Best practices Database for Living Labs - ALCOTRA - Innovation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5. Conclusion and Future Work In this document, we have proposed a survey of all 274 Living Labs that are current members of the ENoLL, based on textual information derived, when available, from the individual self-descriptions delivered by the candidates to the various ENoLL “waves”, otherwise from the Living Lab profiles that are published on the www.openlivinglabs.eu website. We have clustered the results in aggregate form (by country, maturity, thematic domain, nature of the leading organization), thus avoiding the risk of disclosure of confidential or simply personal data that was not already public or confirmed by other independent sources (especially the respective Living Lab websites). While this approach may lend itself to some criticisms, as it leaves a lot of margin to the discretional interpretation of the researcher, we believe it also comes as close as possible to what can be said to be an objective and neutral presentation of the Living Lab movement in 2011. Furthermore, given the framework of the Alcotra Innovation project, and particularly the four thematic domains of election for the participant Regions, our focus was set to the Living Labs that have characterized themselves as belonging to one or more of these domains (as multiple options were also available). The analysis of best practice is completed by an introduction to the territorial Living Lab model and by a comparison of a number of operational methodologies purporting to its concrete implementation. In the Annexes, we also provide the full listing of the current ENoLL members with their respective websites, and in addition to that, the published profiles of those Living Labs that are coming from the Alcotra Innovation regions (PACA, Piedmont and Rhone-Alpes). Next steps will be: 1. A refinement of the above analysis, spotting any mistakes and completing or enhancing the comments in support; 2. The population of the Alcotra Innovation online database (e-Atlas) with geo-referenced information about the 274 members of ENoLL – or at least those 217 that come from EU27 countries and are active in the same thematic domains, as per Table 2 above. The project is co-funded by the ERDF Page 38 of 78
6. References [1] Molinari, F. 2011. Living Labs as Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for the eGovernance of Innovation. In: Proceedings of the ICEGOV11 Conference. [2] Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V-P., and Kulkki, S. 2005. State of the Art in utilizing the Living Labs Approach to User-centric ICT Innovation – a European Approach. Unpublished manuscript. [3] Santoro, R., and Conte, M. 2009. Living Labs in Open Innovation Functional Regions. In: Proceedings of the ICE09 Conference. [4] Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, US. [5] Lahti, P., Kangasoja, J., and Huovila, P. (Eds.) 2006. Electronic and Mobile Participation in City Planning and Management. Experiences from INTELCITIES an Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Union. Cases Helsinki, Tampere, Garðabær/Reykjavik and Frankfurt. Picaset Oy, Helsinki - ISBN 952-473-646-2. [6] http://www.freeband.nl [7] Schaffers, H., Guerrero Cordoba, M., Hongisto, P., Kallai, T., Merz, C. , and van Rensburg, J. 2007. Exploring Business Models for Open Innovation in Rural Living Labs. In: 13 th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, Sophia-Antipolis, France, 4- 6 June, pp. 13 ff. [8] Schaffers, H., and Kulkki, S. 2007. Living Labs. An Open Innovation Concept fostering Rural Development. Tech Monitor, September-October, 30-38. [9] Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press. [10] Steins, N.A., and Edwards, V.M. 1998. Platforms for Collective Action in Multiple-Use CPRs. Paper presented at Crossing Boundaries, the 7 th Annual Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 10 th –14 th . [11] Reichart, S. 2002. Die Gestaltung des Produktinnovations prozesses. In: M. Reichert (Ed.) Prozessmanagement mit System. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Berlin. [12] Almirall, E., and Wareham, J. 2008. Living Labs and Open Innovation: Roles and Applicability. