Brief of respondent for Florida v. Powell, 08-1175 - Oyez
Brief of respondent for Florida v. Powell, 08-1175 - Oyez
Brief of respondent for Florida v. Powell, 08-1175 - Oyez
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
54<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
For the <strong>for</strong>egoing reasons, the Court should<br />
dismiss the writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari as improvidently<br />
granted or affirm the judgment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Florida</strong><br />
Supreme Court.<br />
Respectfully submitted,<br />
MARA V.J. SENN<br />
ANTHONY J. FRANZE<br />
R. STANTON JONES<br />
BENJAMIN H. WALLFISCH<br />
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP<br />
555 12th Street N.W.<br />
Washington, DC 20004<br />
(202) 942-5000<br />
CRAIG A. STEWART<br />
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP<br />
399 Park Avenue<br />
New York, NY 10022<br />
(212) 715-1000<br />
JAMES MARION MOORMAN<br />
Public Defender<br />
Tenth Judicial Circuit<br />
CYNTHIA J. DODGE*<br />
Assistant Public Defender<br />
DEBORAH KUCER BRUECKHEIMER<br />
Assistant Public Defender<br />
P.O. Box 9000-Drawer PD<br />
Bartow, FL 33831<br />
(863) 534-4200<br />
Counsel <strong>for</strong> Respondent<br />
*Counsel <strong>of</strong> Record<br />
October 2009
Change language