extent that they applied before incorporation. These ordinances
and resolutions as well as the Jmupa Valley Municipal Code shalI be known as "Jurupa Valley
Ordinances."
(c) On September 15,2011, the City Council also adopted Ordinance No.
2011-09, effective October 15, 2011, adopting Chapter 2.35 ofthe Jurupa ValIey Municipal
Code establishing the Planning Cornmission for the City ofJurupa Valley. Chapter 2.35
provides that the Planning Commission shalI perfOlID the planning agency functions described in
Government Code Section 65100 et seq., and shalI fulfill the functions delegated to the Planning
Cornmission for the County of Riverside under the relevant ordinances and resolutions, which
the City has adopted as required upon incorporation. Chapter 2.35 fuliher provides that the
Planning Cornmission shall perfonn the functions of any and alI planning, zoning or code
1

enforcement appeals board created by the relevant County ofRiverside ordinances and
resolutions, which the City has adopted by reference as required by law.
Section 2. The Project. The Thoroughbred Fatm Specific Plan Project (the
"Project") consists of a Specific Plan to govern the development of 108.2 gross acres in the Mira
Loma area within the City of Jurupa Valley (the "City") located immediately east oflnterstate 15
and on the nOlihwest corner of the intersection ofBellegrave A venue and Wineville Road. The
site was previously used as a thoroughbred farrn but is now vacant with the exception of a single
building on the site. The site is surrounded by industrial uses to the nOlih, a dairy to the east, and
residential uses to the south. As part of this project, Industrial Development lnternational (the
"Applicant") is seeking the following approvals for the Project:
(a) Specific Plan No. 376. A request to approve a Specific Plan for the
Project site that provides a land use plan to govern the development of the 108.2 acres. The
Specific Plan includes guidelines and development standards for 42.6 acres oflight industrial
uses, 36.5 acres ofbusiness park uses, 11.5 acres of commerciallretail uses, and 7.6 acres of
touristlcommercial uses. Also included within the Specific Plan is 10.0 acres of potential roads
to serve the project.
(b) Change of Zone Application No. 7619. A request to change the
zoning from A-2-10 (Heavy Agriculture-l0-acre minimum lot size) to SP (Specific Plan) which
will reflect the various standards and land uses detailed in the proposed Specific Plan.
(c) General Plan Amendment No. 901. A request to establish the boundaries
ofthe Specific Plan and change the land use designations shown on the General Plan's Jurupa
Area Plan Land Use Map from Community Development: Business Park (CD:BP)(0.25-0.60
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)) to Community Development: Commercial Retail (CD:CR)(0.20-0.35
F AR), Community Development: Business Park (CD:BP) )(0.25-0.60 FAR) to Community
Development: Commercial Tourist (CD:CT)(0.20-0.35 FAR) and Community Development:
Light Industrial (CD:LI)(0.25-0.60 FAR).
(d) Tentative Parcel Map No. 36081. A request to subdivide the 108.2
acres into 14 parcels.
Section 3. California Environmental Ouality Act Findings. Although the Project
had originally been submitted to the County ofRiverside for approval, during the time that the
Project applications were being processed, the City of JUlUpa Valley incorporated on July 1,
2011. As such, the Applicant is now seeking Project approval from the City and the City is now
lead agency ofthe Project under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Cal. Pub.
Res. Code §21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the "Guidelines") (14 Cal. Code Regs.
§ 15000 et seq.). The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of
CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The County originally prepared an initial studyand,
based on the information contained in the initial study, concluded that there was substantial
evidence that the Project might have a significant environmental impact. Pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Sections 15064 and 15081, and based upon the infOlmation contained in the lnitial
Study, the County ordered the preparation of an EIR for the Project to analyze the Project's
potential impacts on the environment. The Planning Commission, by separate Resolution No.
2

