11.11.2014 Views

read the report - Amnesty International

read the report - Amnesty International

read the report - Amnesty International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NIGERIA<br />

‘WAITING FOR THE HANGMAN’<br />

3<br />

1/INTRODUCTION<br />

‘Death penalty is wrong. It is an instrument<br />

of vengeance, not justice... I think it belongs<br />

to <strong>the</strong> past.’<br />

Owens Wiwa, bro<strong>the</strong>r of executed Ogoni activist Ken Saro-Wiwa, speaking in July 2008<br />

The 720-plus men and 11 women “waiting for <strong>the</strong> hangman” in Nigeria’s prisons have one<br />

thing in common, beyond not knowing when <strong>the</strong>y will be put to death. They are poor. From<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir first contact with <strong>the</strong> police, through <strong>the</strong> trial process, to seeking pardon, those with <strong>the</strong><br />

fewest resources are at a serious disadvantage in Nigeria’s criminal justice system. And some<br />

will pay with <strong>the</strong>ir life.<br />

Some death row prisoners were arrested when <strong>the</strong>y went to a police station because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

knew a suspect or had witnessed a crime. Many said <strong>the</strong> police rounded <strong>the</strong>m up and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

demanded money for <strong>the</strong>ir release. Sometimes police asked for money for fuel, without which<br />

<strong>the</strong>y could not go and see witnesses or check alibis. Overstretched and under-resourced,<br />

<strong>the</strong> police rely heavily on confessions ra<strong>the</strong>r than investigations. And in many cases <strong>the</strong>y use<br />

torture to force suspects to sign <strong>the</strong>se statements.<br />

More than half of all <strong>the</strong> death row prisoners in Nigeria were sentenced to death on <strong>the</strong> basis<br />

of a confessional statement. 1 Some tried to challenge <strong>the</strong> statement in court, but <strong>the</strong> trial judge<br />

refused to believe <strong>the</strong>m when <strong>the</strong>y said <strong>the</strong>y had been tortured and insisted that <strong>the</strong> statement<br />

should stand. Some death row prisoners had no lawyer at all – o<strong>the</strong>rs said that <strong>the</strong>ir lawyer<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r did not argue <strong>the</strong>ir case, or was silenced by <strong>the</strong> trial judge. Often, lawyers were not<br />

allowed to see documents vital to <strong>the</strong> case until <strong>the</strong> trial started. About 80 death row prisoners<br />

were convicted by Robbery and Firearms Tribunals with no right of appeal to a higher court.<br />

These trials fell far short of international standards of fair trial.<br />

Index: AFR 44/020/2008 <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> October 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!