01.11.2014 Views

& Albany County Post - The Altamont Enterprise

& Albany County Post - The Altamont Enterprise

& Albany County Post - The Altamont Enterprise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Altamont</strong> <strong>Enterprise</strong> – Thursday, December 20, 2012 9<br />

A month after building defeat, library board flummoxed on future<br />

By Tyler Murphy<br />

VOORHEESVILLE — A month<br />

after a record number of district<br />

voters cast ballots against a library<br />

building project, the board<br />

of trustees is still collecting information<br />

and seeking consensus<br />

about what to do next.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dec. 17 meeting was the<br />

board’s first since voters defeated<br />

a Nov. 13 referendum to build a<br />

$7.6 million library. Of the 1,778<br />

votes cast, 1,446 voted against<br />

the measure and 332 voted in<br />

favor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> project would have nearly<br />

doubled the library taxes on an<br />

assessed $200,000 home in New<br />

Scotland, from the current rate of<br />

about $252 a year to about $478<br />

a year — $226 higher during the<br />

first year of the 20-year bond.<br />

<strong>The</strong> project also would have to<br />

raise annual operating costs by<br />

$246,750.<br />

“So does anybody here actually<br />

know what they want to<br />

do next?” Library Director Gail<br />

Sacco asked the board during<br />

Monday’s meeting.<br />

A few members responded inaudibly<br />

by shaking their heads<br />

followed by President Robert<br />

Kent responding, “I don’t.”<br />

At Monday’s meeting, former<br />

library trustee and building<br />

committee member Dick Ramsey<br />

sat with the board in discussing<br />

the vote.<br />

He pointed out that double the<br />

number of voters came out for<br />

the library’s referendum then<br />

the latest school budget vote,<br />

something he said never happened<br />

before.<br />

“You don’t get this many people<br />

to turn out for this kind of vote<br />

unless someone did something.<br />

I had several people in front of<br />

me voting for the first time,” said<br />

Ramsey, adding that efforts by<br />

organized groups opposed to the<br />

vote had succeeded in influencing<br />

participation.<br />

“I don’t think it was just an<br />

organized effort. I think there<br />

was overwhelming consensus on:<br />

‘We don’t want anymore taxes,’”<br />

said Trustee Janna Shillinglaw.<br />

Like several others on the board<br />

Shillinglaw mentioned tough economic<br />

times were partly to blame<br />

for the referendum’s resounding<br />

defeat.<br />

“People have no control over<br />

a lot of things, like gas prices,<br />

but they do have control over a<br />

building project,” she said.<br />

Sacco said the project was defeated<br />

because of the “economy<br />

and the lack of knowledge.” She<br />

went on, “<strong>The</strong> idea that people<br />

think of the library as a building<br />

for books; they don’t think<br />

of eReaders or librarians that<br />

have masters degrees, or about<br />

our data bases, or the morning<br />

program for preschoolers or the<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Enterprise</strong> — Tyler Murphy<br />

Project rejection: Voorheesville Public Library Board President Robert Kent, left, and Library Director<br />

Gail Sacco, far right, listen to discussions about the library’s defeated building project referendum.<br />

In a record-setting turnout on Nov. 13 voters defeated the measure. Kent urged members to keep public<br />

sentiment in mind as they consider the library’s next step.<br />

grants we get, or the homebound<br />

program for people confined in<br />

their house for long periods of<br />

time, or our gallery space. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

don’t know what’s here.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> director said she had received<br />

a number of notes from<br />

residents saying “the reason was<br />

the money, not the design or the<br />

lack of understanding.”<br />

“You have a hard time making<br />

the connection for people<br />

who don’t use the library,” said<br />

Trustee Stella Suib, agreeing the<br />

role of the library has expanded<br />

beyond book collections.<br />

Suib said the library was a<br />

“community hub,” especially for<br />

schoolchildren and the elderly<br />

who don’t always have technology<br />

or other resources at home.<br />

<strong>The</strong> defeated project would<br />

have purchased new property<br />

along the <strong>Altamont</strong>–Voorheesville<br />

Road (Route 156), across<br />

the street from the Voorheesville<br />

firehouse and elementary school.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposal would have doubled<br />

