02.11.2014 Views

Download File Course Material - Annex 2.1 - UNIDO-ICAMT

Download File Course Material - Annex 2.1 - UNIDO-ICAMT

Download File Course Material - Annex 2.1 - UNIDO-ICAMT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Human Resources Accounting Practices<br />

Real assets will not appreciate much as businesses get commoditized. Innovation and intellectual power are going to be<br />

the key to the future." - Mohandas Pai, Chief Financial Officer, Infosys.<br />

"Employees are the most valuable resources of comparison in the service (software, banking, management consultancy,<br />

etc.) sector. Like all other resources of the company, the employees possess value because of providing future services." -<br />

- Samrat Gupta, MIS Manager, DSQ Software Ltd.<br />

Valuing Human Resources<br />

In the financial year 1995-96, Infosys Technologies (Infosys) became the first software company to value its human<br />

resources in India. The company used the Lev & Schwartz Model and valued its human resources assets at Rs 1.86 billion.<br />

Infosys had always given utmost importance to the role of employees in contributing to the company's success. Analysts<br />

felt that human resources accounting (HRA) was a step further in Infosys' focusing on its employees. Narayana Murthy<br />

(Murthy), the then chairman and managing director of Infosys, said: "Comparing this figure over the years will tell us<br />

whether the value of our human resources is appreciating or not. For a knowledge intensive company like ours, that is<br />

vital information."<br />

The concept of HRA was not new in India. HRA was pioneered by public sector companies like Bharat Heavy Electronics<br />

Ltd. (BHEL) and Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) way back in the 1970s. However, the concept did not gain much<br />

popularity and acceptance during that time.<br />

It was only in the mid-1990s, after Infosys started valuing its employees, that the concept gained popularity in India. By<br />

2002, HR accounting had been introduced by leading software companies like Satyam Computers and DSQ Software, as<br />

well as leading manufacturing firms like Reliance Industries.<br />

HR managers were quick to respond on the above developments by stating that more and more organizations had now<br />

started to realize the importance of skilled workforce. They felt that to be successful in highly competitive markets,<br />

companies require to continuously improve the level of performance of their workforce.<br />

HRA enabled companies to understand whether the skill sets of their human capital was appreciating or not. R.<br />

Krishnaswamy, an actuarial accountant, said, "The value can be used internally by an organization to make comparisons<br />

from unit to unit, from year to year, as well as within its industry."<br />

Stock market analysts felt that the 'comprehensive disclosure policy' was becoming a differentiating factor among<br />

companies in various industries. Yezdi H. Malegam, managing director, S.B. Billimoria & Company commented, "In the<br />

last few years, people are realizing that their intangible assets are worth much more than their tangible ones. Now an<br />

attempt is being made to put a value to these intangibles, and to bring these hidden values to book."<br />

Analysts felt that HRA was an investor-friendly disclosure, and assured stakeholders that the company had the right<br />

human capital to meet its future business requirements.<br />

Background Note<br />

The assets of an organization could be broadly classified into tangible and intangible assets. Tangible assets referred to all<br />

the physical assets which could be presented in the balance sheet including plant and machinery, investments in securities,<br />

inventories, cash, cash equivalents and bank balance, marketable securities, accounts and notes receivables, finance<br />

receivables, equipment on operating leases, etc.<br />

59


Intangible assets included the goodwill, brand value and human assets of a company. The human assets involved the<br />

capabilities, knowledge, skills and talents of employees in an organization.<br />

In the past, less importance was given by organizations to value their human assets. Moreover, it was also considered<br />

difficult to value them since there were no defined parameters of valuation. Companies did not value human resources as<br />

these were never treated as an asset in the past. All investments related to employees, including salary as well as<br />

recruitment and training costs were considered as expenditures.<br />

In addition, accountants also felt that the stakeholders 2 of a company may not accept the concept of placing a monetary<br />

value on human resources.<br />

The importance and value of human assets started to be recognized in the early 1990s when there was a major increase in<br />

employment in firms in service, technology and other knowledge-based sectors 3 . In the firms in these sectors, the<br />

intangible assets, especially human resources, contributed significantly to the building of shareholder value. The critical<br />

success factor for any knowledge-based company was its skilled and intellectual workforce.<br />

HRA in Practice at Infosys<br />

Infosys' HRA model was based on the present value of the employees' future earnings with the following assumptions:<br />

• An employee's salary package included all benefits, whether direct or otherwise, earned both in India and in a<br />

foreign nation.<br />

• The additional earnings on the basis of age and group were also taken into account.<br />

To calculate the value of its human assets in 1995-96, all the 1,172 employees of Infosys were divided into five groups,<br />

based on their average age. Each group's average compensation was calculated. Infosys also calculated the compensation<br />

of each employee at retirement by using an average rate of increment...<br />

HRA - The Benefits and Hurdles<br />

The benefits of adopting HRA were manifold. It helped an organization to take managerial decisions based on the<br />

availability and the necessity of human resources. When the human resources were quantified, it gave the investors and<br />

other client’s true insights into the organization and its future potential. Proper valuation of human resources helped<br />

organizations to eliminate the negative effects of redundant labor.<br />

This, in turn, helped them to channelize the available skills, talents, knowledge and experience of their employees more<br />

efficiently. By adopting and implementing HRA in an organization, the following important information could be<br />

obtained:<br />

• Cost per employee<br />

• Human capital investment ratio<br />

• The amount of wealth created by each employee<br />

• The profit created by each employee<br />

• The ratio of salary paid to the total revenue generated<br />

• Average salary of each employee<br />

• Employee absenteeism rates<br />

• Employee turnover rate and retention rate...<br />

60


Organisational Behaviour – Case Study<br />

Vinod left Bombay for Surat on official work on 3 rd November, by 10.45 p.m. train. On the following day in Surat, Vinod<br />

received a phone call from a colleague in Bombay saying that his mother and his children had met with a car accident. He<br />

phoned back his sister in Bombay and got the details about the accident. As he felt concerned about the nature of injuries to<br />

his mother, he felt it advisable to return. He therefore, took the evening plane back to Bombay. Vinod stays in the housing<br />

colony of the company with his parents and his children. The company and its housing colony are situated at a place not<br />

easily accessible to the mainland city of Bombay. On the previous evening, when he was leaving for Surat, he had<br />

requisitioned the office car at 7.45 p.m. for commuting to the station. On the way to the station, he had picked up his mother<br />

and children from his sister’s house in the mainland city.<br />

After seeing him off at the railway station, his family members were returning to their company quarters by the same car.<br />

Half the way up, the car was hit by a truck. The driver received minor injuries. Vinod’s daughter got some bruises. His son’s<br />

jaw was badly hurt endangering one of his teeth. His mother was hurt on the face, her denture was thrown off and her ears<br />

started bleeding. The car was badly damaged. An RTO officer who was around directed the driver and Vinod’s relations to<br />

the nearest police station. From the police station the driver called the company’s Administrative Officer and informed him<br />

about the accident. Vinod’s son contacted his aunt who came and took care of the children and the mother. They were taken<br />

to a hospital where the children were treated and allowed to go, and the mother was hospitalized.<br />

The next morning that is on 4 th November, Vinod’s sister called the company’s Administrative Officer and was informed as<br />

to where Vinod could be contacted. She also called a colleague of Vinod and told him about the accident. On reaching his<br />

office on 5 th November, Vinod complained to the Chief Executive about the neglect and lack of concern shown by the<br />

administration regarding the accident. The Administrative Officer had not taken any immediate action consequent to the<br />

driver’s phone call. Vinod also complained that while commuting to the office that morning by the company’s bus. The<br />

Administrative Officer confirmed that he received the driver’s phone call at 11.30 p.m. He maintained that the driver had said<br />

that he had been slightly injured where after he had talked to the police sub-inspector on duty, who also informed him that the<br />

driver and Vinod’s son had received minor injuries; and that he would release the driver and the car immediately.<br />

The Administrative Officer further contended that the driver did not ask to be picked up also that he did not know that<br />

Vinod’s mother was also in the car and that she had been badly hurt. The driver submitted his report the next evening.<br />

The driver contended that after phoning the Administrative Officer from the police station, he went back to the car at the site<br />

of the accident and spent the night with his injuries untreated. He said since the police officer talked to the Administrative<br />

Officer in English, he did not know what conversation took place between them. In the morning, he phoned the transport incharge,<br />

whence he was picked up and the car towed to the company premises. The transport in-charge, Mr. Kashyap<br />

maintained that the car and the driver were assigned for duty only upto the railway station and back. He said he also did not<br />

know that Vinod’s mother had been in the car until the driver filed his report. Nor, he said, did he notice Vinod on the bus on<br />

the morning of 5 th November.<br />

On 6 th November, the Chief Executive received a memorandum from the Employees Association of the company<br />

complaining about the inaction of the Administrative Officer concerning the accident.<br />

QUESTIONS:<br />

(a) Identify the human relations problems in the case.<br />

(b) It is possible to deal with the problem through formal procedures? What are the likely consequences of dealing with<br />

it formally?<br />

(c) What may be other methods of resolving the problem?<br />

(d) What kind of behavioural change is required on the part of different functionaries involved?


Case on Personality: Hazards of Hills<br />

This case is based on an actual incident which took place in an Army Unit deployed in field area. A part of a Battery (about<br />

¼ of an Artillery Regiment) was deployed in a snow bound high altitude area of Kashmir. This was the first time; an artillery<br />

unit was deployed in an area with roads and tracks still under development. Preparation of this area for such a deployment<br />

needed a lot of digging for guns, pits for ammunition storage, living place of the personnel, slit trenches and weapon pits for<br />

local defense against any possible enemy/ terrorists’ attack on the position, place for storage of rations, cook-house and<br />

communication trenches, etc.<br />

The total strength of the party deployed there was<br />

a) Officer – 1 (second Lieutenant with about one year service)<br />

b) Junior Commissioned Officer (JCO) - 1<br />

c) Jawans – 40<br />

The Battery Commander (BC) remained with the Regiment Headquarters at Srinagar (with the remaining part of the Battery)<br />

as per the orders of the commanding Officer. There was a vehicle with the part of the Battery which was deployed at high<br />

altitude to assist in the daily administration of the troops like collection of ration, stores for preparation of defenses, water,<br />

ferrying of personnel from one place to another. The vehicle could go only upto a limited number of places due to bad road<br />

conditions and steep gradients. Only one driver was kept for this vehicle to reduce administrative problems due to more<br />

number of personnel. The vehicle completed about 35 to 40 kms of running daily in its routine commitments.<br />