2012-10-04, which is hereby incorporated by reference, recornmended that the City Council
cel1ify the Final Environmental Impact Report, adopt findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a
Statement of OvelTiding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Repol1ing
Programo The documents and other material s that constitute the record on which this decision is
based are on file for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Jurupa
Valley, 8304 Limonite Avenue, Suite M Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
Section 4.
Project Findings.
(a) Specific Plan No. 376. The Project requires approval of a Specific
Plan pursuant to Section 2.8 and 2.9 ofRiverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as adopted
in the City of Jurupa Valley by Chapter 1.35 ofthe Jurupa Valley Municipal Codeo Pursuant to
Section 2.8 ofRiverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348 and Govemment Code Section
65454, the Planning Cornmission hereby finds that the proposed Specific Plan is consistent with
the General Plan land use designations and policies as the land uses allowed by the Specific Plan
are relatively compatible with one another with minimal impacts to the applicable policies in the
General Plan and with minimal impacts to the land use designations in the surrounding area
which are similar to those allowed by the Specific Plan. A full consistency analysis is contained
with the Final Environmental Impact Rep0l1 prepared for the Project which found that the
Project would have a less than significant impact in the land use and planning areas.
(b) Change of Zone Application No. 7619. The Project requires a change
ofzone pursuant to Section 20.2 and 20.3a ofRiverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as
adopted in the City ofJurupa Valley by Chapter 1.35 ofthe Jurupa Valley Municipal Codeo
Pursuant to Section 20.3a ofRiverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348 and Govemment Code
Section 65855, the Planning Cornmission hereby finds that the change of zone is consistent with
the General Plan as discussed aboye and as more fully discussed in the Final Environmental
Impact Rep0l1. The Planning Cornmission finds that the proposed change of zone is also
consistent with the proposed Specific Plan as it will allow for a change of zone from A-2-10
(Heavy Agricnlture-l O-acre minimum lot size) to SP (Specific Plan) which wil! reflect the
various standards and land uses detailed in the proposed Specific Plan.
(c) General Plan Amendment No. 901. The Project requires a General Plan
amendment pursuant to Section 2.4 and 2.10 ofRiverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as
adopted in the City of Jurupa Valley by Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Codeo
Pursuant to Section 2.4.f.2, the Planning Cornmission hereby finds the following:
1) The proposed amendment do es not involve a change in or conflict
with the Riverside County Vision which specifies "Riverside County is a family of special
communities in a remarkable environmental setting." In general, the proposed changes in land
use to be implemented with this General Plan Amendment will change the land uses on the
Project site to be consistent with uses in the surrounding area ofthe Project site thereby ensuring
that uses are consistent in the community.
2) The proposed amendment does not involve a change in or conflict
with any General Planning PrincipIe set f0l1h in General Plan Appendix B. In fact, the Project is
3

consistent with many ofthe General Planning PrincipIes set forth in Appendix B, particularly the
economic principIes encouraging job creation and employment type uses.
3) The proposed amendment does not involve a change in or conflict
with any Foundation Component designation in the General Plan. The change in land use is
within the same Foundation Component of Cornmunity Development and no change or conflict
would result.
4) The proposed amendment would either contribute to the purposes
ofthe General Plan or, at a minimum, would not be detrimental to them as more fully detailed in
the Final Enviromnental Impact Report completed for the Project which found that the Project
would have a less than significant impact with regard to inconsistency with the General Plan.
5) The amendment is required to expand basic employmentjob
opportunities and would improve the ratio of jobs-to-workers in the City. More specifically, the
Project is anticipated to pro vide light industrial uses, business park uses, and cornmercial, retail
and tourist type uses. As the Project site is largely vacant, these new uses wil! expand
employment oppOliunities and aid in improving the ratio of jobs-to-workers in the City.
(d) Tentative Parcel Map No. 36081. The Project requires a Tentative
Parcel Map to subdivide the 108.2 acres into 14 parcels pursuant to Riverside County Ordinance
No. 460, as adopted in the City of JUlUpa Valley by Chapter 1.35 ofthe JUlUpa Valley Municipal
Codeo The Planning Commission hereby finds:
1) The proposed land division, design and improvement is consistent
with the Riverside County General Plan, and each element thereof as addressed aboye and more
fully analyzed in the Final Enviromnental Impact Repoli completed for the Project.
2) The site ofthe proposed land division is physical1y suitable for the
type of development proposed for the Project as the site is large enough to accornmodate the
proposed uses and infi'astlUcture required for the Project.
3) The design ofthe proposed land division and the proposed
improvements, with appropriate conditions of approval and mitigation measures under the
California Environmental Quality Act that wil! be imposed as conditions of approval, are not
likely to cause substantial enviromnental damage or substantially and avoidably in jure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
4) The design ofthe subdivision and the type of improvements are
not likely to cause serious public health problems, except as detailed in the Final Enviromnental
Impact Report completed for the Project.
5) The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements wil!
not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property
within the proposed subdivision, or the design ofthe alternate easements which are substantially
equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided.
4

6) The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the
subdivision are consistent with the JUlUpa Valley Municipal Code, specifically Artiele V of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, as amended, regarding Subdivisions, and Riverside
County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as amended, and both incorporated into the JUlUpa Valley
Municipal Code by Chapter 1.35 ofthe JUlUpa Va11ey Municipal Code, and a11 applicable state
laws.
7) The tentative parce1 map does not propose to divide land which is
subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, nor
is the land subject to a Land Conservation Act contract.
8) The design ofthe subdivision provides for future passive 01' natural
heating or cooling oppOltunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. In particular, prior to
the constlUction ofbuildings, the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the
Building Department that comply with the UnifOlID Building Code, which contains requirements
for energy conservation.
9) The Project is consistent with and in compliance with the
requirements ofthe Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
Section 5. Recommendation. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission
hereby recommends that the City Council adopt or approve the fo11owing entitlements for the
Thoroughbred FalID Specific Plan Project, subject to the attached conditions of approval:
(a)
Specific Plan No. 376 with the following modifications:
1) Duplicate the "Green Design Development Standards" 1 through
12 in Section VI (b) of Section VI "Green Design" and inelude them in Section III (B)(2)
"Project-Wide Development Standards" as standards18-29, and in Table III-6, "Development
Standards."
2) Remove Ji'om Table III-2, "Permitted Uses for Light Industrial
Land Uses" the following uses: (i) Concrete, gypsum, plaster and mineral products
manufacturing; (ii) Petroleum and bulk fuel storage, aboye ground, pursuant to Ordinance No.
546; and (iii) Warehousing and distribution.
3) Remove from Table III-3, "PelIDitted Uses for Business Park Land
Uses" the fo11owing uses: (i) Concrete, gypsum, plaster and mineral products manufacturing; and
(ii) Warehousing and distribution.
4) Change "Body and fender shops and spray painting" from Site
Deve10pment Permit (SDP) approval required to Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval
required in Table III-2, "Permitted Uses for Light Industrial Land Uses," in Table III-3
"Permitted Uses for Business Park Land Uses" and in Table III-4 "Permitted Uses for
CommerciallRetail Land Uses."
5) Change "Equipment rental services, including rototillers, power
mowers, sanders, power saws, cement and plaster mixers not exceeding 20 cubic feet in capacity
5

