Best practices Database for Living Labs - ALCOTRA - Innovation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 13: List of ENoLL member countries (from: www.openlivinglabs.eu) As the next two diagrams display, 83% of Living Labs (or 227) come from EU27 countries, 17% (or 47) from non-EU and international countries. Within these latter, 34% (or 16 Living Labs) are from South America, 24% (or 11) from Europe (non-EU), 19% (or 9) from Asia (especially China and Taiwan), 15% (or 7) from North America and 2% (or 1) from Oceania. Thus, all the six continents are currently represented in ENoLL, which is due to the particular openness and inclusion policies followed by this association since the ‘3 rd wave’ call: then, it was decided that applications as associate members would be accepted from all over the world, a policy that has continued ever since. The project is co-funded by the ERDF Page 26 of 78
Figure 14: Geographical distribution of ENoLL, EU27 and non-EU members (source: ENoLL database) 4.2 Age Clusters In the application form, each candidate to ENoLL membership has to specify the year of foundation. The next diagram displays how the 274 Living Labs distribute themselves according to this parameter. As it can be seen, the overwhelming majority did not exist before 2006, when the EC Presidency launched the socalled ‘Helsinki Manifesto’. Figure 15: Age distribution of ENoLL members (source: ENoLL database) Quite understandably, as the next two diagrams show, the above represented trend (reaching a peak in 2008, then slowing down) is pushed by the dynamics of the EU27 Living Labs, which are about four fifths of the overall population. The project is co-funded by the ERDF Page 27 of 78
Page 1 and 2: Alcotra Innovation project Delivera
Page 3 and 4: Preface For the study and creation
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 7
Page 7 and 8: 1. Introduction Much has been writt
Page 9 and 10: 2. Living Labs as Territorial Innov
Page 11 and 12: (from a public authority’s viewpo
Page 13 and 14: • People (User) Integration in De
Page 15 and 16: 3.1 The FormIT Process The FormIT p
Page 17 and 18: Figure 7: Sample Living Lab’s tri
Page 19 and 20: 3.4 The Technological Platform Mode
Page 21 and 22: Figure 10: Living Labs as Functiona
Page 23 and 24: Figure 11: The Living Lab Innovatio
Page 25: • Openness: the innovation proces
Page 29 and 30: scanned for the identification of t
Page 31 and 32: Turning now our attention to the e-
Page 33 and 34: Figure 23: Relative performance of
Page 35 and 36: Figure 24: Key Profiles of Living L
Page 37 and 38: Figure 25: Key Profiles of Living L
Page 39 and 40: 6. References [1] Molinari, F. 2011
Page 41 and 42: Annex A: Full Database of ENoLL Mem
Page 43 and 44: France OFF-ROAD MEMORY Living Lab w
Page 45 and 46: Slovenia LENS Living Lab www.einova
Page 47 and 48: The project is co-funded by the ERD
Page 61 and 62: TABLE OF CONTENTS 7. INTRODUCTION 6
Page 63 and 64: 8. Ownership of existing Living Lab
Page 65 and 66: 10. ENoLL evaluation criteria In th
Page 67 and 68: 12. Extension of existing database
Page 69 and 70: 13.4 Organisation and Governance Th
Page 71 and 72: Figure 28: spider-web diagram The t
Page 73 and 74: SME Innovation Support Figure 35: S
Page 75 and 76: As it can be seen the new database
Page 77 and 78:
In order to search for specific rec
show all

Best practices Database for Living Labs - ALCOTRA - Innovation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?