The party had just been inducted about two weeks back. The defenses were being prepared which involved lot of effort in<br />

digging of hardened ground due to the cold winter months of November. The defense stores were to be collected, once the<br />

digging was complete, from another Engineering Unit located about 5 kms to the rear. The roads were treacherous; with a<br />

number of stones and slides falling down occasionally during a drizzle due to precipitation in atmosphere, there were steep<br />

gradients, narrow roads with sheer falls on one side due to the road having been cut into the side of hills. The digging was<br />

complete by end November. In the month of December, snow fall at that location was expected any time, as it had already<br />

started snowing in the higher reaches and tops of mountains. The digging had been completed in a record time of two weeks.<br />

The party under the stewardship of the young officer had done a commendable job.<br />

In the first week of December, the only driver of the vehicle reported pain in the chest and problem in breathing. He was<br />

evacuated by helicopter the next day with instructions to inform the unit to send another driver for the vehicle. It took about<br />

three days for anyone to reach this area, with staying of two night’s enroute in order to acclimatize by stages.<br />

The detachment was to be without any driver for about three days. Another driver was detailed to proceed to this area, after<br />

having been medically examined and found fit. A day after the dispatch of the driver, the young officer with this party arrived<br />

in the unit and reported that the vehicle had fallen from a hill-side road and was completely damaged.<br />

The officer was in a complete state of disarray and shock. What actually had happened goes something like this. After the<br />

first driver of the vehicle was evacuated, the weather started turning bad and it seemed that it was going to snow that day.<br />

The officer realized that in case of snow fall all the efforts put in by the troops would go waste, if the dug-ins were not<br />

covered.<br />

Realizing this, he borrowed a driver of an ambulance from a local medical unit to direct his vehicle for collection of defense<br />

stores. After the stores had been collected and dumped at the site of defenses, the vehicle was being driven back to the party’s<br />

location. Before it could reach this location, it had to negotiate a dusty and steep track. At a steep climb the vehicle stalled<br />

and got switched off. All the men got down, prevented the vehicle from reversing by putting stones behind the wheels and<br />

started checking what had gone wrong. After the check on the engine had been carried out, the bonnet cover slipped off the<br />

hands of the driver while closing it and fell to closing position with a bang. Because of the jerk thus created, the stones placed


ehind the vehicle slipped off. It was later discovered that there was glassy smooth layer of ice under the thin layer of dirt<br />

which could not hold the stones firmly and they slipped off, with the result that the vehicle moved backwards and toppled<br />

thrice and stopped upside down because of the obstruction created by a big boulder. As there was no one in the vehicle, there<br />

were no injuries to personnel. On close inspection by the officer, it was found that the vehicle body, cabin, bonnet, steering<br />

wheel and two of the four wheels were badly damaged. The officer, being quite young and inexperienced, could not ascertain<br />

the real condition of the engine and chassis. He thought those too were damaged, whereas, because of some providential<br />

chance, the chassis and engine remained intact.<br />

The BC was given the responsibility of getting the vehicle back to the unit. He was given a vehicle fitter and recovery vehicle<br />

with a driver. The BC took two more Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) and proceeded to the location to retrieve the<br />

vehicle. It took two days to reach with a few hours of the last leg of the journey in complete darkness in that snow bound area<br />

with treacherous slippery roads. On reaching the location, the Commanding Officer of the local unit, who happened to be the<br />

Station Commander of that sector, expressed his happiness on their taking such a great risk. With the assistance of all ranks<br />

of that unit, who came in willingly, it took two days to get the vehicle out of the boulder strewn area on to a track. It was a<br />

minor military operation in ‘itself’ in that hostile terrain, and inclement weather of high altitude. The troops and officer had a<br />

very good rapport with chose of the local unit and there was not much of a problem in getting the men of that unit to assist.<br />

While coming back, the hazards of night journey were very obvious. There was a thick layer of snow on the road with slope<br />

towards the khuds as layers after layers kept on accumulating, freezing before the water could roll down the compete slope.<br />

There were steep falls on one side. Both these phenomena, peculiar to hilly terrain, were not very discernible because of the<br />

darkness. The headlights of the vehicles exposed very little. There were frozen nalas where the vehicle would skid, aligning<br />

itself in the direction of the frozen nala, which tended to prove quite dangerous at times. At such places, the few troops and<br />

officer available would get down, push the vehicle to keep it aligned to the road and in turn slip down themselves on the<br />

frozen snow, most of the times face-down, in an attempt to push the vehicle. Though the situation was quite grave, it<br />

sometimes bordered on being humorous with everyone laughing spontaneously. At one place, the BC, pushing the vehicle to<br />

keep its tail and aligned to the direction of road, fell down, slipped a few feet down in the frozen nala and landed up head<br />

down in a frozen khud about five feet deep.<br />

But for the direction of landing, the slip and fall could have proved quite dangerous. There was complete silence. The vehicle<br />

was gently stopped on the snow itself, secured with pegs along the wheels and rescue operation commenced for the ditch.<br />

There were several humorous remarks by the BC and the tension was relieved at once, with troops working on the vehicle<br />

with renewed vigour and strength once again. At another place, the recovery vehicle with the damaged vehicle behind it at<br />

suspension toe slipped, but because of the dexterity of the driver, it was saved from going down a nala by putting it on the<br />

left. The BC himself was in the recovery vehicle to give encouragement and moral support to the diver, sharing all the risks<br />

which his troops were facing. He did all that the troops did, while directing, controlling and executing. The party with vehicle<br />

reached the unit location on the evening of the second day starting from the high altitude area. The problem of recovery of the<br />

vehicle being resolved, the question of enquiry into the cause of accident arose. An enquiry into such an accident would have<br />

caused embarrassment to all those in authority in the unit and also the officers and jawans of the sub-unit/battery. Meanwhile,<br />

the inspection of the vehicle was carried out to assess the extent of damage. It was found that the engine and chassis were<br />

intact and the rest of the items of the body or fitment were damaged, either lightly or severely. To avoid embarrassment to the<br />

unit and loss to the exchequer, as well as in view of the administrative difficulties, the BC decided to have the vehicle put on<br />

road with the units’ efforts and at the earliest. Meanwhile, the cabin-hood of the vehicle had been purchased for about Rs.<br />

650 and was paid for by the BC, from his own pocket, thus setting an example to others.<br />

The JCO and jawans were also keen to pay for other damages. The offer was appreciated but declined. The Officer-in-charge<br />

of the local Army Workshop happened to be an officer with commendable helping attitude, positive bent of mind and with an<br />

understanding of peculiarities and problems of the area where such accidents were quite frequent and possible. When<br />

approached to assist, he listened to the whole incident very sympathetically and promised to assist in whatever way he could.<br />

This officer was a contemporary of the unit in a previous station and had excellent relations and interaction with the unit.


Some items were offered by the workshop officer and replaced accordingly. The vehicle was made road-worthy again within<br />

a fortnight and put on road for duty. All the enquiries were dispensed with and there was no loss of face by face by anyone at<br />

any level. It is pertinent to mention that it had snowed in that location as soon as the recovery party came out of the hills.<br />

QUESTION<br />

1. What are the qualities of a good leader? In this case, how were they applied?<br />

2. Which factors contributed to motivate the troops to go ahead for such a difficult task as recovering a damaged<br />

vehicle from such a difficult and treacherous terrain and getting it repaired in such a short time?<br />

3. Which incidents indicate the importance of good interpersonal relationship with juniors, peers and superiors and<br />

what is the importance of good interpersonal relationships?<br />

Case on Motivation<br />

Mr. Alok Banarjee is the Chief Executive of a medium- sized pharmaceutical firm in Calcutta. He holds a Ph D in Pharmacy.<br />

However, he has not been involved in research and development of new products for two decades. Though turnover is not a<br />

problem for the company, Mr. Banarjee and his senior colleagues noticed that the workers on hourly basis are not working<br />

upto their full potential. It is well known fact that they filled their days with unnecessary and unproductive activities and<br />

worked only for the sake of a pay cheque. In the recent past the situation has become quite alarming as the organization<br />

began to crumble under the weight of uneconomical effort. The situation demanded immediate managerial attention and<br />

prompt remedial measures. Mr. Banarjee knew very well that the only way to progress and prosper is to motivate workers to<br />

peak performance through various incentive plans.<br />

One fine morning, Mr. Banarjee contacted the Personnel Manager and enquired: “What is the problem with the workers on<br />

hourly basis? The wage bill shows that we pay them the highest in the industry. Our working conditions are fine. Our fringe<br />

benefits are excellent. Still these workers are not motivated. What do they require really?” The Personnel Manager gave the<br />

following reply: “I have already informed you a number of times, that money, working conditions and benefits are not<br />

enough. Other things are equally important. One of workers in that group recently gave me a clue as to why more and more<br />

workers are joining the bandwagon of ‘non-performers’. He felt bad that hard work and efficiency go un-noticed and unrewarded<br />

in our organization. Our promotion and benefit plans are tied to length of service. Even the lazy workers,<br />

accordingly, enjoy all the benefits in the organization, which, in fact according to workers should go only to those who work<br />

hard.”<br />

Mr. Banarjee then wanted the Personnel Manager to look into the problem more closely and find out a solution to the<br />

problem of workers on hourly basis.<br />

Answer the following questions<br />

1. Explain the motivational problem in this case.<br />

2. What would be your response to Banarjee’s statement, if you were the Personnel Manager of the Company?<br />

3. If you were the manager, how would you motivate the employees so that they work better?


“Middle Management Development”<br />

for<br />

BMTMN<br />

Session Title: Human Resource<br />

Management and Organisational<br />

Behaviour<br />

Session Speaker: Prof. Nagesha HN


Session Contents<br />

1. Overview of HRM and Role and<br />

Responsibilities of a Manager<br />

2. Rudiments of Organisational Behaviour<br />

3. Leadership<br />

4. Motivation<br />

5. Managing Change<br />

6. Performance Management


Overview of HRM and<br />

Role and Responsibilities<br />

of a Manager


Human Resource Management<br />

• HRM is the process of acquiring, training,<br />

appraising, and compensating employees, and<br />

attending to their labour relations, health and<br />

safety, and fairness concerns.<br />

• ‘ People or Personal aspects’<br />

• It is “Nurturing”