and other similar equipment" from Site Deve!opment Permit (SDP) approval required to
Conditional Use Pelmit (CUP) approval required in Table III-4 "Permitted Uses for
CommerciallRetail Land Uses" and in Table III-5, "Pelmitted Uses for CommercialJTourist Land
Uses."
6) Change "Tmcks and trailers; the rental oftmcks not over 19,500
pounds gross vehicle weight, with body not to exceed 22 feet in length from the back of the cab
to the end ofbody; and the rental oftrailers not exceeding six feet in width or 22 feet in length"
from Site Development Pe!mit (SDP) approval required to Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
approval required in Table III-3 "Pelmitted Uses for Business Park Land Uses," in Table III-4
"Permitted Uses for CommerciallRetail Land Uses" and in Table III-5, "Pelmitted Uses for
CommercialJTourist Land Uses."
7) Modify Project-Wide Development Standard No. Il0eated in
Section III (B)(2) "Project-Wide Deve10pment Standards" as follows: "The Thoroughbred Farm
Specific Plan shall be developed in general eonformanee with the Land Use Plan (Figure III-l,
Land Use Plan). General permitted uses include Light Industrial, Business Park,
CommerciallRetail, CommerciallTourist and other uses for the individual Planning Areas as
delineated in Table 1I-6, Deve!opment Standards. The permitted land uses detailed in Tables III-
2 through III-5 shall be prineipally indoor uses in an enclosed building."
(b) Change ofZone Applieation No. 7619.
(c) General Plan Amendment No. 901, with the understanding that the
General Plan Amendment not be adopted if it is determined to be unneeessary for
implementation of the Projeet.
(d) Tentative Paree! Map No. 36081.
Seetion 6.
Resolution.
Certification. The Planning Manager shall eertify to the adoption ofthis
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission ofthe City of
Jumpa Valley on this 24th day ofOetober, 2012.
Kim Johnson
Chair of Jumpa Valley Planning Commission
ATTEST:
6

Thomas Merrell
Planning Manager and Secretary to the Planning Commission
7

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
) ss.
CITY OF JURUP A VALLEY )
1, Thomas Men·ell, Planning Manager of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 2012-10-24-01 was duly adopted and passed at a meeting ofthe
Planning Commission ofthe City ofJUlupa Valley on the 24th day ofOctober, 2012 by the
following vote, to wi!:
A YES:
COMMISSION MEMBERS:
NOES:
COMMISSION MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSION MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONMEMBERS:
TROMAS MERRELL
PLANNING MANAGER
8

CityofJ
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2012
TO:
FROM:
BY:
CHAIR JOHNSON ANO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER
ANNETTE TAM, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO 7.1
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF DIRECTOR APPROVAL OF PLOT
PLAN NO. 24355 FOR A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILlTY
PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 348 SECTION 18.30(f).
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission review the action of the Planning Director to approve
PP24355 with conditions of approval for a 70 foot high disguised wireless
telecommunication facility (monopalm) pursuant to Ordinance No. 348 Section 18.30(f),
and determine whether to permit the decision to stand, subject to citizen appeal, or to
assume jurisdiction and order a Planning Commission hearing to be sel.
BACKGROUND
Code section 18.30(f) states:
t. APPEALS - (WIRELESS COMMUNICATlON FACILITIES PLOT PLANS). An applicant
or any other interested party may appeal trom the decision ot the Planning Director by
the foIJowing procedure:
(1) Inítíal Appeal. The Planning Director shaIJ file hislher notíce of decision with the
secretary ot the Planning Commission or the East Area Planning Councíl, whichever is
appropríate given the location, together with a report of the proceedings, not more than
fifteen (15) days after making the decision. A copy of the notíce ot decision shall be
maíled to the applicant and to any person who has made a wrítten request tor a copy of
the decision. The secretary ot the Planning Commission or the East Area Planning
Council shaIJ place the notíce of decision on the next agenda of the Planning
Commission or the East Area Planning Councíl, held five (5) or more days after the
secretary receives the notíce trom the Planning Director. The decision ot the Planning
Director is considered final and no actíon by the Planning Commission or the East Area
Planning Councíl is required unless, wíthin ten (10) days after the notíce appears on the
Planning Commission or the East Area Planning Councíl agenda, the applicant or an
interested person files an appeal, accompanied by the fee set forth in County Ordinance
No. 671, or unless the Planning Commission or the East Area Planning Councíl
assumes jurísdictíon by orderíng the maller set tor public hearing. If a tímely appeal is
,,,ww.jurupavalley.org
page 11

