15.11.2014 Views

The Many Faces, and Causes, of Unbelief - Apologetics Press

The Many Faces, and Causes, of Unbelief - Apologetics Press

The Many Faces, and Causes, of Unbelief - Apologetics Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> “process theology” as expressed in its current<br />

form essentially is the brainchild <strong>of</strong> philosopher Alfred North<br />

Whitehead, who penned several influential books on the subject,<br />

including Process <strong>and</strong> Reality (1929), Adventures <strong>of</strong> Ideas<br />

(1933), <strong>and</strong> Modes <strong>of</strong> Thought (1938). For those <strong>of</strong> us who are<br />

non-philosophers (or not even very philosophically oriented),<br />

process theology can seem a little like wading into a gently<br />

flowing creek that unexpectedly turns into a raging torrent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first few steps do not begin to prepare you for what is yet<br />

to follow. Allow me to explain.<br />

According to Whitehead (<strong>and</strong> other eminent proponents<br />

<strong>of</strong> process theology like Samuel Alex<strong>and</strong>er, Charles Hartshorne,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Schubert Ogden), God is composed <strong>of</strong> two “poles”<br />

(thus, He is “bipolar,” which is why another synonym for panentheism<br />

is “bipolar theism”). First, there is what is known as<br />

His primordial pole, which is eternal, unchanging, ideal,<br />

<strong>and</strong> beyond the world. Second, however, there is what is<br />

known as His consequent pole, which is temporal, changing,<br />

real, <strong>and</strong> identical to the world. <strong>The</strong> primordial nature <strong>of</strong><br />

God is His “potential” pole—i.e., what He can be. <strong>The</strong> consequent<br />

nature is his “actual” pole—i.e., what He actually is at<br />

any given moment. Geisler <strong>and</strong> Brooks have explained this<br />

as follows:<br />

So the world is not different from God; it is one <strong>of</strong><br />

God’s poles. His potential pole inhabits the world<br />

just like a soul inhabits a body. <strong>The</strong>re it becomes actualized<br />

or real. So what the world is, is what God has<br />

become. As such God is never actually perfect; He is<br />

only striving toward perfection.... So God is always<br />

changing as the world changes. He in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

becoming all that He can be (1989, pp. 48,47, emp. in<br />

orig.).<br />

Since God is in the “process” <strong>of</strong> becoming all that He can be<br />

(sounds like the U.S. Army recruitment campaign slogan,<br />

doesn’t it?), the concept is known as “process theology.” And<br />

if you are wondering right about now if this is just a tad convoluted<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus a bit difficult to follow, let me set your mind<br />

-50­

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!