16.11.2014 Views

Changes in the Emergent Plant Community of Netley-Libau Marsh ...

Changes in the Emergent Plant Community of Netley-Libau Marsh ...

Changes in the Emergent Plant Community of Netley-Libau Marsh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vegetation change <strong>in</strong> <strong>Netley</strong>-<strong>Libau</strong> <strong>Marsh</strong><br />

Grosshans et al.<br />

METHODS<br />

Aerial Photography and Field<br />

Methods – 2001 Map<br />

<strong>Netley</strong>-<strong>Libau</strong> <strong>Marsh</strong> was photographed as a<br />

mosaic <strong>of</strong> 106 colour <strong>in</strong>frared aerial photographs<br />

on 3 August 2001, when plant growth and biomass<br />

were near full development. Photographs were taken<br />

at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 1,920 m and produced at a scale <strong>of</strong><br />

1:10,000. All photography was done with a Wild<br />

RC-30 15/4 UAG-S large format camera. Film used<br />

was Kodak Aerochrome III IR film type 1443.<br />

Infrared film was used to map <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual emergent plant species or assemblages<br />

based on <strong>the</strong>ir differential reflection <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frared light,<br />

that appears <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al image as shades <strong>of</strong> red.<br />

Colour photocopies were produced <strong>of</strong> all aerial<br />

photographs and placed <strong>in</strong> plastic sheet protectors<br />

for use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field. Vegetation zones and boundaries<br />

were identified on aerial photographs by ground<br />

verification. <strong>Plant</strong> species composition, diversity and<br />

density, as well as neighbour<strong>in</strong>g plant communities<br />

were all noted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field to aid <strong>in</strong> vegetation zone<br />

classification. An <strong>in</strong>terpretive key <strong>of</strong> vegetation<br />

<strong>in</strong>frared signatures for colour <strong>in</strong>frared aerial<br />

photographs was used from Grosshans (2002),<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed primarily by colour, texture, shadow, and<br />

general appearance (Table 1). This key was used <strong>in</strong><br />

conjunction with <strong>the</strong> aerial photos to identify<br />

vegetation boundaries, and create <strong>the</strong> digital<br />

vegetation cover map.<br />

Digital Mapp<strong>in</strong>g – 2001 Map<br />

All 2001 aerial photographs were scanned at 300<br />

dpi us<strong>in</strong>g a Canon flatbed colour copier/scanner. A<br />

Trimble Pathf<strong>in</strong>der Basic Global Position<strong>in</strong>g System<br />

(GPS) receiver was used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field to collect ground<br />

control po<strong>in</strong>ts (Universal Transverse Mercator Zone<br />

14, North American Datum 83) <strong>of</strong> visible landmarks<br />

on <strong>the</strong> aerial photographs to aid <strong>in</strong> georeferenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scanned images. Each image was georeferenced us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collected GPS data and exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

GPS data from digital orthophotographs based on<br />

aerial photography acquired <strong>in</strong> August 1991 (L<strong>in</strong>net<br />

Geomatics Inc. 2001). Images were geometrically<br />

corrected us<strong>in</strong>g ERDAS Imag<strong>in</strong>e 8.5, and used <strong>in</strong><br />

ESRI ArcView 3.2 GIS s<strong>of</strong>tware with <strong>the</strong><br />

“IMAGINE image support” extension. A f<strong>in</strong>al TIFF<br />

image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> photomosaic was created and seams<br />

between photographs were blended us<strong>in</strong>g Adobe<br />

Photoshop 5.5 to produce a large format seamless<br />

color photograph <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire marsh (Figure 3).<br />

The 2001 digital vegetation map was based on<br />

this mosaic <strong>of</strong> georeferenced colour <strong>in</strong>frared<br />

photographs. All digital mapp<strong>in</strong>g was done <strong>in</strong><br />

ArcView. Vegetation areas were created by on-screen<br />

digitiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a polygon <strong>the</strong>me and colour coded with<br />

a unique value-legend type approach based on<br />

vegetation cover type. This approach was adopted<br />

due to sublety <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>of</strong> discrete plant<br />

assemblages (Table 1). The f<strong>in</strong>al vegetation polygon<br />

<strong>the</strong>me was checked for errors us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> “CLU<br />

Quality Control” ArcView extension (Heald 1999).<br />

The map pr<strong>in</strong>touts were created <strong>in</strong> ArcView Layout.<br />

Vegetation Classification – 2001 Map<br />

The vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Netley</strong>-<strong>Libau</strong> <strong>Marsh</strong> was<br />

categorized <strong>in</strong>to five zones: non-vegetated, emergent<br />

vegetation (permanently-seasonally flooded), wet<br />

meadow (seasonally-temporarily flooded), low<br />

prairie (temporary-no flood<strong>in</strong>g) and upland (no<br />

flood<strong>in</strong>g), dist<strong>in</strong>guished by water depth (surface water<br />

or depth to water-table) and plant community<br />

composition (Appendix 2). <strong>Emergent</strong> zones are<br />

permanently to seasonally flooded, generally hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stand<strong>in</strong>g water throughout most, if not all, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g season. <strong>Plant</strong> species found <strong>in</strong> this zone are<br />

also found <strong>in</strong> waterlogged organic soils above <strong>the</strong><br />

water table. Wet meadows are characterized by<br />

flood<strong>in</strong>g for a few weeks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g, with 0 to 0.3<br />

m <strong>of</strong> surface water persist<strong>in</strong>g until mid-summer. Soil<br />

water usually rema<strong>in</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> root<strong>in</strong>g zone<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g season. Low prairies<br />

experience temporary to no flood<strong>in</strong>g, with stand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

water to saturated soil conditions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early spr<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

with most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stand<strong>in</strong>g water lost rapidly to<br />

seepage and evapotranspiration. Soil moisture with<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se areas varies throughout <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g season.<br />

Uplands generally experience little flood<strong>in</strong>g. Surface<br />

water is present only dur<strong>in</strong>g spr<strong>in</strong>g snowmelt and<br />

heavy ra<strong>in</strong>s, and is rapidly lost to seepage and<br />

evapotranspiration.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> 2001 map, <strong>the</strong>se five vegetation zones<br />

were fur<strong>the</strong>r separated <strong>in</strong>to vegetation classes<br />

represented by one or more dom<strong>in</strong>ant species or<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ct species associations. Generally, vegetation<br />

6 DMFS Occasional Publication No. 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!