filed, or Ihe Planníng Commíssíon or Ihe Easl Area Planníng Couneil assumes
jurísdíetíon by orderíng Ihe maller sel for publíe hearíng, Ihe seerelary of Ihe Planníng
Commíssíon or Ihe Easl Area P/anníng Couneil shall sel Ihe maller for publíe hearíng
before Ihe Planníng Commíssíon or Ihe Easl Area P/anníng Couneil nol less Ihan fíve (5)
nor more Ihan Ihírly (30) days Ihereafter and shall gíve wrítten notíce of Ihe hearíng ín
Ihe same manner as notíee was gíven for Ihe orígínal hearíng.
PROJECT & LOCATION SUMMARY
Applicant
Proposal
Location
General Plan Land Use Designation
Zoning
Existing Land Use
Total Lot Size
California Environmental Quality Act
RealCom Assoeiates
New 70' high disguised telecommunications wireless
facility (monopalm) with 18 antennas, 2live 40 foot
high palm trees, perimeter landscaping, 184 squarefoot
equipment shelter, and accessory equipment
within a 900 square-foot lease area. A six (6) foot high
split-face masonry block wall will enclose this 900
square-foot lease area.
Northwest corner of Rubidoux Blvd. & 20'" Street
(5880 20 th Street)
Community Oevelopment; Light Industrial (CO: LI)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
Truck Rental Facility (Ryder)
3.87 acres
Categorically Exempt - Class 3 (New Construction or
Conversion of Small Structures)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION & ANAL YSIS
Plot Plan application, PP24355, proposes a new 70 foot high wireless communications facilily
disguised as a palm tree, two new live 40 foot palm trees, an accessory structure, and
accessory equipment on the northeast corner of a 3.87 acre induslrial parcel zoned M-SC
(Manufacturing-Service Commercial). The 900 square-foot lease area will be enclosed by a new
6 foot high decorative block wall and Ihree foot high shrubs. The applicalion was initialed with
Ihe County and transferred lo the City for final review and approval after the design and County
slaff review were completed.
LOCATION
The project site is bordered by three streets: Avalon Street, 20 th Street, and Rubidoux
Boulevard. It is located at the northwest corner of 20 th Street and Rubidoux Boulevard on a
property occupied by Ryder Truck Rental & Leasing. Skanska USA is located east of Rubidoux
Boulevard and north of Market Stree!. Universal Forest Products is west of Avalon Slreel and
South of 20 th Stree!.
ww,v.jmupavalley.org
Page I 2

Figure 1 - Aerial View
ELEVATION
The disguised wireless communicalions facilily is disguised as a palm Iree. There are several
condilions of approval Ihal applies lo Ihe aeslhetics of Ihe lease area and Ihe facilily. The color
of Ihe monopalm's Irunk shall be brown and Ihe color of Ihe anlenna shall be dark green lo
malch Ihe fronds. The two live Irees shall be a minimum of 40 feel high and be planled nearby
Ihe monopalm wilhin Ihe lease area. The live palm Irees shall be guaranleed for a period of Iwo
years after planling. A brown equipmenl cabinel will be mostly hidden from slreel view. The
lease area will be enclosed wilh a 6 fool high decoralive block wall. Three fool high shrubs are
lo be planled around Ihe exlerior perimeler of Ihe enclosed lease area.
Page I 3
www.junlpavalley.org '.

Figure 2 - Photo simulation (North West vlew from Rubidoux Blvd.)
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
The project will be located on the northeast comer of a 3.87 improved property and will not
disturb any natural landscaping. The maximum height of a disguised wireless
telecommunication facility in a non-residential zone is seventy (70) feet. The project does not
exceed the maximum height. AII wireless communication facilities shall be sited so as to
minimize adverse impacts to the surrounding community and biological resources. This project
is sited in a location where it does not have any immediate impacts to those resources. This
area is located in an industrial area near the Agua Mansa Industrial Corridor. AII wireless
communication facilities are required to have landscaping around the perimeter of the leased
area and it should match the natural landscaping in the area. This project is proposed to have 3
foot high shrubs planted around the perimeter of the lease area and two 40 foot live palm trees
near the monopalm. AII new landscaping will be irrigated. The minimum setback to any
habitable dwelling is 125% (87.5 feet) of the facility height. The monopalm is at least 200% (140
feet) away from any habitable dwelling. The surrounding zoning is M-SC (Manufacturing -
Service Commercial) and the surrounding land use is industrial. This proposal is in conformance
with the General Plan and Ordinance 348. The project is consistent with the development
.' Ww\v. jurupavalley.org
Page 14

