all the food that's fit to print The Education Issue - Slow Food
all the food that's fit to print The Education Issue - Slow Food
all the food that's fit to print The Education Issue - Slow Food
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Dear Members,<br />
I confess: I like when things are a<br />
mess. More precisely, I am attracted<br />
<strong>to</strong> things that are complex, ambiguous,<br />
ch<strong>all</strong>enging. Maybe that’s why I<br />
like studying <strong>food</strong>. When it comes <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>food</strong>, <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ry is always messy, especi<strong>all</strong>y<br />
when you’re trying <strong>to</strong> get at <strong>the</strong><br />
truth.<br />
Take <strong>the</strong> New York Times’s recent<br />
report on mercury levels in tuna<br />
From Erika<br />
(January 23, 2008). I’m always hopeful<br />
when <strong>food</strong> issues jump from <strong>the</strong><br />
Dining section <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> front page, not<br />
only because more people read about <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>re, but also because <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
is more likely <strong>to</strong> integrate political, economic and ecological dimensions,<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than recipes or wine pairings. But in this case, no word count or headline<br />
could do justice <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>pic, because <strong>the</strong> truth is, a real discussion of<br />
tuna can’t just be about what quantity is safe <strong>to</strong> eat according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> EPA.<br />
What about <strong>the</strong> imminent collapse of worldwide tuna populations,<br />
endemic pollution of <strong>the</strong> oceans (and <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> plants and animals in it, especi<strong>all</strong>y<br />
those high on <strong>the</strong> <strong>food</strong> chain like tuna), sea<strong>food</strong>’s paradoxic<strong>all</strong>y robust<br />
reputation as a health <strong>food</strong>, deep-sea sport fishing, <strong>the</strong> ubiqui<strong>to</strong>us tuna<br />
melt? What about <strong>the</strong> longevity of <strong>the</strong> Japanese, who eat more bluefin tuna<br />
than anyone worldwide, or <strong>the</strong> dying tradition of <strong>the</strong> mattanza, <strong>the</strong> centuriesold<br />
hunt for bluefin off <strong>the</strong> coast of Sicily?<br />
Messy indeed. Fortunately, <strong>food</strong> writers are not alone in studying <strong>the</strong><br />
most complicated <strong>food</strong> questions any more: now farmers and <strong>food</strong> producers,<br />
college students and professors, white-tablecloth chefs and lunch ladies,<br />
environmentalists and capitalists are <strong>all</strong> getting in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> game, trying <strong>to</strong><br />
understand how <strong>to</strong> connect <strong>the</strong> dots. A few of <strong>the</strong>m are profiled in this issue,<br />
along with <strong>the</strong>ir efforts <strong>to</strong> use education—in <strong>all</strong> its forms—<strong>to</strong> demystify<br />
what is at once universal and inscrutable: what we put on our plates and in<br />
our bellies everyday.<br />
Studying <strong>food</strong> is undeniably a complex and interdisciplinary act. When<br />
we figure out how <strong>to</strong> put <strong>the</strong> true and messy s<strong>to</strong>ry of <strong>food</strong> on every newspaper’s<br />
front page, every single day, we’ll be that much closer <strong>to</strong> knowing who<br />
we are, from what we eat.<br />
Buon appeti<strong>to</strong>!<br />
Erika Lesser<br />
<strong>The</strong> snail | spring 2008<br />
3