13.11.2014 Views

Thirty_Years_of_Buddhist_studies,Conze

Thirty_Years_of_Buddhist_studies,Conze

Thirty_Years_of_Buddhist_studies,Conze

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 <strong>Thirty</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Buddhist</strong> Studies<br />

Hu-shih is an historian who wants to know exactly what<br />

happened, how, and in what sequence. For Suzuki, on the other<br />

hand, "Zen is above space-time relations and naturally above<br />

historical facts 11 . Arthur Waley tried to mediate between the<br />

two with a parody <strong>of</strong> Han Shan:<br />

11 Water and ice do one another no harm;<br />

History and religion—both alike are good".<br />

There is no time here to give the reasons why excessive<br />

attention to the facts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Buddhist</strong> history must do harm to the<br />

spiritual vision <strong>of</strong> the dharma. I must be content to distinguish<br />

between three kinds <strong>of</strong> historian—the scientific, the humanistic<br />

and the transcendental. The first <strong>studies</strong> a butterfly after killing<br />

it and fixing it with a pin into a glass case, where it lies quite still<br />

and can leisurely be inspected from all angles. The second lets it<br />

fly in the sun, and looks wonderingly at its pretty ways. The<br />

third assures us that a man will know a butterfly only if he<br />

becomes one. As a creative thinker Suzuki tells the descriptive<br />

historian, whether scientific or humanistic, that Zen must be<br />

grasped within, and not as an outside historical fact, and that<br />

only by actually becoming Zen can one know it. Although his<br />

demands may be rather hard on the average historian, I see no<br />

reason to disagree with him.<br />

Apart from Suzuki's overtowering eminence, his effect on<br />

some Western intellectuals has provoked unfavourable<br />

reactions. Unsuspectingly Suzuki fed an Eastern form <strong>of</strong><br />

spirituality into a predominantly ex-Protestant environment<br />

which, having lost all touch with spiritual tradition, gravitated<br />

inevitably towards a self-assertive nihilism. Stirred by his<br />

message, a vast literature on "Zen" arose in England, France,<br />

Italy, Germany, and the U.S.A., ranging from positively stuffy<br />

and ultra-respectable "square" Zennists to the wild whoopees<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mr. Kerouac and his Beatniks. 1 All that there is in these<br />

books about Zen comes from Suzuki, and he is held responsible<br />

for the misunderstandings they contain. 2 If Suzuki is to be<br />

1 In this connection Allan Watt's pamphlet on Beat Zen, Square Zen<br />

and Zen (1959) is <strong>of</strong> some interest.<br />

2 So Chen-chi Chang, "The nature <strong>of</strong> Ch'an (Zen) Buddhism 9 ', Philosophy<br />

East and West VI 4, 1958. Though it makes some telling points<br />

against some <strong>of</strong> the vulgarizers, this article makes the essential soundness<br />

<strong>of</strong> Suzuki's own work quite apparent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!