Best practices Database for Living Labs - ALCOTRA - Innovation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Infrastructure Figure 31: Infrastructure Organisation and Governance Figure 32: Organisation and Governance Innovation Outcomes Figure 33: Innovation Outcomes Methods and Tools Figure 34: Methods and Tools The project is co-funded by the ERDF Page 72 of 78
SME Innovation Support Figure 35: SME Innovation Support 14. Current status of CO-LLABS Living Labs The analysis of 21 in CO-LLABS identified Living Labs shows that the status of these Living Labs can already be classified as good. Most of the Living Labs are rather mature in the field of user involvement as well as methods & tools. The other dimensions are balanced at almost 50%. Figure 36: Current status of CO-LLABS Living Labs 15. Further extension of the Indicators regarding the Alcotra goals The Indicators presented so far have been mainly streamlined according to the idea to access to some extend the capabilities of a living lab regarding the main dimensions that a living lab have to fulfil from a functional point of view. However for Alcotra the trans-nationality of the living lab approach is an important aspect (also backed-up by Harald Botha from Nordforsk in the Genoa meeting). While Living Labs can exist only in a particular spot the common history of co-operating regions, regardless of national borders, plays an important part in today’s open innovation environments like Living Labs. In order to measure the trans-nationality of a living lab an indicator was introduced measuring mainly how tight the trans-national cooperation between Living Labs is. This indicator measures the degree of cooperation that the Living Lab is involved in. Higher percentages can be achieved if e.g. a Living Lab participated in an exchange of information in workshops, if their a common Info-workshops with other Living Labs or if there is cooperation with other Living Labs. The following picture shows the definition of the Indicator. The project is co-funded by the ERDF Page 73 of 78
Page 1 and 2:
Alcotra Innovation project Delivera
Page 3 and 4:
Preface For the study and creation
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 7
Page 7 and 8:
1. Introduction Much has been writt
Page 9 and 10:
2. Living Labs as Territorial Innov
Page 11 and 12:
(from a public authority’s viewpo
Page 13 and 14:
• People (User) Integration in De
Page 15 and 16:
3.1 The FormIT Process The FormIT p
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 7: Sample Living Lab’s tri
Page 19 and 20:
3.4 The Technological Platform Mode
Page 21 and 22: Figure 10: Living Labs as Functiona
Page 23 and 24: Figure 11: The Living Lab Innovatio
Page 25 and 26: • Openness: the innovation proces
Page 27 and 28: Figure 14: Geographical distributio
Page 29 and 30: scanned for the identification of t
Page 31 and 32: Turning now our attention to the e-
Page 33 and 34: Figure 23: Relative performance of
Page 35 and 36: Figure 24: Key Profiles of Living L
Page 37 and 38: Figure 25: Key Profiles of Living L
Page 39 and 40: 6. References [1] Molinari, F. 2011
Page 41 and 42: Annex A: Full Database of ENoLL Mem
Page 43 and 44: France OFF-ROAD MEMORY Living Lab w
Page 45 and 46: Slovenia LENS Living Lab www.einova
Page 47 and 48: The project is co-funded by the ERD
Page 61 and 62: TABLE OF CONTENTS 7. INTRODUCTION 6
Page 63 and 64: 8. Ownership of existing Living Lab
Page 65 and 66: 10. ENoLL evaluation criteria In th
Page 67 and 68: 12. Extension of existing database
Page 69 and 70: 13.4 Organisation and Governance Th
Page 71: Figure 28: spider-web diagram The t
Page 75 and 76: As it can be seen the new database
Page 77 and 78: In order to search for specific rec
show all

Best practices Database for Living Labs - ALCOTRA - Innovation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?