- Page 1 and 2: Modification of Dynamic Modulus Pre
- Page 3 and 4: CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEN
- Page 5 and 6: Table 36: Project Effect Calibratio
- Page 7: Figure 38: G* Master Curve for Asph
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND
- Page 13 and 14: well-known procedures among them. T
- Page 15 and 16: and Hirsch Models (Chapter 4), and
- Page 17 and 18: Table 1. The percentages in Table 1
- Page 19 and 20: The binder grading results showed b
- Page 21 and 22: maximum stress, and maximum strain
- Page 23 and 24: Gyratory Compactor (SGC) is used to
- Page 25 and 26: Figure 3: Master Curve Construction
- Page 27 and 28: The penetration viscosities were us
- Page 29 and 30: V 1S V 2S Va ’ Vc Vv V m V 1P V 2
- Page 31 and 32: Previous Evaluation of the Witczak
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 6: Master Curve Comparison f
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 9: Summary of Percent Error
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 12: Measured Values vs. Pred
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 15: Comparison of Values Usi
- Page 41 and 42: Effects of Fibers on Asphalt Concre
- Page 43 and 44: Project Mix Number Table 5: Experim
- Page 45 and 46: 500' 500' 500' 500' 500' 500' 500'
- Page 47 and 48: Iowa DOT Demonstration Project The
- Page 49 and 50: Percent Passing, % Table 7: Iowa De
- Page 51 and 52: Percent Passing, % 100.0 90.0 80.0
- Page 53 and 54: Percent Passing, % Table 9: Indiana
- Page 55 and 56: Figure 28: Universal Testing Machin
- Page 57 and 58: shear stress to achieve a preset st
- Page 59 and 60:
ORIGINAL MODEL EVALUATION A total n
- Page 61 and 62:
Witczak 2006 Model Predicted Dynami
- Page 63 and 64:
Hirsch Model Predicted Dynamic Modu
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 13: ANOVA Table for Hirsch Mo
- Page 67 and 68:
MN vs. MO Yes 0% vs. 4% Yes MN vs.
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 16: Volumetric Properties of
- Page 71 and 72:
| | where η = viscosity (Poise), |
- Page 73 and 74:
G*, Pa G*, Pa temperatures. As show
- Page 75 and 76:
Phase Angle 75 65 55 45 35 25 15 37
- Page 77 and 78:
(| | ) ( ( )) where | | = dynamic s
- Page 79 and 80:
calibration variable D IN, D IA , D
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 21: Regression Results of 0%-
- Page 83 and 84:
Modified Witczak Model Predicted Dy
- Page 85 and 86:
Modified Witczak Model Predicted Dy
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 22: Regression Results of RAS
- Page 89 and 90:
decreasing with increasing RAS cont
- Page 91 and 92:
CP1 IN , CP1 IA , CP1 MN , CP1 MO =
- Page 93 and 94:
Equation 34. where P 1 c = modified
- Page 95 and 96:
MODIFIED MODEL EVALUATION The afore
- Page 97 and 98:
Dynamic modulus E*, psi Dynamic mod
- Page 99 and 100:
Dynamic modulus E*, psi Dynamic mod
- Page 101 and 102:
Model Predicted E*, psi Model Predi
- Page 103 and 104:
Model Predicted E*, psi Model Predi
- Page 105 and 106:
Model Predicted E*, psi Model Predi
- Page 107 and 108:
are larger than the variability of
- Page 109 and 110:
Dynamic modulus E*, psi Dynamic mod
- Page 111 and 112:
Dynamic modulus E*, psi 10000000 10
- Page 113 and 114:
Model Predicted E*, psi Model Predi
- Page 115 and 116:
5%, and 6% RAS contents. The δ cal
- Page 117 and 118:
0.1 0.05 3% RAS 5% RAS 6% RAS 0 -0.
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 29: Coefficient Correlation C
- Page 121 and 122:
1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 6% RAS -2
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 31: 2006 Witczak Modification
- Page 125 and 126:
10000 8000 6000 4000 3% RAS 4% RAS
- Page 127 and 128:
dummy variables. A statistical anal
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 32: Project Effect Calibratio
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 36: Project Effect Calibratio
- Page 133 and 134:
REFERENCES [1] New Hampshire Depart
- Page 135 and 136:
[26] D. W. Christen and D. A. Ander
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 39: Dynamic Modulus Test Resu
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 41: Dynamic Modulus Test Resu
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 43: Dynamic Modulus Test Resu
- Page 143 and 144:
Table 45: Dynamic Modulus Test Resu
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 47: Dynamic Modulus Test Resu
- Page 147 and 148:
Table 49: Dynamic Modulus Test Resu
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDIX B: DSR TEST RESULTS Table
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDIX C: DSR FREQUENCY SWEEP TES
- Page 153 and 154:
Mix Temp. Freq. BC-21 BC-23 BC-24 B
- Page 155 and 156:
Mix Temp. Freq. BC-27 BC-28 BC-29 B
- Page 157:
29 1.585 2773000 52.32 4360000 47.8