Brief of respondent for Florida v. Powell, 08-1175 - Oyez

More documents

Recommendations

Info

iii TABLE OF CONTENTS – Continued Page B. The Decision Below Is Consistent With Decisions of the Federal Courts of Appeals, Which Uniformly Have Found “Before Interrogation” Warnings Misleading ................................................... 27 1. The Federal Courts of Appeals Uniformly Have Rejected Warnings Like Those Here ............................... 28 2. Petitioner and the Solicitor General Ignore the Relevant Decisions ......... 34 C. The Decision Below Properly Assessed the Substance of the Warnings Given Powell and Did Not Require “Magic Words” .................................................... 38 D. The Decision Below Is Consistent With Law Enforcement Practice Across the Country .................................................. 41 E. Petitioner and the Solicitor General’s Defense of the Warnings Here Is Without Merit ........................................ 44 F. Affirming the Decision Below Will Not Burden Law Enforcement ..................... 50 CONCLUSION ....................................................... 54
iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Almeida v. State, 737 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 1999) ............. 18 Bernie v. State, 524 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 1988) ................ 22 Bridgers v. Dretke, 431 F.3d 853 (5th Cir. 2005) .... 34, 35 Bridgers v. Texas, 532 U.S. 1034 (2001).... 32, 33, 35, 37 California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981) (per curiam) ........................................... 26, 28, 31, 33 Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (1991) ........ 15, 20 Commonwealth v. Labron, 690 A.2d 228 (Pa. 1997) ........................................................................ 23 Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994) ........... 26, 48 Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000) ....... 25 Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195 (1989)................. 26 Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981).................. 26 Evans v. Arizona, 514 U.S. 1 (1995)..................... 19, 22 Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979) ................ 1, 26 Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989) ......................... 21 Franklin v. State, 876 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1081 (2005)....................................................................... 52 Graham v. State, 974 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 2007) .......................................................... 41 Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990) ................. 21 Iowa v. Tovar, 541 U.S. 77 (2004) .............................. 26
Page 1 and 2: No. 08-1175 =======================
Page 3: ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTIONS
Page 7 and 8: vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - Continued
Page 9 and 10: viii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - Continu
Page 11 and 12: 1 INTRODUCTION This case presents a
Page 13 and 14: 3 protections. The Florida Supreme
Page 15 and 16: 5 The warning form did not state th
Page 17 and 18: 7 The jury found Powell guilty of p
Page 19 and 20: 9 The Florida Supreme Court conclud
Page 21 and 22: 11 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT I. This Cour
Page 23 and 24: 13 In line with this longstanding j
Page 25 and 26: 15 ARGUMENT I. THE WRIT OF CERTIORA
Page 27 and 28: 17 addressed these separate standar
Page 29 and 30: 19 the Florida Constitution more br
Page 31 and 32: 21 here warrant dismissal. What can
Page 33 and 34: 23 Supreme Court in this case expli
Page 35 and 36: 25 The basis for requiring law enfo
Page 37 and 38: 27 include the right to have counse
Page 39 and 40: 29 Frankson, 83 F.3d 79, 82 (4th Ci
Page 41 and 42: 31 is in the ambiguity of the warni
Page 43 and 44: 33 respecting the denial of the pet
Page 45 and 46: 35 the Fifth Circuit concluded that
Page 47 and 48: 37 For its part, the Solicitor Gene
Page 49 and 50: 39 [T]o advise a suspect that he ha
Page 51 and 52: 41 Fletcher and Mr. Lee signed ‘W
Page 53 and 54: 43 Of the over 900 forms in the stu
Page 55 and 56:
45 the right to counsel “before
Page 57 and 58:
47 Last, Petitioner ultimately retr
Page 59 and 60:
49 Beyond that, Petitioner’s spec
Page 61 and 62:
51 for the United States at *37-38,
Page 63 and 64:
53 decision that Tampa again aligne
show all

Brief of respondent for Florida v. Powell, 08-1175 - Oyez

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?