15.11.2014 Views

Oil & Gas - Watson, Farley & Williams

Oil & Gas - Watson, Farley & Williams

Oil & Gas - Watson, Farley & Williams

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Advising a UK plc on joint venture arrangements relating to a production sharing<br />

agreement with SOCAR (state oil company), Amoco and Monument <strong>Oil</strong> for the<br />

exploration of the Inam Block offshore Azerbaijan<br />

• Advising an international energy trader on the structuring and documentation of a<br />

joint venture with a local chain of petrol stations in Brazil<br />

• Advising an energy trader in relation to a joint venture for the storage and<br />

transportation of hydrocarbons in Congo.<br />

DISPUTE RESOLUTION<br />

• Advising clients on a claim under an all risks cargo policy of insurance following<br />

damage sustained to a jack-up rig whilst being transported from Galveston Texas<br />

to Luwut Malaysia. Addressing, in particular, issues of fortuity and inherent vice<br />

• Acting for PGS Offshore Technology in relation to a claim for a £2m “sailaway”<br />

bonus under an EPC contract for the design, engineering, procurement and<br />

construction of an FPSO. The case turned upon whether the head construction<br />

contractor, Aker <strong>Oil</strong> & <strong>Gas</strong> (UK) Limited, had earned the performance bonus by<br />

substantially completing its scope of work on the date of sailaway, and required an<br />

assessment of the scope of carry-over work to be performed offshore<br />

• Acting for SANA the Italian owner of the semi-submersible oil production platform<br />

known as P36 in long-running High Court proceedings against Petrobas<br />

(represented by Linklaters in London) concerning upgrade works to the rig which<br />

capsized and sank off Brazil in 2001. The case involved complicated technical<br />

issues relating to the construction and financing of the rig and was worth in excess<br />

of US$350m<br />

• Acting for Aban Loyd Chiles in a dispute with ITC of Holland over the failure of<br />

ITC's semi-submersible barge to dock Aban’s rig, the Aban II. Claim centred on<br />

which party was responsible for the failure, and required an investigation into the<br />

technical reasons for failure of the docking operation<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!