08.11.2014 Views

BRUCE HEAVY WATER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

BRUCE HEAVY WATER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

BRUCE HEAVY WATER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Four broad criteria relating to safety, environmental protection, cost and schedule were<br />

considered in the analysis. The preferred option that was selected from this process<br />

involves the demolition to grade of all structures, buildings and site services, followed by<br />

site remediation.<br />

7.0 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION<br />

Section 5.0 of the EASR describes the public and stakeholder consultation program<br />

conducted by OPG during the environmental assessment. A number of consultative<br />

activities involving local communities, aboriginal peoples, government departments and<br />

other stakeholders were conducted. Communication activities included project<br />

notification letters, public information open houses, newsletters, tours of the site, and<br />

project briefings to stakeholder committees. The consultation occurred in three periods:<br />

(i) an initial period from September 1998 to December 1998; (ii) an interim period from<br />

January 1999 to June 2002 that primarily involved governmental consultation; and (iii) a<br />

third period from July 2002 to September 2002 which involved distribution of a<br />

preliminary draft of the EASR to interested stakeholders in the local community for<br />

comment.<br />

Issues raised by stakeholders during the consultation, and the consideration of these<br />

issues in the assessment, are identified in section 5.0 of the EASR. No public concerns<br />

associated with the decommissioning project were identified which would warrant a need<br />

to have the project referred to a mediator or review panel pursuant to section 25 of the<br />

CEAA.<br />

8.0 <strong>PROJECT</strong> DESCRIPTION<br />

Section 3.0 of the EASR describes the proposed decommissioning project that was<br />

assessed.<br />

The current status of the site is described, including an identification of the structures and<br />

buildings associated with the BHWP (eg., enrichment and degassing towers, pipe racks);<br />

site services (eg., surface water treatment facility, process effluent lagoons, sludge<br />

lagoons); and substances (nuclear, chemical) remaining on site.<br />

The proposed decommissioning project works and activities are described in Section 3.0<br />

of the EASR, including:<br />

(i) demolition methods;<br />

(ii) decommissioning of structures;<br />

(iii) decommissioning of buildings;<br />

(iv) decommissioning of site services;<br />

(v) land remediation; and<br />

(vi) management of wastes generated during the project.<br />

- 6 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!