HRM Functions<br />

1. Societal Objectives<br />

2. Organisational Objectives<br />

3. Functional Objectives<br />

4. Personal Objectives


HRM Functions<br />

Societal<br />

Objectives<br />

Organisational<br />

Objectives<br />

Legal compliance<br />

Benefits<br />

Union-management relations<br />

Human resource planning<br />

Employee relations<br />

Selection<br />

Training and development<br />

Appraisal<br />

Placement<br />

Assessment


HRM Functions<br />

Functional<br />

Objectives<br />

Personal<br />

Objectives<br />

Appraisal<br />

Placement<br />

Assessment<br />

Training and development<br />

Appraisal<br />

Placement<br />

Compensation<br />

Assessment


Good HR Practices<br />

i. Attract and retain talent<br />

ii. Train people for challenging<br />

jobs<br />

iii. Develop skills and<br />

competencies<br />

iv. Develop loyalty and<br />

commitment<br />

v. Promote team spirit<br />

vi. Increase productivity and<br />

profits<br />

vii. Improve job satisfaction<br />

viii.Enhance standard of living<br />

ix. Generate employment<br />

opportunities<br />

x. HRA in Practice at<br />

Infosys.doc


HR Organisational Chart: Small Company<br />

Manager<br />

Labour Relations and<br />

Human Relations<br />

Human Resources<br />

Administrative<br />

coordinator<br />

Human Resource<br />

Coordinator<br />

Office Generalist


Organisation for HRM: Large Company<br />

Vice President<br />

Human<br />

Resources<br />

Administrative<br />

assistant<br />

Director<br />

Employee<br />

health services<br />

Wage / Salary<br />

administration<br />

Recruitment &<br />

placement<br />

Director-<br />

Training<br />

and education<br />

Employee<br />

relations<br />

services<br />

Director<br />

Benefit<br />

services<br />

Manager-<br />

Labour<br />

relations<br />

Safety<br />

manager<br />

Appraisal and<br />

Performance<br />

management<br />

Personal<br />

records,<br />

/ payroll<br />

processing<br />

/ mgmt search<br />

Orientation /<br />

Training /<br />

Management<br />

development<br />

Employee<br />

Counselling /<br />

Employee<br />

Recognition<br />

programs<br />

Benefit payroll<br />

/<br />

Employee<br />

benefit


Development of HRM<br />

• In 1950’s, people were recruited ‘to do and die’<br />

• In 1960’s, concept of managing people was<br />

introduced<br />

• In 1970’s, realised that productivity depended on<br />

people<br />

• Employees started demanding over and above their<br />

salaries


Development of HRM<br />

• Personnel department – renamed as Human<br />

resources<br />

• Management theories were introduced<br />

• Concepts of participative management, Kaizen,<br />

Total quality management, empowerment, etc,


HRM Model<br />

1. They provide an analytical frame work for studying<br />

HRM<br />

2. They legitimate certain HRM practices (distinctness<br />

of HRM practices)<br />

3. Provide characteristics of HRM<br />

4. That serve as a heuristic (Process of Involving)<br />

device - something to discover and understand the<br />

nature & significance of key HR practices


The Harvard Model<br />

Shareholders Interests:<br />

•Shareholders<br />

•Management<br />

•Employee groups<br />

•Government<br />

•Community<br />

•Unions<br />

Shareholders Factors:<br />

•Workforce characteristics<br />

•Business strategy and<br />

conditions<br />

•Management philosophy<br />

•Labor market<br />

•Task technology<br />

•Laws and societal values<br />

Human Resource<br />

management policy<br />

choices::<br />

•Employee influences<br />

•Human resource flow<br />

•Reward systems<br />

•Work systems<br />

Human Resource<br />

outcomes:<br />

•Commitment<br />

•Competence<br />

•Congruence<br />

•Cost-effectiveness<br />

Long-term<br />

consequences:<br />

•Individual well being<br />

•Organisational<br />

effectiveness<br />

•Societal well being


Human Resources as a Core<br />

Competency


Manager<br />

• The people responsible for supervising the use of an<br />

Organisation’s resources to meet its goals<br />

• Resources include people, skills, knowledge,<br />

machinery, computers and I.T., and financial capital<br />

• Manager aims to create surplus


Organisational Performance<br />

Efficiency: A measure of how well or how<br />

productively resources are used to achieve a goal<br />

Effectiveness: A measure of the appropriateness of the<br />

goals an Organisation is pursuing and the degree to<br />

which they are achieved.


Organisational Performance<br />

Efficiency = Maximum Output<br />

For Minimum Input<br />

Effectiveness = The Ability To Create<br />

And Keep Customers


Efficiency V/s Effectiveness<br />

Inefficient<br />

Ineffective<br />

Die quickly<br />

Effective<br />

Survive<br />

Efficient<br />

Die slowly<br />

Thrive


Types of Managers<br />

• First line Managers: Responsible for day-to-day<br />

operations. Supervise people performing activities<br />

required to make the product or service<br />

• Middle Managers: Are responsible to find the<br />

best way to use departmental resources to achieve<br />

goals


Types of Managers<br />

• Top Managers: Responsible for the performance<br />

of all departments and have cross-departmental<br />

responsibility.<br />

Establish Organisational goals and monitor middle<br />

managers


New HR Manager<br />

• New proficiencies<br />

• The need to “Know Employment Law”<br />

• Ethics and HR<br />

• HR and Technology<br />

• HR Certification


New Proficiencies<br />

HR Proficiencies: Knowledge and skills In<br />

employee selection, training and compensation<br />

• Business Proficiencies:<br />

• Leadership Proficiencies:<br />

• Learning Proficiencies:


Employment Law<br />

• EEO: Equal Employment Opportunities laws<br />

• OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Acts /<br />

administration<br />

• Labour laws


Ethics and HR<br />

• Serious ethical issues<br />

• Workplace safety and Welfare<br />

• Security of privacy rights


HR and Technology<br />

• Self –service<br />

• Improving HR productivity<br />

• Data warehouse<br />

• Employee portal


Responsibilities of Managers<br />

• Global view<br />

• Speedy operation<br />

• Cope with on-line revolution<br />

• Manage demographic changes and increasing<br />

cultural diversity<br />

• Total quality manager<br />

• Challenging role in restructuring and downsizing


Responsibilities of Managers<br />

• Reengineering –thinking beyond TQM<br />

• Flexibility<br />

• Manage comparatively high compensation<br />

contingent on Organisational performance<br />

• Extensive training<br />

• Reduced differences in status<br />

• Sharing of information


Responsibilities<br />

i. Fundamental Management Responsibilities<br />

ii. Administrative Responsibilities<br />

iii. Guiding Performance<br />

iv. Using Resources Effectively<br />

v. Personal Development<br />

vi. Employee Development and Training<br />

vii. Performance Evaluation


Responsibilities .contd.<br />

viii.Communication Skills<br />

ix. Developing Group Expectations<br />

x. Quality Leadership<br />

xi. Equal Employment Opportunity<br />

xii. Customer Service Within the Organisation<br />

xiii.Outside Employment or Business


Rudiments of<br />

Organisational Behaviour


Organisational Behavior<br />

• OB studies three determinants of behavior in<br />

organisations: individuals, groups, and structure.<br />

• OB applies the knowledge gained about<br />

individuals, groups, and the effect of structure on<br />

behavior in order to make organisations work<br />

more effectively.


Organisational Behavior<br />

• OB is concerned with the study of what people do<br />

in an organisation and how that behavior affects<br />

the performance of the organisation.


Organisational Behavior<br />

Study that investigates the impact of<br />

individuals, groups, and structure on<br />

behavior within organisations for the<br />

purpose of applying such knowledge toward<br />

improving an organisation's effectiveness.


Some Generalised Statements<br />

About Work Related Behaviour<br />

1. Happy workers are productive workers.<br />

2. All individuals are most productive when their boss is friendly,<br />

trusting, and approachable.<br />

3. Interviews are effective selection devices for separating job applicants<br />

who would be high-performing employees from those who would be<br />

low performers.<br />

4. Everyone wants a challenging job.<br />

5. You have to scare people a little to get them to do their jobs.<br />

6. Everyone is motivated by money.<br />

7. Most people are much more concerned with the size of their own<br />

salaries than with others.<br />

8. The most effective work groups are devoid of conflict.


Organisational Behavior<br />

• Behavior of individuals in an organisation are<br />

shaped by individual- level-variables such as:<br />

A. Biographical characteristics,<br />

B. Ability,<br />

C. Personality, and<br />

D. Learning


Organisational Behavior<br />

A. Biographical characteristics are age, gender,<br />

marital status, number of dependents, tenure,…<br />

B. Ability refers to individuals capability to perform<br />

various tasks in a job. An individual’s overall<br />

abilities are made of:<br />

a) Intellectual abilities,<br />

b) Physical abilities


Organisational Behavior<br />

C. Personality is the sum total of ways in which an<br />

individual reacts and interacts with others.<br />

• This is most often described in terms of<br />

measurable personality traits that a person<br />

exhibits.<br />

• Personality determinants are: heredity,<br />

environment and situation,


Organisational Behavior<br />

D. Learning is any relatively permanent change in<br />

behavior that occurs as a result of experience.


Organisational Behavior<br />

• Personality traits: Enduring characteristics that<br />

describe an individual behaviour.<br />

• Popular characteristics include shy, aggressive,<br />

submissive, lazy, ambitious, loyal, and timid


Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: MBTI<br />

• One of the most Widely used personality<br />

frameworks is called the Myers-Briggs Type<br />

Indicator (MBTI).<br />

• It is essentially a 100 question personality test that<br />

asks people how they usually feel or act in<br />

particular situations.


Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: MBTI<br />

• Individuals are classified as:-<br />

Extroverted or Introverted (E or I),<br />

Sensing or Intuitive (S or N),<br />

Thinking or Feeling (T or F),<br />

Perceiving or Judging (P or J),<br />

• Individuals are then classified into16 personality<br />

types.


Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: MBTI<br />

• INTJs are visionaries<br />

• They have original minds and great drive for their<br />

own ideas and purposes.<br />

• They are characterized as skeptical, critical,<br />

independent, determined, and often stubborn.


Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: MBTI<br />

• ESTJs are organizers.<br />

• They're practical, realistic, matter-of-fact, with a<br />

natural head for business or mechanics.<br />

• They like to organize and run activities.


Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: MBTI<br />

• The ENTPs type is a conceptualizer.<br />

• He or she is quick, ingenious, and good at many<br />

things.<br />

• This person tends to be resourceful in solving<br />

challenging problems, but may neglect routine<br />

assignments.


Five Factor Model of Personality<br />

1. Extraversion<br />

2. Agreeableness<br />

3. Conscientiousness<br />

4. Emotional stability<br />

5. Openness to experience


Five Factor Model of Personality<br />

1. Extraversion: Sociable talkative and assertive<br />

2. Agreeableness: One who is good-natured,<br />

cooperative and trusting<br />

3. Conscientiousness: Responsible, dependable,<br />

persistent and achievement oriented


Five Factor Model of Personality<br />

4. Emotional stability: Calm, nervous, enthusiastic,<br />

depressed and insecure<br />

5. Openness to experience: Imaginative, artistically<br />

sensitive and intellectual


Personality attributes influencing OB<br />

1. Locus of control: Internals or Externals<br />

2. Machiavellianism: Degree to which an individual<br />

is pragmatic<br />

3. Self-esteem:<br />

4. Self-monitoring:<br />

5. Risk taking:


Organisational Culture<br />

• Organisational culture describes the psychology,<br />

attitudes, experiences, beliefs and values (personal<br />

and cultural values) of an Organisation.<br />

• “The specific collection of values and norms that are<br />

shared by people and groups in an Organisation and<br />

that control the way they interact with each other and<br />

with stakeholders outside the Organisation”


Organisational Culture<br />

“Beliefs and ideas about what kinds of goals<br />

members of an Organisation should pursue<br />

and ideas about the appropriate kinds or<br />

standards of behavior Organisational<br />

members should use to achieve these goals”.


