- Page 1: November2007
- Page 4 and 5: Figure S-1: Study Area Map D. Proje
- Page 6 and 7: GPL ETL • MD 152: Option 1 • MD
- Page 8 and 9: Table S-2. Communities/Right-of-Way
- Page 10 and 11: Table of Contents I. PURPOSE AND NE
- Page 12 and 13: Figure II-7. MD 543 Option 1 Figure
- Page 14 and 15: I. PURPOSE AND NEED A. Identificati
- Page 16 and 17: Figure I-1: Study Area Map C. Backg
- Page 18 and 19: areas within or connecting county-d
- Page 21 and 22: . Safety The accident rate for Sect
- Page 23 and 24: Table I-2. AM and PM Average Daily
- Page 25 and 26: Table I-4. Crash Data for Years 200
- Page 27 and 28: equired to cross 3 or more general
- Page 29 and 30: This concept would provide good ove
- Page 31 and 32: No Build Interchange Analysis • I
- Page 33 and 34: • Option 3: Single Point Urban Di
- Page 35 and 36: Analysis: • Option 1A provides th
- Page 37 and 38: Analysis: • Option 1 would mainta
- Page 39 and 40: Two through lanes would generally b
- Page 47 and 48: 3. Express Toll Lane Alternative Th
- Page 49: to the I-95 northbound ETLs. Two I-
- Page 57 and 58: Table II-1. Project Weekday 2030 LO
- Page 59 and 60: c. Enforcement The No-Build Alterna
- Page 61 and 62: Table II-3. Projected Needs for Par
- Page 63 and 64: Figure II-15. MD 152 Park and Ride
- Page 65 and 66: 4. Costs The term No-Build is often
- Page 67 and 68: 1. Population Table III-1 shows the
- Page 69 and 70: Table III-2: Population Statistics
- Page 71 and 72: area: Bradshaw, Loreley, and Lloyd.
- Page 73 and 74: some traffic away from the general
- Page 75 and 76: Table III-4: Communities Located wi
- Page 77 and 78: Table III-4: Communities Located wi
- Page 80 and 81: Table III-5: Summary of ROW Impacts
- Page 82 and 83: the northeast quadrant of this inte
- Page 84 and 85: northbound MD 7, providing better a
- Page 86 and 87: needed for the ramp from I-95 south
- Page 88 and 89: The loop ramp connecting northbound
- Page 90 and 91: Mitigation Fair market value would
- Page 92 and 93: Although the visual environment of
- Page 94: • Calvary Worship Center • Calv
- Page 97 and 98: The No-Build Alternative would not
- Page 99 and 100: also served by the White Marsh Prec
- Page 101 and 102:
In addition to public parks, there
- Page 103 and 104:
a. Base Realignment and Closure The
- Page 105 and 106:
This alternative would be consisten
- Page 107 and 108:
Option 4A would impact the undevelo
- Page 109 and 110:
The Harford County 2004 Master Plan
- Page 113 and 114:
D. Cultural Resources Cultural reso
- Page 115 and 116:
These resources are identified and
- Page 117 and 118:
more of the soil series, a land nee
- Page 119 and 120:
slopes and/or retaining walls along
- Page 121 and 122:
Option 4, MD 24 Option 2, MD 543 Op
- Page 123 and 124:
Alternatives is primarily due to th
- Page 125 and 126:
2. Wetlands Wetland identification
- Page 127 and 128:
management retention area in the so
- Page 129 and 130:
would be permanently impacted as a
- Page 131 and 132:
County obtains surface water direct
- Page 133 and 134:
Existing culverts, culvert extensio
- Page 135 and 136:
River, Bynum Run, and Swan Creek wa
- Page 137 and 138:
The Maryland Reforestation Act requ
- Page 139 and 140:
• Maintain forest habitat as clos
- Page 141 and 142:
Table III-17. Alternative Impacts t
- Page 143 and 144:
Table III-17. Alternative Impacts t
- Page 145 and 146:
the country are each given one of t
- Page 147 and 148:
localized emissions impacts. Projec
- Page 149 and 150:
eduction in the sulfur content of h
- Page 151 and 152:
EPA adopted its second MSAT Rule in
- Page 153 and 154:
emission factors for a specific veh
- Page 155 and 156:
measure of or benchmark for local e
- Page 157 and 158:
details regarding the NSAs can be f
- Page 159 and 160:
NSA 14 contains single family resid
- Page 161 and 162:
NSA 26 consists of single family re
- Page 163 and 164:
Table III-20. Short-term Noise Meas
- Page 165 and 166:
Table III-20. Short-term Noise Meas
- Page 167 and 168:
Table III-20. Short-term Noise Meas
- Page 169 and 170:
Table III-20. Short-term Noise Meas
- Page 171 and 172:
Table III-21. Noise Abatement Crite
- Page 173 and 174:
Table III-22 Predicted Noise Levels
- Page 175 and 176:
Table III-22 Predicted Noise Levels
- Page 177 and 178:
Table III-22 Predicted Noise Levels
- Page 179 and 180:
Table III-22 Predicted Noise Levels
- Page 181 and 182:
Alternative has a slightly smaller
- Page 183 and 184:
Table III-24. Summary of Noise Abat
- Page 185 and 186:
Alternative. For the Express Toll L
- Page 187 and 188:
162,864 SF. Using a unit cost of $1
- Page 189 and 190:
The cost per benefited residence is
- Page 191 and 192:
esidences and provides a minimum of
- Page 193 and 194:
to 3 lanes (each direction) in 1973
- Page 195 and 196:
will be completed for the new NSA.
- Page 197 and 198:
Table III-26: ICE Resources and Eff
- Page 199:
enhancing the character of existing
- Page 202 and 203:
that they have remained unchanged f
- Page 204 and 205:
ensure that avoidance and minimizat
- Page 206 and 207:
and incentives, as previously ident
- Page 208 and 209:
Table IV-1. Focus Group Member List
- Page 210 and 211:
Over 250 people attended two I-95 O
- Page 212:
• The preliminary concepts carrie