Consultation Response - Media 12 - Cardiff University PDF 2 MB
Consultation Response - Media 12 - Cardiff University PDF 2 MB
Consultation Response - Media 12 - Cardiff University PDF 2 MB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Total<br />
Programmes<br />
2007<br />
Total<br />
Programmes<br />
2009<br />
Devolution<br />
Programme<br />
Related to<br />
Devolved<br />
Irrelevant Focus Powers<br />
2007 2009 2007 2009 2007 2009<br />
File on<br />
Four<br />
29 30 24 26 0 0 5 4<br />
Analysis 26 21 21 17 4 1 1 3<br />
Panorama 50 53 47 42 0 2 3 9<br />
Total 105 104 92 85 4 3 9 16<br />
Total<br />
Airtime<br />
(mins) 3440 3420 3000 2780 <strong>12</strong>0 90 320 550<br />
For the programmes relevant to (but not about) devolved issues, we applied a<br />
further subdivision (Table 6.2 below). This is a slight departure from our 2007<br />
study, since in 2009 we aimed to make these subdivisions as close as possible<br />
to the categories in our main content analysis. We analysed all 16<br />
programmes and allocated them into two categories in accordance with the<br />
focus of the content analysis outlined in Sections 2 and 3. These were:<br />
• Those programmes that referred to the existence of devolved powers<br />
in a given policy area, either with a passing mention or through a<br />
substantive comparison (‘Relevant Powers Compared’ in Table 6.2).<br />
• Those programmes in which no reference was made to devolved<br />
powers despite covering a policy area in which they exist, thus<br />
implying that the focus of the programme applied uniformly across the<br />
UK, and programmes which, although related to a devolved issue, were<br />
based in England and/or dealt with English cases, but were not<br />
described as such (‘Relevant Powers Not Compared’ in Table 6.2).<br />
Table 6.2: Current affairs programmes relevant to devolution<br />
Total<br />
Relevant Powers<br />
Compared<br />
Relevant Powers Not<br />
Compared<br />
File on 4 4 1 3<br />
Analysis 3 1 2<br />
Panorama 9 4 5<br />
Total 16 6 10<br />
Table 6.2 shows that, in addition to the three programmes explicitly devoted<br />
to devolved issues, there were six programmes that acknowledged the<br />
presence of devolved powers in a given policy area and ten that could have<br />
done so but did not. This gives us three types of programme: those focused<br />
on devolution related issues; those that referenced devolved powers, where<br />
devolution was relevant but not the main focus; and those where devolution<br />
was relevant but not referenced. We explore all three types of programme<br />
below.<br />
50