15.11.2014 Views

STOCK TO STUDY: T. Rowe Price Group, Inc ... - BetterInvesting

STOCK TO STUDY: T. Rowe Price Group, Inc ... - BetterInvesting

STOCK TO STUDY: T. Rowe Price Group, Inc ... - BetterInvesting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEATURE | Cover Story<br />

by Danielle L. Schultz<br />

For many of us, <strong>BetterInvesting</strong>’s method ology for picking<br />

stocks has been a durable and reliable guide. But most of us<br />

have investments beyond stocks. Often those investments<br />

are mutual funds. Perhaps it’s because funds are the only<br />

options in our workplace retirement programs or college<br />

savings plans.<br />

Maybe we simply don’t have the time to select<br />

and manage a large number of individual<br />

stocks. We may want to incorporate other<br />

types of assets in our total portfolio.<br />

Mutual funds are often promoted as the no-brainer<br />

solution, but savvy investors know there’s no such<br />

thing. Mutual funds offer great diversification to a portfolio,<br />

but as with all investments, the more knowledgeable<br />

you are, the better choices you make.<br />

Here’s a top 10 list of issues to consider.<br />

1. Don’t Wish Upon a Star<br />

Managers who perform well in a given year are raised<br />

to the heavens by the popular press. Problem is,<br />

they’re about as reliable as a meteoroid. Sooner or later<br />

they flame out, and by the time they garner press<br />

cover age, the oppor tunity is often over.<br />

The performance of active managers — managers<br />

who use their personal research and judgment to<br />

select a fund’s investment mix — may be outstandingly<br />

good or bad over a short period, but over time<br />

research shows that they usually lag index funds<br />

(funds that are passively managed and seek to duplicate<br />

a market index).<br />

In the few cases in which active management has<br />

done better over time, the difference between active<br />

and passive funds has been so small as to be attributable<br />

to nothing more than chance. Pick any decade. You’ll<br />

find spectacular money managers who subsequently<br />

produced stunning losses. As we all know, past performance<br />

is no indicator of future success.<br />

If you want to select investments based on an<br />

assessment of market factors, you often may be better<br />

off selecting individual stocks using Better Investing<br />

principles rather than hoping an active manager will<br />

do it for you.<br />

2. Understand the Costs.<br />

Every week in my financial planning practice I see<br />

clients whose portfolios contain mutual funds for<br />

which they’ve paid high sales commissions and high<br />

management fees, while the same type of investments<br />

could have been made for far lower costs. It’s important<br />

to understand both of these types of costs. There’s<br />

no reason to pay a sales commission for a passively<br />

40 | <strong>BetterInvesting</strong> | March 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!