the current library space to<br />

19,000 square feet, though the<br />

room for book collection would<br />

have increased by only about 10<br />

percent, leaving the remaining<br />

area available for more technology<br />

and programs.<br />

“That’s the thing about it, it’s<br />

about the kids and the future. If<br />

you get it right the first time, it’s<br />

right for the future,” added Ramsey,<br />

saying the library proposal<br />

was designed to grow with the<br />

town. He said the areas around<br />

New Scotland had seen rapid<br />

and large-scale development<br />

and believes it’s only a matter<br />

of time before the town begins<br />

to experience the same.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> town of New Scotland is<br />

not going to stay 10,000 people 10<br />

miles from <strong>Albany</strong>,” he said.<br />

Reality check<br />

As board president, Kent made<br />

few remarks about the defeated<br />

project during the discussion but<br />

urged members to heed public<br />

feedback.<br />

“I think there was overwhelming consensus on:<br />

‘We don’t want anymore taxes.”<br />

“We developed an open and<br />

honest process. We gave the community<br />

an opportunity to get informed,<br />

if they wanted to or not,<br />

and they voted — they voted no.<br />

This is a democracy this is how<br />

it’s suppose to work and now we<br />

need to move on,” said Kent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> board decided to wait for<br />

the final results of a feedback<br />

survey to be finished before making<br />

any decisions. Sacco said the<br />

library had contacted a number<br />

of volunteers and others in an<br />

effort to understand people’s<br />

individual feelings on the failed<br />

project and gain a better grasp<br />

of public expectations.<br />

Kent told board members<br />

there is still time to contact additional<br />

residents to participate<br />

in the survey.<br />

“We need samples to help our<br />

reality check,” said Kent.<br />

“We need time to think about<br />

this. It’s been a long process<br />

and needs considerable consideration,”<br />

added Trustee Rita<br />

Stein.<br />

Initial planning discussion for<br />

the defeated project began in<br />

2005, said Kent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> board agreed to retract<br />

a $1,000 hold on the parcel of<br />

land where the proposed project<br />

was to be built. <strong>The</strong> money will<br />

be returned to the library, said<br />

Sacco, and the property will go<br />

up for sale.<br />

<strong>The</strong> library is still eligible for<br />

the next three years, to receive<br />

a $51,000 state grant awarded<br />

for the purchase of property. “It’s<br />

there until the board has a better<br />

idea on how it wants to move<br />

forward,” said Sacco.<br />

Library officials said demand<br />

for services had been growing<br />

and the current structure, built<br />

in 1989, was unable to expand<br />

or keep up with changing technology.<br />

What’s next<br />

Trustee Rebecca Pahl told the<br />

public at a previous meeting the<br />

board had resisted investing too<br />

much in the old building over<br />

the last few years because it was<br />

preparing for the new project.<br />

She said the current building,<br />

assessed at $645,000, needed a<br />

million dollars worth of repairs,<br />

which includes replacing the<br />

roof.<br />

Pending needs at the current<br />

library were not discussed at<br />

the meeting but Sacco told <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Enterprise</strong> more details on how<br />

the board would address those<br />

concerns would be developed<br />

over the next three months as it<br />

prepares next year’s budget. She<br />

said the building had been maintained<br />

well but a few looming<br />

projects could have considerable<br />

expenses, such as a roof repair.<br />

“It all depends on how the<br />

board decides to proceed,” she<br />

said.<br />

She added, “I think board<br />

members are community residents<br />

who care about the library<br />

and about community they live<br />

in. <strong>The</strong>y are being very thoughtful<br />

and careful about moving<br />

forward and making sure they<br />

are hearing what the public has<br />

said.”<br />

PROPANE<br />

Compare<br />

Our Rate<br />

www.margaslp.com<br />

24 Hour Service • Automatic Delivery • Fireplaces<br />

Appliances • Water Heaters • Heating Systems<br />

MAR-GAS<br />

LP SERVICE INC.<br />

Residential & Commercial<br />

Serving <strong>Albany</strong> & Greene Counties<br />

141 C.R. 406, South Westerlo<br />

Low<br />

Prices<br />

Radio Dispatched 966-8426

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!