Organisational Culture<br />

• Organisational values develop into Organisational<br />

norms, guidelines or expectations that prescribe<br />

appropriate kinds of behavior by employees in<br />

particular situations and control the behavior of<br />

Organisational members towards one another.


Dimensions of Culture<br />

• Hofstede identified five dimensions of National<br />

Culture:-<br />

1. Power distance index<br />

2. Individualism V/s Collectivism<br />

3. Uncertainty avoidance index<br />

4. Masculinity V/s Femininity<br />

5. Long V/s short term orientation


Dimensions of Culture<br />

Power distance Index:<br />

• Measures the power inequality between superior &<br />

subordinate with in a social system<br />

• High PDI scores: Tend to be hierarchical, members<br />

citing social role, manipulation and inheritance as a<br />

source of power and social status<br />

• Low PDI: Tend value equality, and cite knowledge and<br />

respect as source of power


Dimensions of Culture<br />

Individualism / Collectivism index:<br />

• Focuses on self-orientation. (‘I’ or ‘We’ mentality)<br />

• Cultures that score high in IDV index reflect ‘I’<br />

mentality.<br />

• Personal initiative and independence are endorsed<br />

• Collectivism reflects strong cohesive groups


Dimensions of Culture<br />

Uncertainty avoidance index:<br />

• Measures the tolerance of uncertainty & ambiguity<br />

among members of a society<br />

• High UAI: Highly intolerant of uncertainty and tend to<br />

be distrustful of new ideas or behaviour. Tend to have<br />

high level of anxiety and stress and a concern with<br />

security and the rule following. Always seek: absolute<br />

truth.


Dimensions of Culture<br />

• Low UAI: Associated with a low level of anxiety and<br />

stress, tend to have tolerance for deviation and<br />

dissent and a willingness to take risks. Takes a more<br />

empirical approach to understanding of knowledge.<br />

Masculinity / Femininity Index:<br />

• Focuses on assertiveness and achievement


How is Culture Created?<br />

External adaptation and survival<br />

‣Mission and strategy<br />

‣Goals<br />

‣Means<br />

Internal Integration<br />

‣Measurement<br />

Language concepts<br />

Group and team boundaries<br />

Power and status<br />

Reward and punishment


Mechanistic V/s Organic Culture<br />

Mechanistic Culture:<br />

• ‘We’ versus ‘They’ perception<br />

• Values of bureaucracy and feudalism<br />

• Authority flow: Top to Bottom (Downwards)<br />

• Departmental loyalty and interdepartmental<br />

animosity


Mechanistic V/s Organic Culture<br />

Organic Culture:<br />

• Formal hierarchies of authority and departmental<br />

boundaries<br />

• Task accomplishment, team work and free flow of<br />

communication<br />

• Stresses for flexibility, consultation, change and<br />

innovation


Authoritarian V/s Participative<br />

Culture<br />

Authoritarian Culture:<br />

• Power is concentrated on the leader<br />

• Obedience to orders and discipline are stressed<br />

• Leader is aware of Organisational interest


Authoritarian V/s Participative<br />

Culture<br />

Participative culture:<br />

• Committed to the decisions<br />

• Suitable where Organisational members are<br />

professional


Dominant V/s Sub Cultures<br />

Dominant Culture:<br />

• Refers to the established language, religion,<br />

behavior, values, rituals, and social customs.<br />

• These are often the norm for the society as a<br />

whole.


Dominant V/s Sub Cultures<br />

• The dominant culture is usually but not always is<br />

in the majority<br />

• Achieves its dominance by controlling social<br />

institutions such as communication, educational<br />

institutions, artistic expression, law, political<br />

process, and business<br />

• Consists of several cells of sub cultures


Dominant V/s Sub Cultures<br />

Sub Cultures<br />

• Is a group of people with a Culture (whether<br />

distinct or hidden) which differentiates them<br />

from the larger culture to which they belong.<br />

• Is characterized by a systematic opposition to the<br />

dominant culture


Strong V/s Weak Culture<br />

Strong Culture:<br />

• Core values are strongly, widely shared and eagerly<br />

embraced<br />

• Strong cultures help firms operate like well-oiled<br />

machines, cruising along with outstanding<br />

execution


Strong V/s Weak Culture<br />

Weak Culture:<br />

• There is little alignment with Organisational values<br />

• Control must be exercised through extensive<br />

procedures and bureaucracy


Sources of Organisational Culture<br />

Critical<br />

incidents<br />

Organisational<br />

structure<br />

Identification<br />

with leaders<br />

Organisational<br />

Culture<br />

Organisational<br />

ethics<br />

Property rights<br />

system<br />

Characteristics<br />

of Employees


Critical Incidents<br />

• Norms and beliefs arise around the members<br />

response to critical incidents<br />

• “We do not attract the leader in this group;<br />

Authority is sacred”


Identification with leader<br />

• Founder’s biases and assumptions<br />

• Original members initially employ and learn<br />

subsequently from their own experiences<br />

Ex: JRD Tata typifies this type of Culture creation.


Property Rights<br />

Rights and responsibilities inside stakeholders group<br />

Manager’s Rights<br />

Stock option<br />

Attractive compensation<br />

Control over Organisational resources<br />

Decision making


Property Rights<br />

Employee’s Rights<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

No unjustifiable lay offs<br />

Adequate compensation<br />

Participation in decision making<br />

Pension and benefits<br />

Stock options


Organisational Ethics<br />

Moral values, beliefs and rules<br />

Outlines the right and wrong ways to behave in a<br />

situation<br />

Whistle blowing


Characteristics of people within<br />

the Organisation<br />

• People are attracted to an Organisation whose<br />

values match theirs<br />

• Organisation selects people who share its values<br />

• “People make the place” distinct from that of<br />

similar Organisation


Sustaining Organisational Culture<br />

1. Selecting and socializing employees<br />

2. Actions of founders and leaders<br />

3. Culturally consistent rewards<br />

4. Managing the cultural network<br />

5. Maintaining a stable workforce


Selecting and Socialising Employees<br />

• Hire right people for right jobs<br />

• Individual employee learn values, expected<br />

behaviors, and social knowledge


Selecting and Socialising Employees<br />

• It is a three stage process<br />

1. Pre arrival<br />

2. Encounter<br />

3. Metamorphosis


Actions of Leaders and Founders<br />

Transformational leaders strengthen<br />

Organisational culture<br />

Leaders are expected to behave in consistent with<br />

the vision of the Organisation


Culturally Consistent Rewards<br />

• Aggressive cultures offer performance based<br />

individual incentives and rewards.<br />

• Paternalistic cultures offer employee assistance<br />

programs.<br />

Rewards


Managing Cultural network<br />

Cultural network exists through the Organisational<br />

grapevine<br />

Enacted through story sharing and re-enact rituals<br />

Company magazines and other medias


Maintaining a Stable Workforce<br />

• Workforce behavior during rapid expansion and<br />

weak periods<br />

• Moderating employment growth and checking<br />

turnover problems


Leadership


Leadership<br />

Leadership: The ability to influence a group toward<br />

the achievement of a vision or a set of goals<br />

• Leadership is about coping with change<br />

1. Establish direction by Developing a vision of the future<br />

2. Align people by communicating vision and inspiring<br />

them to overcome hurdles<br />

• Leaders can Emerge from within a group or by formal<br />

appointment to lead a group


Trait Theories<br />

Leaders have been described in<br />

terms of their traits<br />

Trait Theories: Theories that<br />

consider personality, social,<br />

physical, or intellectual traits to<br />

differentiate leaders from nonleaders<br />

Leadership Traits:<br />

• Ambition and energy<br />

• The desire to lead<br />

• Honesty and integrity<br />

• Self-confidence<br />

• Intelligence<br />

• High self-monitoring<br />

• Job-relevant knowledge


Trait Theories<br />

Limitations:<br />

• No universal traits found that predict leadership in all<br />

situations.<br />

• Traits predict behavior better in “weak” than “strong”<br />

situations.<br />

• Unclear evidence of the cause and effect of relationship<br />

of leadership and traits.<br />

• Better predictor of the appearance of leadership than<br />

distinguishing effective and ineffective leaders.


Behavioral Theories<br />

Behavioral Theories of Leadership:<br />

Theories proposing that specific behaviors<br />

differentiate leaders from non-leaders.<br />

• Trait theory:<br />

Leaders are born, not made.<br />

• Behavioral theory:<br />

Leadership traits can be taught.


Ohio State Studies<br />

• Research carried out in the late 1940’s at Ohio state<br />

University<br />

• Sought to identify independent dimensions of<br />

leadership behaviour<br />

• Grouped dimensions into two categories:<br />

1. Initiating structure<br />

2. Considerations


Ohio State Studies<br />

Initiating Structure: The extent to which a<br />

leader is likely to define and structure his or her<br />

role and those of sub-ordinates in the search for<br />

goal attainment.


Ohio State Studies<br />

• It includes attempts to organise works, work relationship,<br />

and goals<br />

• Characteristics of Leader:<br />

i. Assigns group members to particular tasks<br />

ii. Expect workers to maintain definite standards of performance<br />

iii. Emphasizes the meeting of deadlines<br />

• Examples: Larry Ellison (CEO - Oracle )<br />

Tom Siebal (Chairman - Siebal systems)


Ohio State Studies<br />

Consideration: The extent to which a leader is likely to have<br />

job relationships characterized by mutual trust, respect for<br />

subordinate’s ideas, and regard for their feelings.<br />

• The leader:<br />

a) Shows concern follower’s comfort, well being and satisfaction,<br />

b) Helps employees with personal problems, is friendly and<br />

approachable and treats all employees as equals<br />

c) EX: Richard Parsons (AOL Time Warner)


University of Michigan Studies<br />

• Studies came up with two-dimensions of leader ship<br />

behaviour<br />

1. Employee-Oriented Leader: Emphasizing interpersonal<br />

relations; taking a personal interest in the needs of<br />

employees and accepting individual differences among<br />

members.<br />

2. Production-Oriented Leader: One who emphasizes<br />

technical or task aspects of the job.


The Managerial Grid<br />

(Blake and Mouton)


The Managerial Grid<br />

(Blake and Mouton)<br />

• The grid has 9 possible positions along each axis,<br />

creating 81 different positions in which leader may<br />

fall.<br />

• Grid shows dominating factors in a leader’s thinking<br />

in regard to getting results.


