- Page 1: DIET, NUTRITION, AND REPRODUCTIVE S
- Page 6 and 7: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to th
- Page 8 and 9: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT....
- Page 10 and 11: LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Reprodu
- Page 12 and 13: LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Study
- Page 14 and 15: LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Page A
- Page 16 and 17: INTRODUCTION Roosevelt elk (Cervus
- Page 18 and 19: Similarly, high quality habitat (ve
- Page 20 and 21: 5 deficiencies have been reported f
- Page 22 and 23: STUDY AREA The Hoko Game Management
- Page 24 and 25: acemosa), swordfern (Polystichum mu
- Page 26 and 27: 11 independence, I allowed at least
- Page 28 and 29: 13 counted calves and cows, one obs
- Page 30 and 31: communication). Riparian areas of v
- Page 32 and 33: 17 The 28 vegetation types and timb
- Page 34 and 35: could indicate forage plant groups
- Page 36 and 37: 21 of digestibility was not an exac
- Page 38 and 39: used Pearson’s correlation analys
- Page 40 and 41: RESULTS Elk Telemetry and Locations
- Page 42 and 43: 27 0.8 Calf:cow ratio Calf:cow rati
- Page 44 and 45: Five of the nine herds used vegetat
- Page 46 and 47: Table 3. Vegetation groups used les
- Page 48 and 49: 33 Table 4. Results of Mann-Whitney
- Page 50 and 51: 35 summer months. Shrub consumption
- Page 52 and 53: Table 6. Differences in median fora
- Page 54 and 55:
39 80 March/April Total grass (%) 6
- Page 56 and 57:
Nutritional Analysis of Forage Plan
- Page 58 and 59:
IVDMD (%) IVDMD (%) IVDMD (%) 80 60
- Page 60 and 61:
DE (Kcal/g) DE (Kcal/g) DE (Kcal/g)
- Page 62 and 63:
0.6 47 0.5 Calf survival (%) Mean c
- Page 64 and 65:
Table 7. Summary of principal compo
- Page 66 and 67:
Table 8. Summary of multiple regres
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 10. Summary of multiple regre
- Page 70 and 71:
Birthrate was negatively related to
- Page 72 and 73:
DISCUSSION Highly productive herds
- Page 74 and 75:
consumption of evergreen shrubs, wi
- Page 76 and 77:
61 Therefore, low percentages of gr
- Page 78 and 79:
63 been able to gain adequate weigh
- Page 80 and 81:
65 survival but few calves overall,
- Page 82 and 83:
2004), highly nutritious forage pla
- Page 84 and 85:
egardless of home range size. There
- Page 86 and 87:
71 However, it is possible to have
- Page 88 and 89:
73 Cook, J. G., B. K. Johnson, R. C
- Page 90 and 91:
75 Hudson, R. J. and J. Z. Adamczew
- Page 92 and 93:
Phillips, G. E. and A. W. Alldredge
- Page 94 and 95:
APPENDICES 79
- Page 96 and 97:
Appendix A. Vegetation types and st
- Page 98 and 99:
Appendix C. Coefficient of Associat
- Page 100 and 101:
Appendix E. Percentage of each vege
- Page 102 and 103:
Appendix F. Diet of nine elk herds
- Page 104 and 105:
Appendix F. Diet of nine elk herds
- Page 106 and 107:
Appendix F. Diet of nine elk herds
- Page 108 and 109:
Appendix F. Diet of nine elk herds
- Page 110 and 111:
Appendix F. Diet of nine elk herds
- Page 112 and 113:
Appendix G. Total percentage of nin
- Page 114 and 115:
99 Appendix I. Multiple regression
- Page 116 and 117:
101 Appendix K. Correlations betwee
- Page 118 and 119:
Appendix M. Multiple regression ana