11.11.2014 Views

National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health

National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health

National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Spasticity in children <strong>and</strong> young people with non-progressive brain disorders<br />

Oral baclofen versus placebo or no treatment<br />

All three studies identified <strong>for</strong> inclusion (McKinlay 1980; Milla 1977; Scheinberg 2006) reported<br />

reduction of spasticity.<br />

Table 6.4 Evidence profile <strong>for</strong> oral baclofen compared with placebo in children with spasticity of different<br />

severities; tone assessment<br />

Number of<br />

studies<br />

Number of participants Effect Quality<br />

Baclofen Placebo Relative<br />

Absolute<br />

(95% CI)<br />

(95% CI)<br />

Improvement of spasticity (by 1 level of Ashworth scale) at day 28 of treatment<br />

1 study (Milla<br />

1977)<br />

9/20 a 2/20 b RR 4.50 (1.11 to<br />

18.27)*<br />

35 more per 100<br />

(from 1 more to<br />

173 more)*<br />

Low<br />

Improvement of spasticity (by more than 1 level of Ashworth scale) at day 28 of treatment<br />

1 study (Milla<br />

1977)<br />

5/20 c 0/20 c RR 11 (0.65 to<br />

186.62)*<br />

- Low<br />

Reduced muscle tone (Ashworth scale) reported by investigators<br />

1 study<br />

(McKinlay<br />

1980)<br />

- - - d - Low<br />

Reduced muscle tone or better movement reported by physiotherapist<br />

1 study<br />

(McKinlay<br />

1980)<br />

14/20 e 5/20 e RR 2.8 (1.26 to<br />

6.22)*<br />

45 more per 100<br />

(from 6 more to<br />

130 more)*<br />

Moderate<br />

Mean Tardieu scale score at week 12 of treatment (better indicated by lower values)<br />

1 study<br />

(Scheinberg<br />

2006)<br />

15 f 15 g - 4.4 lower h Moderate<br />

CI confidence interval, P probability, RR relative risk<br />

* Calculated by the NCC-WCH<br />

a Reported Sign test P < 0.001<br />

b Reported Sign test P = 0.25. The two patients who improved received placebo be<strong>for</strong>e baclofen<br />

c Significance level was not reported. Using data from the first period only <strong>and</strong> analysing as a parallel trial, (3/10 in baclofen<br />

group versus 0/10 placebo group improved) relative risk (RR) = 7.00 (0.41 to 120.16) P = 0.18<br />

d Data not presented. Statement in report: “No significant changes between baclofen <strong>and</strong> placebo were observed in muscle<br />

tone”. The assessment period <strong>for</strong> this observation was not reported<br />

e Reduced muscle tone or better movement was reported by physiotherapists in 14 children taking baclofen (70%), five<br />

children taking placebo (25%), P = 0.064 reported, method used not reported. One child showed no change throughout. N=20<br />

f Baseline Mean Tardieu score 20.9 (15.7 to 26.2). Final score 25.6 (19.4–25.8)<br />

g Baseline Mean Tardieu score 20.9 (15.7 to 26.2). Final score 27.1 (21.0–33.3)<br />

h No significant treatment, carry over or period effects found. Reported in paper as mean change = -4.4 (-10.8 to 2.0)<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!