The Managerial Grid<br />

(Blake and Mouton)<br />

1, 9- Country Club<br />

Management: Satisfying<br />

relationships, friendly<br />

atmosphere<br />

9,9 - Team Management:<br />

Committed people, highly<br />

motivated group,<br />

excellent relationships<br />

Concern<br />

for<br />

People<br />

5,5- Middle of the road<br />

1,1 - Impoverished<br />

Management: Minimum efforts<br />

to get Jobs done<br />

9,1 - Autocratic: Task oriented,<br />

Authority compliance.<br />

Concern for<br />

Production


Situational Leadership Theory<br />

(Hersey and Blanchard’s )<br />

• A contingency theory that focuses on followers’ readiness.<br />

• Successful leadership is achieved by selecting the right leadership<br />

styles.<br />

Unable and<br />

Unwilling<br />

Unable but<br />

Willing<br />

Able and<br />

Unwilling<br />

Able and<br />

Willing<br />

Follower readiness:<br />

ability and willingness<br />

Leader: decreasing need<br />

for support and supervision<br />

Directive<br />

High Task and Relationship<br />

Orientations<br />

Supportive<br />

Participative<br />

Monitoring


Situational Leadership Theory<br />

(Hersey and Blanchard)<br />

Follower<br />

Readiness<br />

Unwilling<br />

Willing<br />

Able<br />

Supportive<br />

Participative<br />

Monitoring<br />

Leadership<br />

Styles<br />

Unable<br />

Directive<br />

High Task and<br />

Relationship<br />

Orientations


Leader-Member Exchange Theory<br />

• Leaders often act very differently<br />

towards different people<br />

• Leaders tend to have favorites who<br />

made up his/her “in-group”<br />

LMX Theory: The creation by leaders of in-groups and outgroups;<br />

subordinates with in-group status will have higher<br />

performance ratings, less turnover, and greater job satisfaction.


Leader-Member Exchange Theory<br />

• In groups: Because of time pressures, leaders establish<br />

a special relationship with a small group of followers<br />

• They are trusted, get a disproportionate amount of<br />

leader’s attention, and are likely to receive special<br />

privileges<br />

• Others followers fall into out-groups<br />

• Leaders choose in-group members because they have<br />

attitude and personality characteristics similar to them


Leader-Member Exchange Theory


Path-Goal Theory<br />

The theory that it is the leader’s job to assist followers in<br />

attaining their goals and to provide them the necessary<br />

direction and/or support to ensure that their goals are<br />

compatible with the overall objectives of the group or<br />

organization.


The Path-Goal Theory<br />

Environment<br />

Leader<br />

Employee


Leader-Participation Model<br />

(Vroom and Yetton)<br />

Task structures have varying demands<br />

for routine and non-routine activities,<br />

and leader behaviour must adjust to<br />

reflect the task structure<br />

A leadership theory that provides a<br />

set of rules to determine the form and<br />

amount of participative decision<br />

making in different situations.


Inspirational Approaches to<br />

Leadership<br />

Inspirational leadership theories view<br />

leaders who inspire followers through<br />

their words, ideas, and behaviour.<br />

Two Theories:<br />

1. Charismatic Leadership<br />

2. Transformational leadership<br />

Martin Luther King Jr.


Charismatic Leadership<br />

• Charisma: “ a certain quality of an individual<br />

personality, by virtue of which he or she is set apart<br />

from ordinary people and treated as endowed with<br />

supernatural, superhuman, or at least specially<br />

exceptional powers or qualities – Max Weber<br />

• Charismatic leadership is one of several ideal types<br />

of authority


Charismatic Leadership<br />

Followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary<br />

leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors.<br />

1. An individual needs to develop an aura of charisma<br />

by maintaining an optimistic view, using passion<br />

and communicating<br />

2. An individual draws others by creating a bond that<br />

inspires others to follow<br />

3. An individual brings out the potential in followers<br />

by tapping into their emotions


Key Characteristics of<br />

Charismatic Leaders<br />

1. Vision and articulation: Has a vision—expressed as an<br />

idealized goal—that proposes a future better than the status quo; and<br />

is able to clarify the importance of the vision in terms that are<br />

understandable to others.<br />

2. Personal risk: Willing to take on high personal risk, incur high<br />

costs and engage in self-sacrifice to achieve the vision.<br />

3. Environmental sensitivity: Able to make realistic assessments<br />

of the environmental constraints and resources needed to bring about<br />

change.


Key Characteristics of<br />

Charismatic Leaders<br />

4. Sensitivity to follower needs: Perceptive of others’ abilities<br />

and responsive to their needs and feelings.<br />

5. Unconventional behavior: Engages in behaviors that are<br />

perceived as novel and counter to norms.


Beyond Charismatic Leadership<br />

Level 5 Leaders<br />

• Possess a fifth dimension - A paradoxical blend of<br />

‘personal humility and professional will’ in<br />

addition to the four basic leadership qualities.<br />

• (Individual capability, team skills, managerial competence,<br />

and the ability to stimulate others to high performance)<br />

• Channel their ego needs away from themselves and into<br />

the goal of building a great company.


Transactional Leadership<br />

• Leaders who guide or motivate their followers<br />

in the direction of established goals by<br />

clarifying role and task requirements<br />

• Most of the Leadership theories discussed so<br />

far have concerned transactional leaders


Transactional Leadership<br />

Characteristics of Transactional leaders<br />

Contingent Reward<br />

Management by<br />

Exception (active)<br />

Management by<br />

Exception (passive)<br />

Laissez-Faire<br />

Contracts exchange of rewards for effort, promises<br />

rewards for good performance, recognises<br />

accomplishments<br />

Watches and searches for deviations fro rules and<br />

standards, takes corrective action<br />

Intervenes only if standards are not met<br />

Abdicates responsibilities, avoid making decisions


Transformational Leadership<br />

• Leaders who provide individualized consideration<br />

and intellectual stimulation, and who possess<br />

charisma.<br />

• Inspire followers to go beyond their self-interests for<br />

the good of the organisation and capable of having a<br />

profound and extraordinary effect on their followers<br />

• Andrea Jung (Avon), Richard Branson (Virgin<br />

Group)


Transformational Leaders<br />

Characteristics of Transactional leaders<br />

Charisma<br />

Inspiration<br />

Intellectual<br />

Stimulation<br />

Individualized<br />

Consideration<br />

Provides vision and sense of mission, instills pride, gains<br />

respect and trust.<br />

Communicates high expectations, uses symbols to focus<br />

efforts, expresses important purposes in simple ways.<br />

Promotes intelligence, rationality, and careful problem<br />

solving.<br />

Gives personal attention, treats each employee<br />

individually, coaches, advises.


Transformational Leadership<br />

• Leaders are more creative and encourage their<br />

followers to be more creative and to take more risks<br />

• Purse more ambitious goals, be familiar with and<br />

agree on the strategic goals of the organisation<br />

• Believe that the goals they are pursuing are<br />

personally important<br />

• Leaders try to choose followers who have the same<br />

level of passion, commitment, and competitiveness


Authentic Leadership<br />

• To be an authentic person, an individual needs to be<br />

honest with oneself, and avoid self-deception<br />

• Authentic leaders know who they are, know what<br />

they believe in and value, and act on those values and<br />

beliefs openly and unequivocally<br />

• They build trust by sharing information, encourage<br />

open communications, and stick to their ideas


Ethics and Leadership<br />

• Top executives set the moral tone for an organisation,<br />

they need to set high ethical standards,<br />

• Also demonstrate through their behaviour, encourage<br />

and reward integrity in others<br />

• Leadership effectiveness needs to address:<br />

a) The means that a leader uses in trying to achieve goals<br />

b) The contents of those goals


Ethical Leadership<br />

• Work to positively change the<br />

attitudes and behaviors of employees.<br />

• Engage in socially constructive<br />

behaviors.<br />

• Do not abuse power or use improper<br />

means to attain goals.


Trust<br />

• Trust is a positive expectation that<br />

another will not—through words,<br />

actions, or decisions—act<br />

opportunistically<br />

• Trust is a history-dependent process<br />

(familiarity) based on relevant but<br />

limited samples of experience (risk)


Dimensions of Trust<br />

1. Integrity: honesty and<br />

truthfulness.<br />

2. Competence: an individual’s<br />

technical and interpersonal<br />

knowledge and skills.<br />

3. Consistency: an individual’s<br />

reliability, predictability, and<br />

good judgment in handling<br />

situations.<br />

4. Loyalty: the willingness to<br />

protect and save face for another<br />

person.<br />

5. Openness: reliance on the<br />

person to give you the full<br />

truth.


Trust and Leadership<br />

• Trust is a primary attribute associated leadership<br />

• When trust is broken, it can have serious adverse effects<br />

on a group’s performance<br />

• Trust and trust-worthiness modulate the leaders' access to<br />

knowledge and cooperation<br />

• Honesty is absolutely essential to leadership<br />

Leadership<br />

TRUST<br />

and<br />

INTEGRITY


Basic Principles of Trust<br />

• Mistrust drives out trust.<br />

• Trust begets trust.<br />

• Growth often masks mistrust.<br />

• Decline or downsizing tests the highest levels of trust.<br />

• Trust increases cohesion.<br />

• Mistrusting groups self-destruct.<br />

• Mistrust generally reduces productivity.


Employees’ Trust in Their CEOs<br />

Employees who believe in senior management:


Contemporary Leadership Roles<br />

1. Providing Team Leadership<br />

2. Mentoring<br />

3. Self-Leadership<br />

4. Online Leadership


Providing Team Leadership<br />

Team Leadership Roles:<br />

• Team leaders are liaisons with external constituencies such<br />

as upper management, other internal teams, customers, and<br />

suppliers<br />

• Serve as troubleshooters – when team has problems, try to<br />

resolve problems<br />

• Managing conflict.<br />

• Coaching to improve team member performance


Mentoring<br />

• Mentor is a senior<br />

employee who sponsors<br />

and supports a lessexperienced<br />

employee (a<br />

protégé)<br />

• Mentors are good<br />

teachers<br />

Mentoring Activities:<br />

• Present ideas clearly<br />

• Listen well<br />

• Empathize<br />

• Share experiences<br />

• Act as role model<br />

• Share contacts<br />

• Provide political guidance


Mentoring<br />

• Some organisations have formal mentoring<br />

programs where mentors are assigned to new or<br />

high-potential employees<br />

• Most organisations relay on informal mentoringsenior<br />

managers personally selecting an employee<br />

and selecting as protégé<br />

• Boss-subordinate relationship may limit openness<br />

and meaningful communication


Self-Leadership<br />

• Self-Leadership: A<br />

set of processes<br />

through which<br />

individuals control<br />

their own behavior<br />

• Effective leaders<br />

help their followers<br />

to lead themselves<br />

Creating self leaders:<br />

• Model self-leadership.<br />

• Encourage employees to create<br />

self-set goals.<br />

• Encourage the use of self-rewards.<br />

• Create positive thought patterns.<br />

• Create a climate of self-leadership.<br />

• Encourage self-criticism.