standards set forth in Article XIXg of Ordinance 348.
ACTION
On September 27, 2012, PP24355 was approved by the Planning Director with conditions of
approval after a 10 day public notice for comments. Per Ordinance No. 348 Section 18.30(f),
the Planning Commission can take no action, which triggers a 10 day appeal period, or can
decide to assume jurisdiction and order a Commission hearing at a later date.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Planning Director's Action Form is atlached to this reporto
were in agreement regarding the action taken.
Staft, applicant and Director
Prepared by:
Submitled by:
Annetle Tam
Assistant Planner
~C;rí~U ~C.'-o7Z(t*(l.~
Thomas G. Merrell, ACIP
Planning Manager
Reviewed by:
Christopher Diaz
Assistant City Atlorney
Atlachments:
1. September 27,2012 Planning Manager's Action Form
Page 15
W\Vw.jwupavalley.org

REQUEST FOR PLANNING DlRECTOR'S ACTlON .
DIRECTOR'S DECISION DATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2012
PLOT PLAN (SITE DEVElOPMENT
PERMIT) CASE
PP24355
APPlICANT REALCOM
PROPERTY OWNER(S) RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.
PROJECT ADDRESS 588020" STREET (APN: 175-160-019)
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT - CLASS 3 (NEW CONSTRUCTION OR
QUAlITY ACT (CEQA) CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES)
RECOMMENDATION APPROVE SUBJECT ro ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Plot Plan application, PP24355, pro poses to request approval for a new 70 foot high wireless
communications facility disguised as a palm tree, two new live palm trees, an accessory structure, and
accessory equipment on the northeast comer of a 3.87 acre industrial parcel zoned M-SC
(Manufacturing-Service Commercial). The 900 square-foot lease area will be enclosed by a new 6 foot
high decorative block wall and three foot high shrubs.
ANALYSIS
The project demonstrates consistency to the General Plan and complfance with Ordinance 348. The
proposed site is zoned M-SC (Manufacturing - Service Commercial) and has a General Plan Land Use
Designation of CD: 1I (Community Development: light Industrial). Wireless communications facilities are
permitted in this zone subject to an approved Plot Plan (Sfte Development Permit). The proposal
complies with the development standards set forth in Article XIXg (Wireless Communications Facilities)
of Ordinance No. 348.
ACTION
On September 27, 2012, the Planning Director took the follqwing action on the aboye referenced case:
V APPROVED the Plot Plan (Site Development Permit), subject to the attached conditions.
DENIED the Plot Plan (Site Development Permit) based on the attached findings.
Sincerely,
1
Thomas G. Merrell, ACIP, Planning Director
8304 Limonite Avenue, Suite M, Jurupa Valley, CA 91759 I PP24355

CONDlTIONS OF APPROVAL
1. FEES. The approval ofPP24355 shall not become effective until all planning fees have been
paid in full.
2. APPROVAL PERIOD. This Plot Plan (Site Development Permit) approval shall be used
within two (2) years from the approval date. Otherwise, the plot plan shall become null and
void. The term "use" means the beginning of substantial construction of the use that is
authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the
actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under the terms of the authorized use.
3. CONFORMANCE. The proposal shall conform substantially to the following exhibits:
a. Exhibit "A" dated ¡une 28, 2012 -(Sheets 1 to 7)
4. COLORS & MATERIAI,s. The equipment cabinet color shall be grey or in earthtones, which
will blend with the surrounding setting. The color ofthe monopalm (trunk) shall be light to
dark brown, and the color of the antenna array shall be dark green, in order to minimize
visual impacts. Changes in the aboye listed colors shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Department prior to installation of the structures, or prior to repainting of the
structures.
5. LANDSCAPING. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed in
accordance with approved Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans, Ordinance No. 859
(as adopted and anyamendments thereto), and the City oflurupa Valley Guide to California
Landscaping. The plants shall be healthy and free ofweeds, disease or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and determined to be in good working order.
6. LANDSCAPING. Landscaping plans shall incorporate a minimum of two (2) - 40 ft. brown
trunk Phoenix dactylifera 'Deglet Noor' date palms. Provide a planting plan that locates
palm trees in relationship to the proposed monopalm. Provide a palm planting detail and
palm planting specifications. The plan, detail, and specifications shall be reviewed by the
City Landscape Architect prior to final project approval by the Planllillg Director. New palm
trees shall be guaranteed for a period of two years after plalltillg alld acceptallce by the City
of ¡urupa Valley.
7. ELECTRONIC INTERFERENCE. The applicant shall adhere to the Associatioll of Public
Safety CommUllications Officials (APCO) Standards and Best Practices in the installation and
operation of the wireless facility. If the operation of the facilities authorized by this
approved plot plan (Site Development Permit) generates electronic interference with 01'

