& Albany County Post - The Altamont Enterprise
& Albany County Post - The Altamont Enterprise
& Albany County Post - The Altamont Enterprise
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Altamont</strong> <strong>Enterprise</strong> – Thursday, December 20, 2012 9<br />
A month after building defeat, library board flummoxed on future<br />
By Tyler Murphy<br />
VOORHEESVILLE — A month<br />
after a record number of district<br />
voters cast ballots against a library<br />
building project, the board<br />
of trustees is still collecting information<br />
and seeking consensus<br />
about what to do next.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Dec. 17 meeting was the<br />
board’s first since voters defeated<br />
a Nov. 13 referendum to build a<br />
$7.6 million library. Of the 1,778<br />
votes cast, 1,446 voted against<br />
the measure and 332 voted in<br />
favor.<br />
<strong>The</strong> project would have nearly<br />
doubled the library taxes on an<br />
assessed $200,000 home in New<br />
Scotland, from the current rate of<br />
about $252 a year to about $478<br />
a year — $226 higher during the<br />
first year of the 20-year bond.<br />
<strong>The</strong> project also would have to<br />
raise annual operating costs by<br />
$246,750.<br />
“So does anybody here actually<br />
know what they want to<br />
do next?” Library Director Gail<br />
Sacco asked the board during<br />
Monday’s meeting.<br />
A few members responded inaudibly<br />
by shaking their heads<br />
followed by President Robert<br />
Kent responding, “I don’t.”<br />
At Monday’s meeting, former<br />
library trustee and building<br />
committee member Dick Ramsey<br />
sat with the board in discussing<br />
the vote.<br />
He pointed out that double the<br />
number of voters came out for<br />
the library’s referendum then<br />
the latest school budget vote,<br />
something he said never happened<br />
before.<br />
“You don’t get this many people<br />
to turn out for this kind of vote<br />
unless someone did something.<br />
I had several people in front of<br />
me voting for the first time,” said<br />
Ramsey, adding that efforts by<br />
organized groups opposed to the<br />
vote had succeeded in influencing<br />
participation.<br />
“I don’t think it was just an<br />
organized effort. I think there<br />
was overwhelming consensus on:<br />
‘We don’t want anymore taxes,’”<br />
said Trustee Janna Shillinglaw.<br />
Like several others on the board<br />
Shillinglaw mentioned tough economic<br />
times were partly to blame<br />
for the referendum’s resounding<br />
defeat.<br />
“People have no control over<br />
a lot of things, like gas prices,<br />
but they do have control over a<br />
building project,” she said.<br />
Sacco said the project was defeated<br />
because of the “economy<br />
and the lack of knowledge.” She<br />
went on, “<strong>The</strong> idea that people<br />
think of the library as a building<br />
for books; they don’t think<br />
of eReaders or librarians that<br />
have masters degrees, or about<br />
our data bases, or the morning<br />
program for preschoolers or the<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Enterprise</strong> — Tyler Murphy<br />
Project rejection: Voorheesville Public Library Board President Robert Kent, left, and Library Director<br />
Gail Sacco, far right, listen to discussions about the library’s defeated building project referendum.<br />
In a record-setting turnout on Nov. 13 voters defeated the measure. Kent urged members to keep public<br />
sentiment in mind as they consider the library’s next step.<br />
grants we get, or the homebound<br />
program for people confined in<br />
their house for long periods of<br />
time, or our gallery space. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
don’t know what’s here.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> director said she had received<br />
a number of notes from<br />
residents saying “the reason was<br />
the money, not the design or the<br />
lack of understanding.”<br />
“You have a hard time making<br />
the connection for people<br />
who don’t use the library,” said<br />
Trustee Stella Suib, agreeing the<br />
role of the library has expanded<br />
beyond book collections.<br />
Suib said the library was a<br />
“community hub,” especially for<br />
schoolchildren and the elderly<br />
who don’t always have technology<br />
or other resources at home.<br />
<strong>The</strong> defeated project would<br />
have purchased new property<br />
along the <strong>Altamont</strong>–Voorheesville<br />
Road (Route 156), across<br />
the street from the Voorheesville<br />
