Nanomedicine - European Science Foundation
Nanomedicine - European Science Foundation
Nanomedicine - European Science Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
28<br />
3. EUROPEAN SITUATION AND FORWARD LOOK – SWOT ANALYSIS<br />
Threats<br />
Funding and<br />
Strategic Issues<br />
Academic Research<br />
and Education<br />
Environment<br />
for Research<br />
and Development<br />
Commercial<br />
Exploitation<br />
Technology<br />
• EU and/or national<br />
bureaucracy limiting<br />
the best use of<br />
funding for research<br />
and innovation<br />
• Failure to respond<br />
quickly to the need for<br />
more multidisciplinary<br />
training targeted at<br />
<strong>Nanomedicine</strong>, leading<br />
to Inadequately trained<br />
workforce<br />
• Continued erosion of<br />
the <strong>European</strong><br />
pharmaceutical<br />
industry<br />
• Difficulties in<br />
managing intellectual<br />
property with many<br />
different national patent<br />
organisations. Poorly<br />
capitalised companies<br />
can lose their<br />
intellectual property<br />
base<br />
• Lack of scientific<br />
dissemination and<br />
truly interdisciplinary<br />
exchange in the field<br />
of <strong>Nanomedicine</strong><br />
• Continued<br />
fragmentation<br />
of efforts in the<br />
<strong>Nanomedicine</strong> field,<br />
particularly economic,<br />
political, and<br />
regulatory aspects<br />
• Increasing lack<br />
of science<br />
(under)graduates<br />
• Too many young<br />
researchers leaving<br />
Europe, particularly to<br />
USA via brain-drain<br />
• Pharmaceutical<br />
companies<br />
concentrating their<br />
research outside<br />
Europe<br />
• Inability to secure<br />
sufficient funding (and<br />
time) to commercialise<br />
innovative products<br />
• Mismatch between<br />
studies on toxicology<br />
of nanomaterials<br />
and <strong>Nanomedicine</strong><br />
researchers in certain<br />
sub-disciplines<br />
• Discrepancies<br />
between promises<br />
and facts in funding<br />
• Negative public and<br />
political perception.<br />
A different perception<br />
by the public on risks<br />
of the use of<br />
nanopharmaceuticals<br />
was noted, compared<br />
to the uses of<br />
nanotechnology in<br />
hi-tech products;<br />
e.g. computers and<br />
mobile telephones<br />
• Researchers<br />
becoming unwilling<br />
to take on high risk<br />
projects because of the<br />
need to generate data<br />
(success) for subsequent<br />
project evaluation<br />
• Overregulation<br />
and inadequate<br />
funding for small<br />
companies<br />
• Failure to consider<br />
the environmental<br />
impact of new materials<br />
• Failure to consider<br />
the safety of new<br />
materials in respect of<br />
proposed applications<br />
• Lack of a balanced<br />
understanding of<br />
the risk-benefit of<br />
<strong>Nanomedicine</strong>-related<br />
products in their many<br />
forms and applications