otherwise impairs the operation of any public agency communication facilities, the
applicant shall be notified and shall institute measures to eliminate the interfere to the
satisfaction of the affected public agencies.
8. MAINTENANCE. The project site shall be kept in good repair. Graffiti shall be removed from
any structures within one week of observation and/or notification. rhe project site and a
minimum area of 10 feet around the project site shall be kept free of weeds and other
obtrusive vegetation for fire prevention purposes.
9. MAINTENANCE. AlI plant materials within landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable
growth condition throughout the Iife of this permito
10 .MAINTENANCE. If at any time the fronds are missing or deteriorated (as determined by the
Planning Department), the City shall notify the applicant in writing. rhe applicant shall
replace or repair such fronds within 30 days of notification.
11.PERFORMANCE SECURITIES. Prior to issuanee of any building permit, performance
securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee
the installation ofplantings, irrigation system, walls and/or fences, in accordance with the
approved plan, shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety. Securities may
require review by City Attorney and other staff. Permit holder is encouraged to allow
adequate time to ensure that securities are in place. rhe performance security may be
released one year after structural final, inspection report, and the One-Year Post
Establishment report confirms that the plantings and irrigation components have been
adequately installed and maintained. A cash or bond security shall be required when the
estimated cost is $2,500.00 or less.
12. FRONDS DESIGN. Prior to issuanee of any building permit, the developer/permit holder
shall provide a palm frond design, consistent with the approved plot plan that covers all the
antennas. After reviewing the building plans, the Planning Department shall clear this
condition upon determination of compliance.
13. FRONDS DESIGN. Prior to final inspeetion of any, buildiug permit, the developer Ipermit
holder shall ensure that the palm fronds are designed and placed in such a mauner that
covers all of the antennas. rhe Planning Department shall clear this condition upon
determination of compliance.
14.DEPOSIT - LANDSCAPE lNSPECTION. Prior to final inspection of any building permit,
the developer/permit holder shall file an Inspectiou Request Form and deposit sufficient
funds to cover the costs ofthe Pre-Installation, the lnstallation, and Dne Year Post-

Establishment landscape inspections. The deposit required for landscape inspections shall
be determined by the Planning Department prior to approval ofthe requisite Plot Plan (Site
Development Permit) for Planting and Irrigation. The Planning Department shall clear this
condition upon determination of compliance.
15.INFORMA TION - LANDSCAPE INSPECTION. The developerjpermit holder's landscape
architect is responsible for preparing the Landscaping and Irrigation Plans (or on-site
representative) and shall arrange for a PRE-INSTALLATION INSPECTION with the Planning
Department at least five (5) working days prior to the installation of any landscape or
irrigation components. Upon successful completion ofthe PRE-lNSTALLATION
INSPECTION, the applicant will proceed with the installation ofthe approved landscape and
irrigation system and arrange for an INSTALLATION INSPECTION at least five 5 working
days prior to the building final inspection or issuance of occupancy permit, whichever
occurs first. Upon successful completion ofthe INSTALLATION INSPECTION, the Planning
Department's Landscape Inspector and the permit holder's landscape architect (or on-site
representative) shall execute a Landscape Certificate of Completion that shall be submitted
to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The Planning
Department shall clear this condition upon determination of compliance.
16. SIGNAGE. Prior to final inspection of any building permit, the permit holder, developer
or successor-in-interest shall install a sign no smaller than 12 inches by 12 inches upon an
exterior wall or fence that surrounds the lease area that provides the following contact
information:
a. address of wireless communications facility and any internal site identification
number or code;
b. name(s) of company who operates the wireless communications facility;
c. full company address, including mailing address and division name that will address
problems;
d. telephone number ofwireless communications facility company

DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2012
TO:
FROM:
BY:
CHAIR JOHNSON AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER
ANNETTE TAM, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.2
WORK SESSION FOR PAR1208 PROPOSED PROPANE REBOTTLlNG &
DISTRIBUTION FACILlTY AT 1893 BROWN AVENUE WITHIN THE AGUA
MANSA INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR (SPECIFIC PLAN 210)
APPLlCANT: KAMPS PROPANE (REPRESENTATIVE: J. OLlVER)
RECOMMENDATION
Receive a presentation from Ihe applicanl lo introduce the proposed project, discuss the projecl
and identify issues that will need lo be addressed as the project moves forward.
PRE-APPLlCATION
The applicanl, Kamps Propane, has submitled an application for a Pre-Application Review
(PAR). The Pre-Applicalion Review is an optional procedure for development proposals. There
are several purposes and benefits to completing a PAR. Staff will assess whether Ihe
development proposal is consistent with the current City standards and requirements, identify
any major issues or any required studies, and provide a writlen report with Ihe City's
assessment of the pro posa!. With Ihe assessment and the report, Ihe staff can advise Ihe
applicanl and Ihis process will shorten the processing time for an entitlement.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Kamps Propane is a middle-sized independent propane dislribulor with planls in Northern and
Soulhern California with an additional wholesale office in Salt Lake City, Ulah. The applicant is
proposing to construct a facility thal would be located on the north side of Wilson Streel and
west side of Brown Avenue. This proposal includes the installation of aboveground liquefied
petroleum gas (LPG) storage tanks ranging in size from 30,000 gallons lo 60,000 gallons,
upgrading existing rail siding to accommodale LPG rail tank cars, demolition of existing sleelsided
buildings, construction of a steel building and a barbeque lank processing facility,
installation of a modular office building, and other site improvements such as walls, parking
area, and landscaping.
LOCATION
The project site is located at the northwest corner of Brown Avenue and Wilson Street within the
Agua Mansa Industrial Corridor. The Agua Mansa Industrial Corridor is localed lo the south of
the Interstate 10, east of the Interstate 215, and north of the Interstale 60. For decades, this
w,v,v.jurupavalley.org
page 11