Online Leadership<br />

Managers need to ensure correct tone of their message<br />

• The lack of face-to-face contact in electronic<br />

communications removes the nonverbal cues that support<br />

verbal interactions.<br />

• There is no supporting context to assist the receiver with<br />

interpretation of an electronic communication.<br />

• The structure and tone of electronic messages can strongly<br />

affect the response of receivers.


Online Leadership<br />

• An individual’s verbal and written communications may<br />

not follow the same style.<br />

• On-line negotiation may experience lower level of trust<br />

• In this new world of communication, writing skills will<br />

likely to become an extension of interpersonal skills


Finding & Creating Effective Leaders<br />

Selection<br />

• Review specific requirements for the job<br />

• Use tests that identify personal traits associated with<br />

leadership, measure self-monitoring, and assess emotional<br />

intelligence<br />

• Conduct personal interviews to determine candidate’s fit<br />

with the job


Finding & Creating Effective Leaders<br />

Training<br />

• Recognize that all people are not equally trainable<br />

• Teach skills that are necessary for employees to become<br />

effective leaders<br />

• Provide behavioral training to increase the development<br />

potential of nascent charismatic employees


Leadership Style<br />

• Autocratic<br />

• Democratic (Participative)<br />

• Laissez Faire (free rein)<br />

• Paternalistic


Leadership Style<br />

Autocratic<br />

• Leader makes decisions without reference to anyone else<br />

• High degree of dependency on the leader<br />

• Can create de-motivation and alienation<br />

of staff<br />

• May be valuable in some types of business where<br />

decisions need to be made quickly and decisively


Leadership Style<br />

Democratic (Participative)<br />

• Encourages decision making from different perspectives –<br />

leadership may be emphasised throughout the organisation<br />

1. Consultative: process of consultation before decisions are<br />

taken<br />

2. Persuasive: Leader takes decision and seeks to persuade<br />

others that the decision is correct


Leadership Style<br />

Democratic (Participative)<br />

• May help motivation and involvement<br />

• Workers feel ownership of the firm and its ideas<br />

• Improves the sharing of ideas<br />

and experiences within the business<br />

• Can delay decision making


Leadership Style<br />

Laissez-Faire<br />

• ‘Let it be’ – the leadership responsibilities are shared by all<br />

• Can be very useful in businesses where creative ideas are<br />

important<br />

• Can be highly motivational, as people have control over<br />

their working life<br />

• Can make coordination and decision making timeconsuming<br />

and lacking in overall direction<br />

• Relies on good team work<br />

• Relies on good interpersonal relations


Leadership Style<br />

Paternalistic<br />

• Leader acts as a ‘father figure’<br />

• Paternalistic leader makes decision but may consult<br />

• Believes in the need to support staff


Motivation


Motivation<br />

Definition: The processes that account for an<br />

individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort<br />

toward attaining a goal.<br />

Focus is on organisational goal.<br />

Key Elements<br />

1. Intensity: how hard a person tries<br />

2. Direction: toward beneficial goal<br />

3. Persistence: how long a person tries


Motivation<br />

Most important factor of the study of Organizational<br />

behavior that concerns each & every Manager of today.<br />

A Managerial Challenge from time immemorial to achieve<br />

the goals of the Organization.<br />

A psychological factor.<br />

A process of stimulating people to action to accomplish<br />

desired goals.


Characteristics of Motivation<br />

The inner desire of an individual to accomplish something<br />

more.<br />

A continuous Process.<br />

Anticipated perceived value from an action.<br />

Till unsatisfied needs are fulfilled, tension causes<br />

in equilibrium in human behavior.<br />

More motivation levels, the higher will be the efforts.<br />

Individual is motivated by positive motivation, like,<br />

monetary & non-monetary awards.


Characteristics of Motivation<br />

Unsatisfied<br />

needs<br />

Tension<br />

Drives<br />

Ends with<br />

no tension<br />

Satisfied<br />

need<br />

Search<br />

behavior


Importance of Motivation<br />

High Level of Performance.<br />

Low employee turnover & absenteeism.<br />

Acceptance of Organizational Change.<br />

Organizational Image.


Motivational Theories<br />

1. Early Theories of Motivation<br />

a. Hierarchy of needs Theory – (Maslow’s)<br />

b. ERG theory<br />

c. Theory X and Y (McGregor’s)<br />

d. Two Factor Theory (Herzberg)<br />

2. Contemporary Theories<br />

i. McClelands Three – Needs Theory<br />

ii. Cognitive Evaluation Theory<br />

iii. Goal-setting Theory<br />

iv. Self Efficacy Theory<br />

v. Reinforcement Theory<br />

vi. Equity Theory.<br />

vii. Expectancy Theory


Hierarchy of Needs Theory<br />

• This theory provides theoretical foundations for<br />

remuneration and reward strategies.<br />

• It considers the proposition that workers are motivated to<br />

satisfy their personal needs at their place of work<br />

• Abraham Maslow hypothesized that within every human<br />

being there exists a hierarchy of five needs


Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs<br />

1 Physiological<br />

2 Safety<br />

3 Social<br />

4 Esteem<br />

5 Self-Actualization<br />

Includes hunger, thirst, shelter, sex and other<br />

bodily needs<br />

Includes security and protection from physical<br />

and emotional harm<br />

Includes affection, belongingness, acceptance<br />

and friendship<br />

Need for self respect, confidence, autonomy<br />

and achievement, recognition, respect from<br />

others, status<br />

Self-fulfillment, individual growth, and the<br />

realization of potential.


Hierarchy of Needs Theory<br />

Self-actualization<br />

Higher Order<br />

Needs<br />

Esteem<br />

Social<br />

Safety<br />

Physiological<br />

Lower Order<br />

Needs


ERG Theory (Clayton Alderfer)<br />

There are three groups of core needs<br />

1. Existence: provision of basic material requirements<br />

2. Relatedness: desire for relationships<br />

3. Growth: desire for personal development<br />

• Concepts:<br />

• More than one need can be operative at the same time.<br />

• If a higher-level need cannot be fulfilled, the desire to satisfy a<br />

lower-level need increases.


Theory X and Theory Y<br />

(Douglas McGregor)<br />

Douglas McGregor proposed two distinct views of human<br />

beings: Theory X and Theory Y<br />

Theory X<br />

Assumes that employees:<br />

• Dislike work and will<br />

attempt to avoid work<br />

• Lack ambition,<br />

• Avoid responsibility,<br />

• Must be directed and<br />

coerced to perform.<br />

Theory Y<br />

Assumes that employees<br />

• Like work,<br />

• Seek responsibility,<br />

• Are capable of making<br />

decisions,<br />

• Exercise self-direction and<br />

self-control when<br />

committed to a goal.


Two-Factor Theory<br />

(Frederick Herzberg)<br />

Frederick Herzberg conducted a study of need satisfaction<br />

What do people want from their jobs?<br />

What motivates them ?<br />

• Describe situations in which they found their jobs<br />

“exceptionally good” (and therefore motivating).<br />

• Describe situations in which they found their jobs<br />

“exceptionally bad”


Two-Factor Theory<br />

(Frederick Herzberg)<br />

• When they were dissatisfied, they tended to give factors<br />

outside the Job. Known as “Extrinsic Factors” or<br />

“Maintenance factors”<br />

1. Company policy and administration.<br />

2. Technical supervision.<br />

3. Interpersonal relations with<br />

supervisors.<br />

4. Status.<br />

5. Interpersonal relationship with peers.<br />

6. Interpersonal relationship with<br />

subordinates.<br />

7. Salary.<br />

8. Job security.<br />

9. Personal life.<br />

10.Work condition.


Two-Factor Theory<br />

(Frederick Herzberg)<br />

• When they feel good, the factors seemed to be related<br />

to Job Satisfaction. They tended to attribute those<br />

factors to themselves. Known as “Intrinsic Factors”<br />

or Motivational factors”.<br />

1. Achievement.<br />

2. Recognition.<br />

3. Advancement<br />

4. Work itself.<br />

5. Growth.<br />

6. Responsibility.


Two-Factor Theory<br />

(Frederick Herzberg)<br />

Two-Factor (Motivation-Hygiene) Theory<br />

Intrinsic factors are related to job satisfaction, while<br />

extrinsic factors are associated with dissatisfaction.<br />

Hygiene Factors<br />

Factors—such as company policy and administration,<br />

supervision, and salary—that, when adequate in a<br />

job, placate workers. When factors are adequate,<br />

people will not be dissatisfied.


Theory of Needs<br />

(David McClelland’s )<br />

Need for Achievement<br />

The drive to excel, to achieve in<br />

relation to a set of standards, to<br />

strive to succeed.<br />

Need for Affiliation<br />

The desire for friendly<br />

and close interpersonal<br />

relationships.<br />

Need for Power<br />

nPow<br />

The need to make others behave<br />

in a way that they would not<br />

have behaved otherwise.<br />

nAch<br />

nAff


Theory of Needs<br />

(David McClelland’s )<br />

Personal Responsibility<br />

Achievers prefer<br />

jobs that offer<br />

Feedback<br />

Moderate Risks


Theory of Needs<br />

(David McClelland’s )<br />

What do employees want?<br />

i. A learning activity and choice of assignment<br />

ii.<br />

Flexible working hours and time-off<br />

iii. Personal praise<br />

iv. Increased autonomy and authority<br />

v. Time with their manager


Cognitive Evaluation Theory<br />

• Providing an extrinsic reward for behavior that had been<br />

previously only intrinsically rewarding tends to decrease<br />

the overall level of motivation<br />

• Extrinsic Rewards: pay, benefits, promotion,..<br />

• Intrinsic Rewards: achievement, responsibility,<br />

competence, …<br />

• The theory may only be relevant to jobs that are neither<br />

extremely dull nor extremely interesting


Goal-Setting Theory<br />

(Edwin Locke)<br />

The theory that specific and difficult goals, with feedback,<br />

lead to higher performance<br />

“Just do your Best” is vague and not appropriate<br />

Factors influencing the goals–performance<br />

relationship: specific goals, Feed back, Goal<br />

commitment, adequate self-efficacy, task characteristics,<br />

and national culture


Self Efficacy Theory<br />

Self-Efficacy: The individual’s belief that he or she is<br />

capable of performing a task<br />

Higher self-efficacy will lead to higher commitment


Joint Effect of Goals and<br />

Self Efficacy Theory<br />

Individual has confidence that<br />

given performance level can be<br />

achieved (self-efficacy)<br />

Manager sets<br />

difficult, specific<br />

goal for job or task<br />

Individual has higher<br />

level of job or task<br />

performance<br />

Individual sets higher personal<br />

(self-set) goal for their<br />

performance


Concepts:<br />

Reinforcement Theory<br />

• The assumption that behavior is a function of its<br />

consequences that follow one’s behaviour<br />

• This theory argues that reinforcement conditions<br />

behaviour<br />

Behavior is environmentally caused.<br />

Behavior can be modified (reinforced) by providing<br />

(controlling) consequences.<br />

Reinforced behavior tends to be repeated.


