04.11.2014 Views

Consultation Response - Media 12 - Cardiff University PDF 2 MB

Consultation Response - Media 12 - Cardiff University PDF 2 MB

Consultation Response - Media 12 - Cardiff University PDF 2 MB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Total<br />

Programmes<br />

2007<br />

Total<br />

Programmes<br />

2009<br />

Devolution<br />

Programme<br />

Related to<br />

Devolved<br />

Irrelevant Focus Powers<br />

2007 2009 2007 2009 2007 2009<br />

File on<br />

Four<br />

29 30 24 26 0 0 5 4<br />

Analysis 26 21 21 17 4 1 1 3<br />

Panorama 50 53 47 42 0 2 3 9<br />

Total 105 104 92 85 4 3 9 16<br />

Total<br />

Airtime<br />

(mins) 3440 3420 3000 2780 <strong>12</strong>0 90 320 550<br />

For the programmes relevant to (but not about) devolved issues, we applied a<br />

further subdivision (Table 6.2 below). This is a slight departure from our 2007<br />

study, since in 2009 we aimed to make these subdivisions as close as possible<br />

to the categories in our main content analysis. We analysed all 16<br />

programmes and allocated them into two categories in accordance with the<br />

focus of the content analysis outlined in Sections 2 and 3. These were:<br />

• Those programmes that referred to the existence of devolved powers<br />

in a given policy area, either with a passing mention or through a<br />

substantive comparison (‘Relevant Powers Compared’ in Table 6.2).<br />

• Those programmes in which no reference was made to devolved<br />

powers despite covering a policy area in which they exist, thus<br />

implying that the focus of the programme applied uniformly across the<br />

UK, and programmes which, although related to a devolved issue, were<br />

based in England and/or dealt with English cases, but were not<br />

described as such (‘Relevant Powers Not Compared’ in Table 6.2).<br />

Table 6.2: Current affairs programmes relevant to devolution<br />

Total<br />

Relevant Powers<br />

Compared<br />

Relevant Powers Not<br />

Compared<br />

File on 4 4 1 3<br />

Analysis 3 1 2<br />

Panorama 9 4 5<br />

Total 16 6 10<br />

Table 6.2 shows that, in addition to the three programmes explicitly devoted<br />

to devolved issues, there were six programmes that acknowledged the<br />

presence of devolved powers in a given policy area and ten that could have<br />

done so but did not. This gives us three types of programme: those focused<br />

on devolution related issues; those that referenced devolved powers, where<br />

devolution was relevant but not the main focus; and those where devolution<br />

was relevant but not referenced. We explore all three types of programme<br />

below.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!