area has been developed as a concentration of heavy industrial activities. CRST Expedited, a
truck hauling company, is located to the west of the subject property. Ruby Metals, a metal
scrap processing facility, is located to the north of the subject property. A propane tank
exchange company (Blue Rhino) and a material recovery facility (MRF) (Burrtec Waste
Industries are located within half a mile from the subject property.
Figure 1 - Aerial View
REQUESTED ENTITLEMENTS
The applicant will be seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project site currently
has a General Plan land use designation of Community Development: Heavy Industrial (CD: HI)
and is zoned Manufacturing-Heavy (M-H).
PURPOSE OF WORK SESSION
This is an opportunity for the applicant to present their proposal and receive comments from the
Planning Commission. This proposal encompasses the handling of volatile material in a few
,y,yw.jUl'upavalley.org
Page I 2

formals. There will be large aboveground slorage lanks for rebotlling or refíllíng smaller lanks
and lhe díslríbulíon of propane lanks. The raíl and lrucks wíll be used lo díslríbule lanks.
PRELIMINARY STAFF COMMENTS
1. Duríng lhe Pre-Applicalíon Revíew process, lhe projecl plans wíll be rouled lo Cíly
departmenls and relevanl oulsíde agencíes for commenls, íncludíng lhe Fíre Departmenl
and lhe Counly Sheríff, lhal may affecl lhe future desígn of lhe proposed síle plan or
procedural requíremenls for lhe project.
2. Based on lhe Pre-Applicalíon Revíew commenls receíved, lhe lechnícal sludíes lhal wíll be
necessary for future projecl revíew under lhe Californía Envíronmenlal Qualíty Acl (CEQA)
will be delermíned.
Prepared by:
Submítted by:
Annetle Tam
Assíslanl Planner
Jr»t4'¿ixf¡ ~l.¡,I&C'---­
Thomas G. Merrell, AICP
Planníng Manager
Attachments:
1. Narralíve
2. Exhíbíl of Exíslíng General Plan Desígnalíon
3. Exhíbíl of Exíslíng Zoníng
4. Prelimínary Síte Plan
Page I 3
\VW\v.jurupavalley.org

Date: May 14, 2012
Re: Kamps Propane's Proposcd Storage and Distl'ibution Faeility
6.36 Aeres at 1893 Brown Ave and Wilson Street, City of Jurupa Valley
Kamp's Propane
Kamps Propane is a middle-sized independent LPG (propane) distributor with p1ants in Northern and Southern
California with an additional wholesale office in Salt Lake City, Utah. Its primary business is the sales and
distribution of LPG to consumers by cargo truck, cylinder delivery or large transport cargo to wholesale and
industrial end users. Kamps Propane currently employs 265 people. There are three main divisions:
.. Kiva is a bulk LPG transport company that operates an LPG rail car terminal and over the road cargo
transpOlt trucks;
.. Piek Up Pl'opane is an LPG BBQ cylinder refurbishing and distribution company; and
.. Kamps Pl'opane, Ine. is an LPG distribution company that sells to homes and small businesses that use
smaller tanks. This project will incorporate all three ofthese operations at this site. However, they will be
phased in as the business grows. The first phase will be the rail terminal, storage tanks and Pick Up
Propane BBQ cylinder facility.
Pl'ojeet Desel'iption
We are proposing to improve an existing 6.36 acre parcellocated on brown Ave and Wilson St. for operation by
all three divisions referenced above-Kiva Energy, Pick Up Propane, and Kamps Propane. Two major
requirements in our selection of the site were: 1) close proximity to freeways and 2) nearby rail service. This site
is located in the Agua Mansa Industrial District. The site is current1y used as the office and construction yard for
Brundage-Bore Concrete. There are 1arge construction and concrete pumping vehicles parked and repaired on
site. The primary development is as follows:
.. Demolition of derelict steel-sided buildings to allow the 'installation of the aboveground LPG storage
tanks and BBQ cylinder refurbishing center.
.. Upgrade the existing rail siding to accommodate LPG rail tank cars.
.. Site grading to accommodate operations and drainage.
" Installation of aboveground LPG storage tanks ranging in size fi'om 30,000 gallons to 60,000 gallons
each. First phase will be 2-30,000 gallon LPG tanks to allow operations until the use pennit for the
complete operation is approved,
• Install fixed monitor fire protection system fol' rail cars and storage tanles.
.. Build a steel shop building and BBQ tank processing facility.
.. Add a double-wide construction office for construction then convert it to the business office for the site's
three operations.
.. Add steel awning coverings to protect the filled BBQ tanks from the weather.