Equity Theory<br />

• A theory that individuals compare their job inputs and<br />

outcomes with those of others and then respond to<br />

eliminate any inequalities<br />

• Inputs: effort, experience, education, competence,…<br />

• Outcomes: salary levels, raises, recognition….<br />

• Employees may compare themselves with friends,<br />

neighbors, co-workers, or colleagues in other<br />

organisations or compare present V/s past jobs.


Equity Theory (cont’d)<br />

Choices for dealing with inequity:<br />

1. Change inputs (slack off)<br />

2. Change outcomes (increase output)<br />

3. Distort/change perceptions of self<br />

4. Distort/change perceptions of others<br />

5. Choose a different referent person<br />

6. Leave the field (quit the job)


Equity Theory (cont’d)<br />

Propositions relating to inequitable pay:<br />

1. Overrewarded hourly employees produce more than<br />

equitably rewarded employees.<br />

2. Overrewarded piece-work employees produce less,<br />

but do higher quality piece work.<br />

3. Underrewarded hourly employees produce lower<br />

quality work.<br />

4. Underrewarded employees produce larger quantities<br />

of lower-quality piece work than equitably rewarded<br />

employees


Equity Theory (cont’d)<br />

Distributive Justice:<br />

Perceived fairness of the amount and allocation of rewards<br />

among individuals.<br />

Procedural Justice:<br />

The perceived fairness of the process to determine the<br />

distribution of rewards.


Expectancy Theory<br />

(Victor Vroom)<br />

Expectancy Theory: The strength of a tendency to act in a<br />

certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that<br />

the act will be followed by a given outcome and on the<br />

attractiveness of that outcome to the individual.<br />

Employee will be motivated to exert a high level of effort<br />

when they believe good performance will lead to<br />

organisational rewards<br />

Ex: Salary raise, promotion, bonus, personal goals,…


Expectancy Theory<br />

• Effort–Performance Relationship: The probability that<br />

exerting a given amount of effort will lead to performance.<br />

• Performance–Reward Relationship: The belief that<br />

performing at a particular level will lead to the attainment<br />

of a desired outcome.<br />

• Rewards–Personal Goals Relationship: The degree to<br />

which organizational rewards satisfy an individual’s goals<br />

or needs and the attractiveness of potential rewards for the<br />

individual.


Expectancy Theory<br />

(Victor Vroom)<br />

Individual<br />

Effort<br />

Effort–Performance<br />

Relationship<br />

Individual<br />

performance<br />

Performance-Reward<br />

Relationship<br />

Organisational<br />

rewards<br />

Reward-Personal Goals<br />

Relationship<br />

Personal<br />

Goals


Managing Change


Change<br />

‘Change or Perish’<br />

.<br />

“Moving from their present state to<br />

some desired future state to increase<br />

the effectiveness”


Change<br />

1920-1990<br />

• Efficient manufacturing<br />

• Classical organisation and methods<br />

• Effective mass marketing<br />

• Rapid adoption of technology<br />

• Financial acumen Theory


Change<br />

1990 – The Future<br />

• Distributing power while increasing self-discipline<br />

• Systematic thinking skills<br />

• Well developed skills<br />

• Improved conversation


Types of Change<br />

1. Strategies, positions, policies, programmes, ploys<br />

and patterns<br />

• Performances: competitiveness, added values,<br />

responsiveness, productivities, results and innovations<br />

• Alliances, sustain abilities, and movement<br />

• Structures and groupings<br />

• Processes and work arrangements<br />

• Resource allocations and savings


Types of Change Contd..<br />

2. People – individual and groups<br />

• Behaviours: performances, conformities, creativities<br />

• Competencies: mastery in performance<br />

• Attitudes, Values and Beliefs<br />

3. Distributions of opportunity


Levels of Change<br />

• International<br />

• National<br />

• Industry - Market<br />

• The firm<br />

The collective/the hive<br />

The function/department<br />

The group-team<br />

The individual<br />

• The supply chain<br />

• The network


Why Change is Required?<br />

• To avoid stagnation<br />

• Increase competitive business<br />

• Evolutionary reaction to external circumstances<br />

and pressures<br />

• Radical shift from current to new processes


Change Readiness and Comfort<br />

• Comfort with the current state:<br />

1. Do not underestimate the power of “Comfort”<br />

with how things are today<br />

2. The Natural response to change is pause and<br />

reaction


Change Readiness and Comfort<br />

“Many change agents are surprised by the<br />

reaction to change, when in fact, they<br />

should plan for many reactions.”


Phases of Change<br />

Current<br />

State<br />

Transition<br />

State<br />

Future<br />

State


Current State<br />

Employees generally prefer the current state<br />

Current<br />

State<br />

Transition<br />

State<br />

Future<br />

State


Future State<br />

Future state is unknown to employees<br />

Current<br />

State<br />

Transition<br />

State<br />

Future<br />

State


Why Change Projects Fail?<br />

(Source: John Kotter 1996)<br />

Eight Common reasons:<br />

1. Too much complacency: No sense of urgency early on<br />

2. Failing to create a strong guiding coalition: One person<br />

with energy/commitment is seldom enough. A coalition of<br />

corporate leaders capable of overcoming inertia/opposition.<br />

3. Underestimating the power of vision: To direct, align and<br />

inspire<br />

4. Under communicating the vision by a power of 10 (or<br />

100, or 1,000): People will commit to benefits and<br />

achievable. Communicate sufficient information to reach<br />

these conclusions


Why Change Projects Fail? Contd..<br />

5. Permitting Obstacles to block the new vision: If not<br />

anticipated or removed, reasons to slip back into comfort<br />

zones.<br />

6. Failing to create short term wins: Many transformations<br />

take years. People become dispirited if they do not see some<br />

concrete signs of progress.<br />

7. Declaring Victory too soon: Major changes take time to<br />

'bed down'. Teething problems occur – declaring victor loses<br />

credibility<br />

8. Neglecting to anchor changes firmly in the corporate<br />

culture: Temptation to dust hands and walk away. Old habits<br />

and processes return.


Change Management<br />

• Change management is a structured process and set<br />

of tools for leading the people side of change.<br />

• Individual change is managed through the ADKAR<br />

model.<br />

• Supervisors are the lynchpin to change management<br />

success.


Change Management<br />

• Change management is defined as the process of<br />

achieving the smooth implementation of change by<br />

planning and introducing it systematically, taking<br />

into account the likelihood of it being resisted.


Change Management<br />

• Superior performance – top down to bottom up<br />

• Improve quality – TQ movement<br />

• For customers – to delight, not lose<br />

• For competitive advantage<br />

• Need of the hour<br />

• Critical threats for survival and interdependencies


Change Management<br />

• For energised, committed workforce<br />

– Learn to act in the interests of the whole organisation<br />

– To extend mastery and self-determination across the<br />

organisation<br />

• To help people embrace change<br />

• Freedoms to speak out (release creative capacity)


Change Management<br />

• At an Organisational level<br />

– Using a structured change management approach<br />

– Engaging sponsors in the change process<br />

• At an individual level<br />

– Building change competency of managers and supervisors<br />

– Equipping employees to have the right conversations about<br />

change and how the change impacts them


Change Management Approach<br />

Phase 1: Preparing for Change<br />

• Define your change Management<br />

Strategy<br />

• Prepare your change Management Team<br />

• Develop your sponsorship model<br />

Phase 2: Managing Change<br />

• Develop change management plans<br />

• Take action and implement plans<br />

C<br />

Phase 3: Reinforcing Change<br />

• Collect and analyze feedback<br />

• Diagnose gaps and manage readiness<br />

• Implement actions and celebrate success


ADKAR is useful for individual<br />

Change Management<br />

Awareness<br />

Desire<br />

Knowledge<br />

Ability<br />

Reinforcement


ADKAR<br />

ADKAR is based on basic human truths that are<br />

present even in the absence of change.<br />

• Awareness of surroundings and self.<br />

• The need to have control over our life.<br />

• A quest for growth and knowledge.<br />

• A hope to make a meaningful contribution.<br />

• The need to be recognised and appreciated


ADKAR<br />

• Awareness of the need for change (why?)<br />

• Desire to support and participate in the change (our<br />

choice).<br />

• Knowledge about how to change (the learning<br />

process).<br />

• Ability to implement the change (turning knowledge<br />

into action).<br />

• Reinforcement to sustain the change (celebrating<br />

success).


Mapping ADKAR to Change<br />

Management Tools<br />

Communications<br />

Sponsor Roadmap<br />

Training<br />

These channels are critical for<br />

change management<br />

Readiness Mgmt<br />

Supervisory Coaching


Mapping ADKAR (cont’d)<br />

These channels enable project team to facilitate<br />

Organisation through phases of ADKAR.<br />

Communications<br />

Sponsor Roadmap<br />

Training<br />

Readiness Mgmt<br />

Supervisory Coaching<br />

Awareness<br />

Desire<br />

Knowledge<br />

Ability<br />

Reinforcement


Best Practices to Reinforcing<br />

Change<br />

Preferred Senders: Immediate supervisor<br />

Best Practices:<br />

• Repeat messages 5 to 7 times<br />

• Use face-to-face interaction<br />

• Answer WIIFM (What’s In It For Me?)<br />

• Utilize question and answer format<br />

• Understand their interpretation


Change Management Error<br />

• A common mistake Change Management teams<br />

make is: “Not to train Managers and Supervisors<br />

in the basic principles and tools for managing<br />

change”<br />

• These Managers will be instrumental in overall<br />

success of change management.


Sizing the Change<br />

• Scope the Change: Workgroup, department,<br />

division and Enterprise<br />

• Determine Number of Individuals Impacted:<br />

• Define Change Type: Policy, process, system,<br />

Organisation, job roles, etc<br />

• Determine Amount of Change: Incremental<br />

improvement v/s dramatic change


Management and Organisation<br />

• Role of line management shifts from ‘Autocrat’ to<br />

‘Facilitator’<br />

• Boundaries between jobs, divisions, and departments<br />

become blurred<br />

• Increase in project and group work<br />

• Employees are required to be ‘Customer Centric’


Types of Change<br />

• Evolutionary change: Increase the effectiveness,<br />

incremental change<br />

• Revolutionary change: Dramatic shift, new way of<br />

doing things, new goals, new structure.


