03.11.2014 Views

TP 13579 PROCEEDINGS of the 2nd International Meeting ... - UQAC

TP 13579 PROCEEDINGS of the 2nd International Meeting ... - UQAC

TP 13579 PROCEEDINGS of the 2nd International Meeting ... - UQAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMAPCR ’99<br />

144. To perform a linear regression, a virtual reference device made up <strong>of</strong> combinations <strong>of</strong><br />

devices was constructed (IRFI Reference Selection 1998).<br />

145. Mr. Wambold concluded that:<br />

• a reference device for <strong>the</strong> IRFI is needed;<br />

• STBA device is <strong>of</strong>fered as an interim reference device;<br />

• devices must be calibrated periodically against <strong>the</strong> reference;<br />

• calibration against <strong>the</strong> reference device should be carried out annually.<br />

146. When asked whe<strong>the</strong>r each device will have its own “a” and “b” in <strong>the</strong> statistical model IRFI<br />

= a + b DEV (even if <strong>the</strong> devices are <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same make), Mr. Wambold confirmed that each<br />

device will have its own unique set <strong>of</strong> parameters, a and b.<br />

147. Comments were <strong>of</strong>fered from <strong>the</strong> floor that tires, tire pressures, and load make <strong>the</strong><br />

difference and not <strong>the</strong> measuring devices, and that <strong>the</strong> test surface conditions should be<br />

invariable. Mr. Wambold added that all tests were done with standard tire pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

100 psi.<br />

Physical Methodology for IRFI<br />

148. Arild Andresen, Mobility Friction Technology, Norway, and Chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ASTM<br />

Subcommittee, proposed a standardized test methodology for calculating <strong>the</strong> IRFI for<br />

operational use.<br />

149. The physical methodology for <strong>the</strong> IRFI comprises a number <strong>of</strong> fixed surface classes, master<br />

models for each friction measuring device, pavement friction differentiated by segment, and<br />

computer programs.<br />

150. The advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed methodology is that it is based on a universal concept and<br />

has potential for higher precision and reproducibility.<br />

151. Identification <strong>of</strong> friction characteristics by surface classes <strong>of</strong>fers more flexibility and<br />

comprehensiveness in making rules, and <strong>the</strong> methodology can be adapted to differences in<br />

wheel-braking performances <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> aircraft.<br />

152. A comment was <strong>of</strong>fered from <strong>the</strong> floor that <strong>the</strong> methodology was interesting, but that slush<br />

and dust on ice are missing.<br />

153. Ano<strong>the</strong>r comment was that drag and friction are different entities; consequently, a dual<br />

wheel system may be used for measuring friction and drag separately. Mr. Andresen replied<br />

that no such device exists.<br />

154. When asked whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> IRFI will be qualified by surface conditions (e.g., wet pavement),<br />

Mr. Andresen replied that calculations will be made, but that only one number will be<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!