firehouse and elementary school.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposal would have doubled<br />
the current library space to<br />
19,000 square feet, though the<br />
room for book collection would<br />
have increased by only about 10<br />
percent, leaving the remaining<br />
area available for more technology<br />
and programs.<br />
“That’s the thing about it, it’s<br />
about the kids and the future. If<br />
you get it right the first time, it’s<br />
right for the future,” added Ramsey,<br />
saying the library proposal<br />
was designed to grow with the<br />
town. He said the areas around<br />
New Scotland had seen rapid<br />
and large-scale development<br />
and believes it’s only a matter<br />
of time before the town begins<br />
to experience the same.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> town of New Scotland is<br />
not going to stay 10,000 people 10<br />
miles from <strong>Albany</strong>,” he said.<br />
Reality check<br />
As board president, Kent made<br />
few remarks about the defeated<br />
project during the discussion but<br />
urged members to heed public<br />
feedback.<br />
“I think there was overwhelming consensus on:<br />
‘We don’t want anymore taxes.”<br />
“We developed an open and<br />
honest process. We gave the community<br />
an opportunity to get informed,<br />
if they wanted to or not,<br />
and they voted — they voted no.<br />
This is a democracy this is how<br />
it’s suppose to work and now we<br />
need to move on,” said Kent.<br />
<strong>The</strong> board decided to wait for<br />
the final results of a feedback<br />
survey to be finished before making<br />
any decisions. Sacco said the<br />
library had contacted a number<br />
of volunteers and others in an<br />
effort to understand people’s<br />
individual feelings on the failed<br />
project and gain a better grasp<br />
of public expectations.<br />
Kent told board members<br />
there is still time to contact additional<br />
residents to participate<br />
in the survey.<br />
“We need samples to help our<br />
reality check,” said Kent.<br />
“We need time to think about<br />
this. It’s been a long process<br />
and needs considerable consideration,”<br />
added Trustee Rita<br />
Stein.<br />
Initial planning discussion for<br />
the defeated project began in<br />
2005, said Kent.<br />
<strong>The</strong> board agreed to retract<br />
a $1,000 hold on the parcel of<br />
land where the proposed project<br />
was to be built. <strong>The</strong> money will<br />
be returned to the library, said<br />
Sacco, and the property will go<br />
up for sale.<br />
<strong>The</strong> library is still eligible for<br />
the next three years, to receive<br />
a $51,000 state grant awarded<br />
for the purchase of property. “It’s<br />
there until the board has a better<br />
idea on how it wants to move<br />
forward,” said Sacco.<br />
Library officials said demand<br />
for services had been growing<br />
and the current structure, built<br />
in 1989, was unable to expand<br />
or keep up with changing technology.<br />
What’s next<br />
Trustee Rebecca Pahl told the<br />
public at a previous meeting the<br />
board had resisted investing too<br />
much in the old building over<br />
the last few years because it was<br />
preparing for the new project.<br />
She said the current building,<br />
assessed at $645,000, needed a<br />
million dollars worth of repairs,<br />
which includes replacing the<br />
roof.<br />
Pending needs at the current<br />
library were not discussed at<br />
the meeting but Sacco told <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>Enterprise</strong> more details on how<br />
the board would address those<br />
concerns would be developed<br />
over the next three months as it<br />
prepares next year’s budget. She<br />
said the building had been maintained<br />
well but a few looming<br />
projects could have considerable<br />
expenses, such as a roof repair.<br />
“It all depends on how the<br />
board decides to proceed,” she<br />
said.<br />
She added, “I think board<br />
members are community residents<br />
who care about the library<br />
and about community they live<br />
in. <strong>The</strong>y are being very thoughtful<br />
and careful about moving<br />
forward and making sure they<br />
are hearing what the public has<br />
said.”<br />
PROPANE<br />
Compare<br />
Our Rate<br />
www.margaslp.com<br />
24 Hour Service • Automatic Delivery • Fireplaces<br />
Appliances • Water Heaters • Heating Systems<br />
MAR-GAS<br />
LP SERVICE INC.<br />
Residential & Commercial<br />
Serving <strong>Albany</strong> & Greene Counties<br />
141 C.R. 406, South Westerlo<br />
Low<br />
Prices<br />
Radio Dispatched 966-8426