Vol 3 (1) 2011 - UBM :: Departamentul de Chimie-Biologie
Vol 3 (1) 2011 - UBM :: Departamentul de Chimie-Biologie
Vol 3 (1) 2011 - UBM :: Departamentul de Chimie-Biologie
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Carpathian Journal of Food Science and Technology <strong>2011</strong>, 3(1), 57-62<br />
value of acidity, the wine is contaminated,<br />
not good for consumers and the taste is<br />
acidulated.<br />
Regarding the quantity of total SO 2<br />
(Figure 7) things change. Penicillium<br />
chrysogenum and Phanerochaete<br />
chrysosporium lowered the amount of total<br />
SO 2 , while Penicillium expansum raises the<br />
values.<br />
The amount of ash for healthy wine<br />
should be framed in concentration range 1.3<br />
to 4 g/l. According to the Figure 8 the<br />
quantity of ash for all types of wines is<br />
maximum 4 g/L. So the wines were not<br />
damaged.<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
Based on above experiments, we can<br />
conclu<strong>de</strong> that not every type of fungus can<br />
damaged and contaminate the wine. In the<br />
same time, even if the three fungi had<br />
changes some values of the wine<br />
composition, especially the taste, acidity and<br />
total sulf dioxi<strong>de</strong>, this doesn’t mean that the<br />
wine is fully damaged, but the consumers<br />
are not allowed to drink it because it may<br />
cause health problems<br />
5. References<br />
1. Macici, M., (2008). World’s Wines,<br />
Vremea Publishing, Bucuresti.<br />
2. URL: http://www.disznoko.hu/<br />
3. URL: http://www.mycobank.org/<br />
4. Cotea, D.V., Pomohaci, N.,<br />
Gheorghita, M., (1982). Oenology.<br />
Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing,<br />
Bucuresti.<br />
5. Cotea, D.V., (1985). Oenology<br />
Treaty, <strong>Vol</strong>. I, Ceres Publishing,<br />
Bucuresti.<br />
6. Cotea, D.V., (2010). Wine making<br />
process, Tipo Moldova Publishing,<br />
Iasi.<br />
62