Resistance to Change<br />

• Individual resistance to Change<br />

• Organisational Change


Individual Resistance<br />

• Perceptions<br />

• Personality<br />

• Habit<br />

• Threats to power and influence<br />

• Fear of the unknown<br />

• Economic reasons


Organisational Resistance<br />

• Organisation design<br />

• Organisational culture<br />

• Resource limitations<br />

• Fixed investments<br />

• Inter Organisational agreements


Organisational Resistance<br />

SOURCES OF RESISTANCE TO CHANGE<br />

ORGNAISATIONAL<br />

LEVEL<br />

FORCES<br />

GROUP LEVEL<br />

FORCES<br />

INDIVIDUAL<br />

LEVEL<br />

FORCES<br />

SUB UNIT<br />

LEVEL<br />

FORCES


Overcoming Resistance<br />

Resisting force<br />

• Group norms for output<br />

• Familiarity with present<br />

equipment<br />

• Complacency<br />

• Need to learn new skills<br />

• Fear of reduced influence and<br />

rewards<br />

Current level of<br />

group performance<br />

Desired level of group<br />

performance<br />

Driving force<br />

• High performance goals<br />

• New equipment<br />

• Competition<br />

• Employees with new skills<br />

• Desire for increased influence<br />

and rewards


Forces for Change<br />

• External forces<br />

• Internal forces


Internal Forces<br />

• Organisational salience<br />

• Falling effectiveness<br />

• Crisis<br />

• Changing employee expectations<br />

• Change in the work climate


External Forces<br />

• Globalization<br />

• Workforce diversity<br />

• Technological change<br />

• Managing ethical<br />

behavior<br />

• Government politics<br />

• Competition<br />

• Scarcity of resources<br />

• Social trends<br />

• World politics<br />

• Economic shocks


Why do People Resist Change?<br />

• Habits:- We are creatures of habit.<br />

• Fear of the unknown.<br />

• Security:– The higher the need for security, the<br />

stronger the resistance.<br />

• Economic factors.<br />

• Selective information processing – We all have<br />

our own ideas of what is right.


Why Do Organisations Resist<br />

Change?<br />

• Group inertia: Peer pressure, group norms.<br />

• Security:<br />

– Threat to established power relationships.<br />

– Threat to established resource allocations.<br />

• Limited focus of change – Change affects others in the<br />

Organisation.<br />

• Poor communication<br />

• Threat to expertise


Lewin’s 3- Step Change Model<br />

1.<br />

Unfreezing<br />

3<br />

Refreezing<br />

2<br />

Changing


3- Step Change Model (Lewin)<br />

• Unfreezing – altering the present stable equilibrium<br />

that supports existing behaviours and attitudes.<br />

• Changing – developing new responses based on<br />

new information.<br />

• Refreezing – stabilizing the change by introducing<br />

the new responses into the personalities of those<br />

concerned.


Options<br />

Three options to bring about change:<br />

1. Increase the driving forces.<br />

2. Decrease the restraining forces.<br />

3. Do a combination of the two approaches.


Role of Change Agents<br />

Technology<br />

Structure<br />

People<br />

Physical<br />

setting


Role of Change Agents<br />

• Structure – Change agents can alter one or more of<br />

the key elements in an Organisation’s design.<br />

• Technology – Competitive factors or innovations<br />

within an Organisation often require change agents<br />

to introduce new equipment, tools, or methods.


Role of Change Agents<br />

• Physical Settings – Change agents can affect their<br />

environment.<br />

• People – Change agents help individuals and groups<br />

within the Organisation work more effectively<br />

together.


People as Change Drivers<br />

• People who drive change are change agents.<br />

1. Change-agent skills are important to the success of<br />

change management.<br />

2. The purpose of people is to change what is<br />

possible as individuals by adding value every day.


Implementing Change: Guidelines<br />

• Education and Communication<br />

• Participation and Empowerment<br />

• Facilitation<br />

• Bargaining and Negotiation<br />

• Manipulation<br />

• Coercion


Performance<br />

Management


Performance Appraisal<br />

• Performance Appraisal: Evaluating an<br />

employee’s current or past performance relative to<br />

his or her performance standards<br />

• Performance Management: A process that<br />

consolidates goal setting, performance appraisal<br />

and development into a single common system


Performance Appraisal<br />

Key Elements of Performance Appraisal:<br />

• Define the Employee’s Goals and work efforts:<br />

Set Goals (Make the Company successful)<br />

• Communicate<br />

• Measure (Goal accomplishment)<br />

• Assessment (Performance Appraisal)<br />

Set Goals<br />

Evaluate<br />

Communicate<br />

Observe


Process of Performance<br />

Management<br />

• Define performance<br />

• Facilitate performance<br />

• Encourage performance


Purpose of Performance Appraisal<br />

• Clarify expectations and<br />

shape behavior to meet<br />

strategic goals.<br />

• Basis for Personnel<br />

Decisions (e.g., promotion,<br />

pay, discipline, benefits, etc.)


Purpose of Performance Appraisal<br />

• Provide feedback for improvement<br />

• Document Employee behavior for legal compliance


Employment<br />

Decision<br />

Employee<br />

feedback<br />

Diagnosis of<br />

Organisation<br />

problems<br />

Purpose of<br />

Performance<br />

Appraisal<br />

Criteria in<br />

test<br />

Validation<br />

Objective for<br />

training<br />

programs


Performance Management and<br />

Appraisal<br />

Six primary criteria on which the value of<br />

performance may be assessed:<br />

1. Quality<br />

2. Quantity<br />

3. Cost effectiveness<br />

4. Need for Supervision<br />

5. Interpersonal impact<br />

6. Timeliness


Facilitate Performance<br />

• Eliminate roadblocks to performance<br />

• Provide resources<br />

• Get the job done right time and right way<br />

• Careful selection of employee


Encourage Performance<br />

• Sufficient amount of rewards and compensation<br />

• Timely reward<br />

• Fair reward


Requirements of effective<br />

appraisal system<br />

a) Relevance<br />

b) Performance standards<br />

c) Sensitivity<br />

d) Reliability<br />

e) Acceptability<br />

f) Practicality


Methods of Appraising Employee<br />

Performance<br />

• Traditional<br />

• Modern


Traditional<br />

• Ranking method<br />

• Paired comparison<br />

• Grading<br />

• Forced distribution<br />

• Forced choice method<br />

• Checklist method<br />

• Critical incidents<br />

method<br />

• Graphic scale method<br />

• Essay method<br />

• Field review method<br />

• Confidential report


Modern Methods<br />

• Management By Objectives (MBO)<br />

• Behaviorally anchored rating scales<br />

• Assessment centers<br />

• 360 degree appraisal<br />

• Cost Accounting method


Ranking Method<br />

• Employees are ranked from the highest to the<br />

lowest or from the best to the worst<br />

• The next highest and the next lowest are chosen till<br />

all employees are covered


Paired Comparison<br />

• Raters are provided with bunch of slips each<br />

containing a pair of names, the rater puts tick mark<br />

again the employee whom he considers the better of<br />

the two


Grading Method<br />

• Employee performance compared with grade<br />

definitions as outstanding, very good, good,<br />

satisfactory and unsatisfactory


Forced Distribution Method<br />

• Eliminate the central tendency of rating most of the<br />

employees at a higher end of the scale.<br />

• A < 5%<br />

• B about 30%<br />

• C about 40%<br />

• D about 20%<br />

• E < 5%


Forced Choice Method<br />

• Positive and negative statements are used to assess<br />

employees performance<br />

• Positive statement: gives good and clear<br />

instructions<br />

• Negative statement: makes promises beyond his<br />

limit to keep those promises


Check-list method<br />

• Attempt is to determine the degree of consistency of<br />

the rater by asking the same question twice<br />

• Questions carries a weight age in relationship to<br />

their importance


Critical Incidents Methods<br />

• Focusing is on the critical behaviors that make the<br />

difference between performing a job in a effective<br />

and ineffective manner


Graphic Rating Scale Method<br />

• Based on the five point scale – linear rating scale<br />

• It contains quality and reliability


Essay Method<br />

• Rater writes a narrative description on an employee’s<br />

strengths, weaknesses, past performance, potential and<br />

suggestions for improvement


Field Review Method<br />

• Identify areas of inter rater disagreement<br />

• Help the group arrive at a consensus<br />

• Ensure that each rater conceives of the standard<br />

similarity


Management By Objective (MOB)<br />

• Goal setting<br />

• Performance standards<br />

• Goal attained are compared with standards<br />

• Periodic review step is taken


Assessment Centers<br />

• Evaluation of executive and supervisory potential<br />

• Managers participate in a simulated exercise


360 Degree Appraisal<br />

• Employee’s skills, abilities and behaviors, is<br />

collected “all around” an employee in a correct and<br />

realistic way


360 Degree Feedback<br />

Supervisors<br />

Peers<br />

Outsiders<br />

Subordinates


Cost Accounting Method<br />

• Evaluates employee’s performance from the<br />

monetary benefits the employee yields to his/her<br />

Organisation


Performance Evaluator<br />

• Immediate supervisor<br />

• Peers<br />

• Subordinates<br />

• Self-appraisal<br />

• Customers served<br />

• Computers


Appraisal Error<br />

1. Negative approach: Catching them doing<br />

something wrong!<br />

2. Conducting an “annual” review (as opposed to<br />

the ongoing review)<br />

3. Poor interviewer (poor environment, poor use of<br />

time,…)


Appraisal Error<br />

4. Lacking truth<br />

5. Inadequately defined and/or misunderstood<br />

standards/goals<br />

6. Recency effect: Over emphasis on recent<br />

performance


Appraisal Error<br />

7. Biases<br />

• Similar to me<br />

• Positive leniency: Want to give everyone high<br />

scores<br />

• Negative leniency: Want to give everyone low<br />

scores<br />

• Halo effect: the employee is a "saint" so must have<br />

high scores


Appraisal Error<br />

7. Biases (contd.)<br />

• Attribution: Tending to see poor performance more<br />

within control of the individual and superior<br />

performance as more of an influence of external factors<br />

• Stereotyping:<br />

• Contrast effect: Contrasting one employee's<br />

accomplishments against another


Appraisal error<br />

8. Improper preparation and Poor documentation<br />

9. Lack of follow-up<br />

10. “Gut” feeling (subjectiveness)


Secrets of Effective Performance<br />

Supervisory activities before, during and after<br />

performance:<br />

1. Before<br />

2. During<br />

3. After


Before<br />

• Communicate frequently with subordinates about<br />

their performance<br />

• Provide Training in performance appraisal<br />

• Use problem solving approach<br />

• Prepare performance feedback interviews


During<br />

• Encourage subordinates to participate<br />

• Judge performance, not personality and mannerisms<br />

• Be specific<br />

• Be an active listener<br />

• Mutually agreeable goals for future improvements<br />

• Avoid destructive criticism


After<br />

• Communicate frequently with subordinates about<br />

performance<br />

• Periodically assess progress towards goals.<br />

• Make Organisational rewards contingent on<br />

performance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!