Planting the future: opportunities and challenges for using ... - EASAC

Recommendations

Info

Smyth S and McHughen A (2008). Regulating crop innovative technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6, 213–225 Smyth SJ and Gray R (2011). Intellectual property sharing agreements in gene technology: Implications for research and commercialization. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management 4, 179–190 Snell C, Bernheim A, Berge JB, et al. (2012). Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review. Food and Chemical Toxicology 50, 1134–1148 Sparrow P, Broer I, Hood, EE, Eversole K, Hartung F and Schiemann J (2013). Risk assessment and regulation of molecular farming. Current Pharmaceutical Design. In the press Stein AJ and Rodriguez-Cerezo E (2009). The global pipeline of new GM crops: implications of asynchronous approval for international trade. Report from JRC. http:// ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2420 Stein AJ and Rodriguez-Cerezo E (2010). International trade and the global pipeline of new GM crops. Nature Biotechnology 28, 23–25 STOA (2010). STOA-PRRI seminar on the impact of EO GMO regulations on research in biotechnology for the public good. European Parliament, Science and Technology Options Assessment, Conference Report. http://www.stoa.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/webdav/ site/cms/shared/2_events/workshops/2010/20100225/ summary_report_en.pdf Stone GD (2007). Agricultural deskilling and the spread of genetically modified cotton in Warangal. Current Anthropology 48, 67–103 Stone GD (2011). Field versus farm in Warangal: Bt cotton, higher yields, and larger questions. World Development 39, 387–398 Subramanian A and Qaim M (2009). Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: the case of Bt cotton in India. World Development 37, 256–267 Sujii ER, Togni PHB, Ribeiro PA, et al. (2013). Field evaluation of Bt cotton crop impact on nontarget pests: cotton aphid and boll weevil. Neotropical Entomology 42, 102–111 Sun C, Sathish P, Ahlandsberg S and Jansson C (1998). The two genes encoding starch-branching enzymes IIa and IIb are differentially expressed in barley. Plant Physiology 118, 37–49 Swiss Academies (2013). Gentechnisch veranderte Nutzpflanzen – und ihre Bedeutung fur eine nachhaltige Landwirtschaft in der Schweiz. Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. http://www.akademien-schweiz.ch/index/ Publikationen/Berichte.html Swiss National Science Foundation (2012). Benefits and risks of the deliberate release of genetically modified plants. National Research Programme NRP 59. http:// www.nfp59.ch/e_index.cfm Tait J and Barker G (2011). Global food security and the governance of modern biotechnologies. EMBO Reports 12, 763–768 Tardieu F and Hammer G (2012). Designing crops for new challenges. European Journal of Agronomy 42, 1–2 Teulé F, Cooper AR, Furin WA, et al. (2009). A protocol for the production of recombinant spider silk-like proteins for artificial fiber spinning. Nature Protocols 4, 341–355 The White House (2012). National bioeconomy blueprint. Washington, DC. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/ default/files/microsites/ostp/national_bioeconomy_ blueprint_april_2012.pdf Thomas K and Yarrow S (2012). Regulating the environmental release of plants with novel traits in Canada. In Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: the United States and Canada (eds Wozniak CA and Hughen A), pp 147–162. Tinoco MLP, Dias BBA, Dall’Astta RC, Pamphile JA and Aragão FJL (2010). In vivo trans-specific gene silencing in fungal cells by in planta expression of a double-stranded RNA. BMC Biology 8, 27 Trigo E (2011). Fifteen years of genetically modified crops in Argentine agriculture. http://www.argenbio.org/adc/ uploads/15_years_Executive_summary_of_GM_crops_ in_Argentina.pdf UNESCO (2010) UNESCO science report 2010. http:// www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/ pdf/sc_usr10_la_EN.pdf United States Department of Agriculture (2012). Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-ofgenetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us.aspx UPOV (2005). UPOV report on the impact of plant variety protection. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. http://www.upov.int/about/en/ pdf/353_upov_report.pdf Van Montagu M (2011). It is a long way to GM agriculture. Annual Reviews Plant Biology 62, 1–23 Veeman TS and Gray R (2010). The shifting patterns of agricultural production and productivity in Canada. In The Shifting Patterns Of Agricultural Production And Productivity Worldwide (eds Alston JM, Babcock BA and Pardey PG). Ames, IA: The Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center, Iowa State University. 68 | June 2013 | Planting the future EASAC
