14.11.2014 Views

Safety of Anaesthesia in Australia - Australian and New Zealand ...

Safety of Anaesthesia in Australia - Australian and New Zealand ...

Safety of Anaesthesia in Australia - Australian and New Zealand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs for Nsw, Vic <strong>and</strong> Wa cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Gender<br />

In contrast to previous reports, there were more females than<br />

males. The significance <strong>of</strong> this observation is not known.<br />

Figure 1: Gender distribution <strong>in</strong> anaesthesia-related deaths<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

63 50<br />

45<br />

49<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

29<br />

25<br />

24<br />

24<br />

20<br />

16<br />

15<br />

9 10<br />

10<br />

5<br />

NSW VIC WA Total<br />

0<br />

Age<br />

Table 7: Age distribution <strong>in</strong> anaesthesia-related deaths<br />

Age (Years) NSW VIC WA Total<br />

90 8 0 3 11<br />

No anaesthesia-related deaths were recorded <strong>in</strong> children under<br />

one year <strong>of</strong> age. The majority <strong>of</strong> the deaths occurred <strong>in</strong> patients<br />

over the age <strong>of</strong> 60 years (75%). Over two-thirds occurred <strong>in</strong><br />

patients over 70 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> risk<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> risk was stratified us<strong>in</strong>g the American Society<br />

<strong>of</strong> Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification<br />

(see Appendix 2).<br />

Figure 2: Level <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> patients by ASA Physical Status<br />

About 45% <strong>of</strong> anaesthesia-related deaths occurred <strong>in</strong> patients<br />

with the highest levels <strong>of</strong> risk (ASA P 4-5). However, there were<br />

18 low risk patients (ASA P 1-2). This was a further reduction<br />

compared to the previous triennium (16% vs 19%). Nevertheless,<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> anaesthesia-related deaths <strong>in</strong> low risk patients<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> concern.<br />

Degree <strong>of</strong> urgency<br />

Figure 3: Degree <strong>of</strong> urgency <strong>of</strong> the procedure<br />

(with anaesthesia-related deaths)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

ASA P 1 & 2 ASA P 3 ASA P 4 & 5 Not stated<br />

2<br />

17<br />

29<br />

5<br />

13 16 11<br />

3 6<br />

0 0<br />

NSW VIC WA Total<br />

Urgent or Emergency<br />

28<br />

25<br />

Elective<br />

16<br />

24<br />

12<br />

10<br />

NSW VIC WA Total<br />

7<br />

56 56<br />

18<br />

39<br />

50<br />

5<br />

While the total number <strong>of</strong> scheduled procedures far outnumbers<br />

urgent or emergency procedures, 50% <strong>of</strong> the anaesthesia-related<br />

deaths occurred <strong>in</strong> patients undergo<strong>in</strong>g urgent or emergency<br />

procedures. The <strong>in</strong>creased risk associated with urgent or<br />

emergency procedures may relate to the unstable condition<br />

<strong>of</strong> these patients, the <strong>in</strong>adequate opportunity for complete<br />

pre-operative assessment, or a requirement for cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

resuscitation at the same time <strong>of</strong> the adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

<strong>of</strong> anaesthesia.<br />

8 A review <strong>of</strong> anaesthesia-related mortality report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> 2003-2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!