read the report - Amnesty International
read the report - Amnesty International
read the report - Amnesty International
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NIGERIA<br />
‘WAITING FOR THE HANGMAN’<br />
7<br />
TIME TO END THE DEATH PENALTY IN LAW AND PRACTICE<br />
“The call for an official moratorium on all executions is borne out of <strong>the</strong> conviction that <strong>the</strong><br />
Federal Government can no longer ignore <strong>the</strong> systemic problems that long have existed in<br />
<strong>the</strong> criminal justice system.”<br />
National Study Group on Death Penalty, 2004<br />
In Nigeria, two expert groups set up by former President Obasanjo – <strong>the</strong> National Study<br />
Group on Death Penalty and <strong>the</strong> Presidential Commission on Reform of <strong>the</strong> Administration<br />
of Justice – both recommended a moratorium on executions. In November 2003, President<br />
Obasanjo initiated a parliamentary discussion on <strong>the</strong> issue of <strong>the</strong> death penalty and<br />
inaugurated <strong>the</strong> National Study Group on Death Penalty. The National Study Group stated in<br />
2004 that “a system that would take a life must first give justice” and in 2007, <strong>the</strong> Chair<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Presidential Commission reiterated this conclusion saying “<strong>the</strong> call for an official<br />
moratorium on all executions is borne out of <strong>the</strong> conviction that <strong>the</strong> Federal Government and<br />
indeed State Governments can no longer ignore <strong>the</strong> systemic problems that have long existed<br />
in our criminal justice system. These problems have been exacerbated by limited funding of<br />
criminal justice agencies, inadequate training of personnel and inadequate legal aid scheme.”<br />
Both commissions highlighted <strong>the</strong> fact that inmates on death row were “almost exclusively<br />
poor and without legal representation.” 3<br />
A momentum is ga<strong>the</strong>ring to end capital punishment around <strong>the</strong> world: in 1977, just 16<br />
countries had abolished <strong>the</strong> death penalty for all crimes. Today, that figure stands at 91.<br />
Eleven o<strong>the</strong>r countries have abolished <strong>the</strong> death penalty for ordinary crimes and retain<br />
<strong>the</strong> death penalty only for exceptional crimes such as those committed in wartime. A fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
35 countries can be considered abolitionist in practice, as <strong>the</strong>y have not carried out an<br />
execution for at least 10 years or have made an international commitment not to use <strong>the</strong><br />
death penalty. This brings <strong>the</strong> total number of countries that have abolished <strong>the</strong> death penalty<br />
in law or practice to 137 out of 192 UN member states. Over <strong>the</strong> past decade more than<br />
three countries a year on average have abolished <strong>the</strong> death penalty in law or – having<br />
abolished it for ordinary crimes – have taken <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r step to abolish it for all crimes.<br />
Moreover, once abolished, <strong>the</strong> death penalty is seldom reintroduced. This trend can be seen<br />
in all regions in <strong>the</strong> world.<br />
Africa is largely free of executions, with only seven of <strong>the</strong> Africa Union’s 53 member states<br />
known to have carried out executions in 2007. According to <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong>’s<br />
information, 13 countries in Africa 4 are abolitionist in law and a fur<strong>the</strong>r 22 are abolitionist<br />
in practice. 5<br />
<strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> and LEDAP oppose <strong>the</strong> death penalty in all cases, regardless of <strong>the</strong><br />
nature of <strong>the</strong> crime, <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> offender, or <strong>the</strong> method used by <strong>the</strong> state to kill<br />
<strong>the</strong> prisoner. The state’s attempts to address social problems and criminality by using <strong>the</strong> death<br />
penalty inevitably lead to inconsistencies and errors, inescapable flaws which are exacerbated<br />
Index: AFR 44/020/2008 <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> October 2008