Venegas-Calerón M, Sayanova O and Napier JA (2010). An alternative to fish oils: metabolic engineering of oil-seed crops to produce omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Progress in Lipid Res. 49, 108–119 Verdier V, Vera Cruz C and Leach JE (2011). Controlling rice bacterial blight in Africa: needs and prospects. Journal of Biotechnology. doi:10.1016/j. jbiotec2011.09.020 Vianna GR, Cunha NB, Murad AM and Rech E (2011). Soybeans as bioreactors for biopharmaceuticals and industrial proteins. Genetics and Molecular Research 10, 1733–1752 Vicien C (2012). Socioeconomic assessment: a requirement for authorisation for cultivation of GM crops in Argentina. In Lusser M, Raney T, Tillie P, Dillen K and Rodríguez-Cerezo E (eds), International workshop on socio-economic impacts of genetically modified crops co-organised by JRC–IPTS and FAO – Workshop proceedings. http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/ pub.cfm?id=5019 Von Caemmerer S, Quick WP and Furbank RT (2012). The development of C4 rice: current progress and future challenges. Science 336, 1671–1672 von Witzke H and Noleppa S (2010). EU agricultural production and trade: can more efficiency prevent increasing “land-grabbing” outside Europe? Research Report, University of Piacenca. http://www.agrar. hu-berlin.de/fakultaet/departments/daoe/ihe/Veroeff/ opera-final_report_100505.pdf Waltz E (2012). Tiptoeing around transgenics. Nature Biotechnology 30, 215–217 Weglenski P and Twardowski T (2012). New technologies as an opportunity for the Polish economy: GMOs for industry and agriculture. BioTechnologia 93, 7–8 Wilson SA and Roberts SC (2012). Recent advances toward development and commercialization of plant cell culture processes for the synthesis of biomolecules. Plant Biotechnology Journal 10, 249–268 Witt H, Patel R and Schnurr M (2006). Can the poor help GM crops? Technology, representation and cotton in the Makhathini Flats, South Africa. Review of Africa Political Economy 109, 497–513 Wu K-M, Lu Y-H, Feng H-Q, Jiang Y-Y and Zhao J-Z (2008). Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt toxin-containing cotton. Science 321, 1676–1678 EASAC Planting the future | June 2013 | 69
Page 1 and 2:
ea sac Planting the future: opportu
Page 3 and 4:
ea sac Planting the future: opportu
Page 5 and 6:
Contents page Forewordv Summary1 1
Page 7 and 8:
Foreword The world continues to fac
Page 9 and 10:
Summary Agriculture faces major cha
Page 11 and 12:
1 Introduction 1.1 Global societal
Page 13 and 14:
of pesticides will result in a smal
Page 15 and 16:
Box 3 Techniques that breeders use
Page 17 and 18:
2 International comparison of polic
Page 19 and 20:
approval patterns for GM crops in e
Page 21 and 22:
It has been suggested that correcti
Page 23 and 24:
H. armigera, it is nearly 30 times
Page 25 and 26: or GM technology 23 . This approach
Page 27 and 28: 3 The connections between the EU an
Page 29 and 30: EU institutions) and other bodies (
Page 31 and 32: 3.3.2 What was the previous EU impa
Page 33 and 34: 4 Connecting the evidence base and
Page 35 and 36: Fagerstrom et al., 2012; Giddings e
Page 37 and 38: iotechnology in academia in Europe
Page 39 and 40: the World Trade Organization Agreem
Page 41 and 42: persist then the current complicati
Page 43: landscape. Among these policy disco
Page 46 and 47: to whether surveillance and regulat
Page 49: Appendix 1 Working Group The report
Page 53 and 54: Appendix 3 Background information o
Page 55 and 56: production systems, but production
Page 57 and 58: total value of food exports (2010-1
Page 59: Appendix 4 Methodological difficult
Page 62 and 63: Other field trials are underway in
Page 65: List of abbreviations ATPS Bt CAP C
Page 68 and 69: for Global Conference on Agricultur
Page 70 and 71: EASAC (2011). Plant genetic resourc
Page 72 and 73: Gruère GP and Sun Y (2012). Measur
Page 74 and 75: Morrell PL, Buckler ES and Ross-Iba
Page 78: EASAC, the European Academies Scien
show all

Planting the future: opportunities and challenges for using ... - EASAC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?