• Add outside product storage screening.
• A proposed plot plan is incIuded.
Operational Phasing ofProject
Phase 1:
Phase 2:
Phase 3:
Insta11 2-30,000 ga110n LPg stol'age tanks, rail siding and unloading facility, and Pick Up Propane
BBQ cylinder facility.
Insta11ation of additional 30,000 to 60,000 ga110n LPG tanks.
Kamps Propane bulk tlUck LPG delivery-homes and businesses.
Project Benefits
• Projected taxable retail sales is $10,000,000 annua11y. The anticipated time fi'ame to meet the projected
sales levels is tlu'ee to five years.
• Approximately 66 fu11-time employees when al! phases are completed.
• Approximately $5.7 million in capital improvement to the site.
• Consumers will save money on their LPG because the Kiva rail telminal will al!ow for better fuel pricing
due to the large volume that it can process. This will also relate to lower wholesale prices fol' bulk
customers in the Inland Empire and Tri-Val!ey area.
Fire and Safetv
An extensive Fire Safety Analysis (FSA) will be perfonned then reviewed by the Riverside County Fire
Depaliment. The analysis will incIude a11 code required f¡re safety equipment and emergency response planning.
In addition to the FSA, the site will be subject to Process Hazards Management Procedures.
The LPG rail tenuinal is also snbject to a Risk Management Plan. Security measures for the site incIude locked
access gates, video monitoring on site and perimeter security measures. The entire site's LPG operations can be
stopped by the activation of one of several remote Emergency Shutdown switches. These switches will cIose al!
the storage tanks, stop al!loading or unloading pumps and cIose a11loading and unloading safety valves. A11 of
the safety valves used for the site's loading and unloading processes are designed as cIosed defauIt valves. In the
case of a loss of power, a11 valves will cIose until power has been restored. There is no operation on the site that
requires power to keep valves in a safe position.
The tanks and LPG operations will have water f¡re sprinklers that are both automatic and manua11y operated.
Fire protection for the site will be added with the insta11ation of sprinklers in the processing building and water
nozzle spray for the tanks and loading areas.
Hours of Operation
NOlmal hours of operation will be fi'om 6:00 am to 5:00 pm. The rail terminal hours will depend on the weather
and time ofyear. They can be 24 hours a day at rare times, but are genera11y fi'om7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Number of daily vehicle tdps
The average daily vehicIe trips are estimated to be 40.

Types ofEguipment and Commodities Stored on Site
There will be large (30,000 gallon and up) LPG storage tanks permanently attached to the site. The rail siding
has room for 8+ cars at one time. There will be approximately 20 delivery tlUcks and transports parked when not
operating.
Storage of the BBQ cylinders will be under a covered roof to protect them fi:om the weather and to screen
operations fi'om other propeliies. Wooden and plastic pallets for the BBQ tanks and metal storage cages fol' the
tanks will be stored in the proposed steel building. There will be a minimalnumber of small 150 to 250 gallon
LPG tanks when the Kamps Propane division is added to the sÍle at Phase 3.
There will be aboye ground diesel tanks on site for the delivery tlUck refueling for all company vehicles only.
Vehicle Maintenance
Thel'e will be no heavy vehicle repair on site-only minor maintenance fol' company vehicles.
Drawings and Photos
Kiva Energy Rail Terminal in Riverbank, Califomia. Kiva Energy will be the primary user of
the rail siding on site.
Site Plan-shows 3 possible raíl spurs and possible layout of multiple 30,000 and 60,000 gallon LPG tanks
These drawings are very preliminary. The final layout will be detelmined by the design of the RR siding and the
grading plan that will be required for stonn water retention / treatmen!.

Riverside County GIS
Page 1 of 1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY GIS
PF
SAN 8ERNARDlNO
GOLf/N
Selected parcel(s):
175-190-017 175-190-022 175-190-026
'IMPORTANT'
Maps and dala are lo be usad far reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are no! necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering
slandards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as lo the conten! (the source is afien ¡hird party), accuracy, timeliness, or
completeness of any ofthe data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for Ihe information contained on this map. Any use of Ihis product with
raspee! to accuracy and precision shall be the sofe responsibi!ity of the user.
REPORT PRINTED ON .. Tue Oc! 3016:58:532012
Version 120920
10/30/2012

Riverside County GIS
Page 1 of 1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY GIS
SAN BERNARDlNO
COUNrv
Selected parcel(s):
175-190-017 175-190-022 175-190-026
*IMPORTANT"
Maps and data are to be used for raferanee purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are no! necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering
standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantes as lo the conten! (the source is aften third party), accuracy, timeJiness, or
completeness of aoy ofthe data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility forthe information contained on this map. Any use ofthis product wlth
raspee! to accuracy and precision sha!l be the sale responsibi!ity of the user.
REPüRT PRINTED ON .. Tue Oct 3017:21:312012
Version 120920
10/30/2012

"
¡ji ~
1:; >-3
~, t::1
¡ ~
~
,
;~f
~>,'" tU
GZ
I
i
i
J
i i
i
i
i
='
~I
,
:( .... ~,.,."'==""'" )~
:( "'i'~...,,,.,,,=m"'~:J:
: ( ."'=" ".'"