15.11.2014 Views

1 - ericssonhistory.com

1 - ericssonhistory.com

1 - ericssonhistory.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L M Ericsson's H. F. Line Equipment for<br />

Small-Diameter Coaxial Cable<br />

S. TRONSLI, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, STOCKHOLM<br />

UDC 621.395.455/457<br />

LME 8424<br />

This article presents briefly the economic arguments in favour of the smalldiameter<br />

coaxial cable systems and describes LM Ericsson's repeater equipments<br />

with 1.3 and 4 Mc/s bandwidth for this type of cable. These equipments,<br />

and the methods for tlieir connection to the cable, have been developed in<br />

consultation with the Swedish Board of Tele<strong>com</strong>munications.<br />

Through the advent of the silicon-planar technique within the transistor<br />

field, the h. f. line designer of today has amplifying elements at his disposal<br />

which have opened up entirely new possibilities. The very high reliability and<br />

insignificant aging of the silicon-planar transistors, <strong>com</strong>bined with low current<br />

consumption, permit burial of intermediate repeater stations and considerably<br />

simplified remote power feeding. This has resulted in a lower cost of the<br />

intermediate repeaters <strong>com</strong>pared with vacuum tube repeater equipment which,<br />

for maintenance reasons, should preferably be placed indoors.<br />

To attain the minimum price per channel-kilometre, an optimal balance is<br />

required between cable cost and repeater cost. This lower cost of amplification<br />

may therefore warrant a change of the cable dimension.<br />

Economic Considerations<br />

An increase of the coaxial tube diameter results in a higher cable price and<br />

lower repeater cost per kilometre, and vice versa. Simple calculations show<br />

the minimum channel-kilometre price for a tube diameter D„ llt to be k • N"- 2T '<br />

where k = constant<br />

N = number of channels<br />

The value of the constant k depends on which costs one is considering. Fig. 1<br />

shows three curves for £> opt . Curve 1 relates to the first cost, curve 2 to the<br />

annual cost on the basis of 30 and 15 years depreciation period, respectively,<br />

for cable and repeater equipment at a rate of interest of 6 per cent per annum.<br />

Curve 3 relates to the annual cost, but at 30 and 10 years depreciation,<br />

respectively, at the same rate of interest.<br />

"opt<br />

mm<br />

;<br />

i<br />

M><br />

^^^\^^\^<br />

V VI) © 1<br />

| ^!_<br />

Fig. 1<br />

Optimal coaxial tube diameter as function<br />

of number of channels in the system<br />

1 i ' '<br />

i<br />

ii..<br />

N channels<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!