Thirty_Years_of_Buddhist_studies,Conze
Thirty_Years_of_Buddhist_studies,Conze
Thirty_Years_of_Buddhist_studies,Conze
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30 <strong>Thirty</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Buddhist</strong> Studies<br />
our knowledge <strong>of</strong> other sects, thereby hoping to gain a fuller<br />
view and a more correct perspective:<br />
1. H. Dumoulin ^ a Jesuit <strong>of</strong> the Catholic Sophia University<br />
at Tokyo, has placed Ch'an into the context <strong>of</strong> Chinese history<br />
and thought. So intent had Suzuki been on explaining the<br />
spiritual message <strong>of</strong> the Ch'an masters, that it is very hard<br />
from his books alone to form an idea <strong>of</strong> their localization in<br />
time and space, or <strong>of</strong> their doctrinal affiliations. In an admirable<br />
article, later on admirably edited by Ruth Fuller Sasaki, 1<br />
Dumoulin describes the development <strong>of</strong> Ch'an during the Tang<br />
and Sung periods, i.e. during the time when Ch'an was at the<br />
acme <strong>of</strong> its creativity, produced a great number <strong>of</strong> strong<br />
personalities, and achieved a startling originality <strong>of</strong> expression.<br />
In 1959 Dumoulin published in German a general survey <strong>of</strong><br />
Zen history 2 which was in 1963 translated into English. This<br />
handbook is a most conscientious and relatively unbiassed<br />
piece <strong>of</strong> work which gives all the relevant facts as known at<br />
present. One may complain that it is confined to the external<br />
historical facts, but they are surely worth knowing, as long<br />
as they are not taken too seriously. Nothing prevents his readers<br />
from suffusing the facts with their own religious experience, if<br />
they have any.<br />
2. Rinzai Zen has become so closely bound up with the<br />
" Japanese national character", or rather the mentality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Samurpi, that it is unlikely to be the same as Ch'an, a creation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essentially pacific Chinese genius. Zen, in fact, is not<br />
Ch'an, but a response <strong>of</strong> the Japanese mind to Ch'an, just as<br />
Ch'an itself had been the response <strong>of</strong> the Chinese mind to Indian<br />
Buddhism. The study <strong>of</strong> Ch'an thought has in recent years been<br />
advanced by Fung Yu-lan 3 to whom we owe a masterly exposition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the philosophical views <strong>of</strong> the Ch'an masters, and partly<br />
by a pimber <strong>of</strong> translations, which range from the T'ang<br />
masters 4 to the later Ch'an literature <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth to<br />
1 The development <strong>of</strong> Chinese Zen, 1953 (First in German in 1941).<br />
2 Zen Geschichte und Gestalt. 1959.<br />
3 A history <strong>of</strong> Chinese philosophy, vol. II, 1953.<br />
4 SheH-hui (668—760) into English in Asia Major, III, 1952, 132-55,<br />
and into French by J. Gernet in various places. Hui Hai (ca. 800) by<br />
J. Bl<strong>of</strong>eld, 1948,1959. The Mumonkan into German by G. H. Dumoulin,<br />
Monumenta Serica, VIII, 1943, pp. 41-102.