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks (eJOV), Vol. 10 “Special Issue on Living Labs”, August. [13] European Commission, Information Society and Media 2008. Study on the Potential of the Living Labs Approach including its Relation to Experimental Facilities for Future Internet related Technologies. Final Report, 30 th November. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/livinglabs/study/index_en.htm [14] Moulaert, F. and Sekia, F. 2003. Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies 37, 3, 289–302. [15] DTI 2004. Innovation through People Centred Design – Lessons from the USA. Global Watch Mission Report, October. [16] OECD 1997. Technology Incubators: Nurturing Small Firms. Paris, OECD Press. [17] Cooke, P. 2001. From Technopoles to Regional Innovation Systems: The Evolution of Localised Technology Development Policy. Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue canadienne des sciences régionales, XXIV:1 (Spring/Printemps), 21-40. [18] Moore, J.F. 1996. The Death of Competition - Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. Harper Business, New York. [19] Nachira, F., Nicolai, A., Dini, P., Le Louarn, M. and Rivera Leon, M. (Eds.) 2007. Digital Business Ecosystems. European Commission, DG INFSO, Brussels. [20] Leamer, E.E., and Storper, M. 2001. The Economic Geography of the Internet Age. Journal of International Business Studies 32, 641–665. [21] Aydalot, P. 1986. Milieux Innovateurs en Europe. GREMI, Paris. [22] Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Ihlström Eriksson, C., Ståhlbröst, A., and Svensson, J. 2009. A Milieu for Innovation - Defining Living Labs. Paper presented at the 2 nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium “Stimulating Recovery - The Role of Innovation Management”, 6-9 December 2009, in New York City, USA. [23] Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Holst, M., and Ståhlbröst, A. 2009. Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach. Paper presented at the 42 nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE. [24] Molinari, F., and Zanella, L. 2009. Living Labs for Wild Fire Prevention in Rural Environments. Proceedings of the mGov2009 conference, Barcelona, Spain. [25] Pierson, J. and Lievens, B. 2005. Configuring Living Labs for a “thick” Understanding of Innovation. Proceedings of the EPIC Conference 2005, pp. 114-127. Page 39 of 78 The project is co-funded by the ERDF
Page 1 and 2: Alcotra Innovation project Delivera
Page 3 and 4: Preface For the study and creation
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 7
Page 7 and 8: 1. Introduction Much has been writt
Page 9 and 10: 2. Living Labs as Territorial Innov
Page 11 and 12: (from a public authority’s viewpo
Page 13 and 14: • People (User) Integration in De
Page 15 and 16: 3.1 The FormIT Process The FormIT p
Page 17 and 18: Figure 7: Sample Living Lab’s tri
Page 19 and 20: 3.4 The Technological Platform Mode
Page 21 and 22: Figure 10: Living Labs as Functiona
Page 23 and 24: Figure 11: The Living Lab Innovatio
Page 25 and 26: • Openness: the innovation proces
Page 27 and 28: Figure 14: Geographical distributio
Page 29 and 30: scanned for the identification of t
Page 31 and 32: Turning now our attention to the e-
Page 33 and 34: Figure 23: Relative performance of
Page 35 and 36: Figure 24: Key Profiles of Living L
Page 37: Figure 25: Key Profiles of Living L
Page 41 and 42: Annex A: Full Database of ENoLL Mem
Page 43 and 44: France OFF-ROAD MEMORY Living Lab w
Page 45 and 46: Slovenia LENS Living Lab www.einova
Page 47 and 48: The project is co-funded by the ERD
Page 61 and 62: TABLE OF CONTENTS 7. INTRODUCTION 6
Page 63 and 64: 8. Ownership of existing Living Lab
Page 65 and 66: 10. ENoLL evaluation criteria In th
Page 67 and 68: 12. Extension of existing database
Page 69 and 70: 13.4 Organisation and Governance Th
Page 71 and 72: Figure 28: spider-web diagram The t
Page 73 and 74: SME Innovation Support Figure 35: S
Page 75 and 76: As it can be seen the new database
Page 77 and 78: In order to search for specific rec

Best practices Database for Living Labs - ALCOTRA - Innovation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?