15.11.2014 Views

The Many Faces, and Causes, of Unbelief - Apologetics Press

The Many Faces, and Causes, of Unbelief - Apologetics Press

The Many Faces, and Causes, of Unbelief - Apologetics Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

at ease. Yes, it is! <strong>The</strong>refore, in order to help explain what all<br />

<strong>of</strong> this means in “plain English,” I would like to provide the<br />

following well-written, simplified summary from Winfried<br />

Corduan’s book, Reasonable Faith.<br />

To underst<strong>and</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> God in Whitehead’s system,<br />

we must come to terms with how Whitehead<br />

wants us to think <strong>of</strong> the world.... Put briefly, rather<br />

than thinking <strong>of</strong> things that change, we ought to think<br />

<strong>of</strong> changes that take on the forms <strong>of</strong> things. Take<br />

the following example. Let us say we are watching a<br />

football game. We see players, referees, cheerleaders,<br />

<strong>and</strong> spectators. <strong>The</strong>y are running, kicking whistling,<br />

clapping, <strong>and</strong> shouting. Whitehead would want<br />

us to reverse the picture <strong>and</strong> think <strong>of</strong> the actions first<br />

with the people second. We observe running, kicking,<br />

whistling, clapping, <strong>and</strong> shouting which has taken on<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> players, referees, cheerleaders, <strong>and</strong> spectators.<br />

<strong>The</strong> action is <strong>of</strong> first order. In fact, it would be<br />

correct to say that we are observing “the football game<br />

event.” This is strange language intended to make<br />

the point that nothing is as fundamental to the world<br />

as change. Whitehead even wanted us to think <strong>of</strong> the<br />

whole universe as one big event.<br />

So when Whitehead says that the world is one big e­<br />

vent, we need to picture it in terms <strong>of</strong> constant change.<br />

Thus the world must consist <strong>of</strong> two parts—or poles—<br />

an actual pole <strong>and</strong> a potential pole. <strong>The</strong> actual pole is<br />

everything that is true <strong>of</strong> the world at a given moment.<br />

What is change? Suppose we bake a cake. We mix together<br />

the ingredients <strong>and</strong> create a batter. <strong>The</strong>n we<br />

put the batter into the oven <strong>and</strong> out comes a cake. We<br />

changed the batter into a cake. <strong>The</strong> batter had the potential<br />

to become a cake, but it was only after the<br />

change took place that it actually was a cake. <strong>The</strong> potential<br />

cake became the actual cake; in other words,<br />

the potential <strong>of</strong> the batter to become a cake was actualized.<br />

All change can be understood in this way.<br />

When something changes, a potential has been actualized.<br />

-51­

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!