Climate Change - Cohen Commission
Climate Change - Cohen Commission
Climate Change - Cohen Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX 3<br />
Reviewers‟ comments with authors‟ responses<br />
Report Title: <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong><br />
Reviewer Name: Dr. Steven J. Cooke<br />
Date: January 3, 2011<br />
The authors‟ responses to reviewer comments are provided in bold text after each<br />
paragraph where a response is needed. References for publications cited on the responses<br />
are provided unless they are already listed on section 5 (Literature cited) of the revised<br />
report.<br />
1. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of this report.<br />
Note – The report is divided into two separate sections so for the purpose of this review<br />
I provide separate comments for each section and where appropriate discuss their<br />
integration. As a preamble, I like the clarity and organization (including bulleted<br />
executive summary) for both reports.<br />
The real strength is the integration of material and concepts from diverse disciplines.<br />
For example, the authors combine information from physiological ecology, behaviour,<br />
and evolutionary biology (and more) to provide an overview of the mechanisms<br />
associated with the patterns (e.g., in timing and mortality) that are observed.<br />
I also appreciate the integration of new/forthcoming material. Although such material<br />
has not yet been subject to full peer review, in some cases it can help to illuminate<br />
biological phenomena, particularly given that some of these topics represent frontiers in<br />
biology and thus there is a rapidly evolving literature.<br />
The report is fairly easy to read with ample subheadings. It is also a very clean<br />
manuscript (few typos). Both sections could be submitted to peer reviewed journals<br />
with little additional effort. The authors have grounded their work around Fraser<br />
sockeye but have also pulled upon global literature as needed. I am unaware of a<br />
similar synthesis for any Pacific salmon species or system elsewhere.<br />
Report 1. This report is titled “Adult mortality during river migration and on spawning<br />
grounds” with stated objectives to “review the major environmental factors responsible<br />
for adult sockeye salmon mortality during Fraser River migrations and for premature<br />
mortality on spawning grounds, review the early migration – high mortality Late-run<br />
sockeye phenomenon, describe interannual and within-year among stock patterns in<br />
adult mortality, provide a mechanistic understanding for several of these patterns, and<br />
identify scientific knowledge gaps that need to be filled in order to facilitate the<br />
improvement of sockeye management”. Clearly the scope for this report is wide which<br />
101