19.11.2014 Views

industrial wireless book special edition - Networking ...

industrial wireless book special edition - Networking ...

industrial wireless book special edition - Networking ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I n d u s t r i a l W i r e l e s s<br />

Will ‘The Internet of Things’<br />

change Industrial Wireless?<br />

The development of an IP-based stack specification Using ZigBee IP created a great deal of interest within<br />

the power and utility industries. But what does all this activity in networked <strong>wireless</strong> development mean for<br />

the Process and Factory Automation sector? Long before governments around the world felt a need to pour<br />

stimulus money into data infrastructure as an investment strategy in its own right, the Process and Factory<br />

Automation businesses had been making quiet progress with dedicated <strong>wireless</strong> technology development. Is<br />

this all about to change with the development of low cost, low power, mass market <strong>wireless</strong> stacks capable of<br />

making direct connections to the Internet asks Frank Ogden<br />

LET US STATE from the outset that WirelessHART<br />

is a good, secure and robust method of<br />

exchanging relatively low rate data around<br />

physically distributed applications without<br />

wires. It also runs the proven PHY and MAC<br />

layers of IEEE802.15.4 which provide an<br />

excellent platform for the higher layers of<br />

<strong>wireless</strong> mesh networking and other features<br />

essential to <strong>wireless</strong> in Process Automation.<br />

So why are we getting so excited about the<br />

appearance of new <strong>wireless</strong> stacks which fit<br />

onto 802.15.4 and are not WirelessHART?<br />

The answer is simple. Enter the words ‘smart<br />

grid’ qualified by the word ‘stimulus’ into<br />

Google and then amaze at the countless big<br />

money initiatives which the search engine<br />

throws up. Then look more closely at the names<br />

involved… Cisco, PG&E, GE, Landis+Gyr, etc,<br />

not to mention a second order of both the<br />

eminently sensible organisations as well as<br />

complete eco-barmies. This is serious stuff and<br />

the money which surrounds it will prime the<br />

development pumps in a way that <strong>wireless</strong> data<br />

network programmes have not seen before. The<br />

money now promised by governments right<br />

around the world (not just in the USA) dwarfs<br />

Process and Factory Automation developments<br />

by orders of magnitude.<br />

In practical terms, this money will (mostly)<br />

mean the development of public utility meters<br />

which can implement SCADA over <strong>wireless</strong><br />

enabling the exchange of billing information,<br />

interactive adjustment of tariffs and control of<br />

both consuming and microgeneration plant. Of<br />

course this might be achieved by throwing some<br />

of those development $billions at new <strong>wireless</strong><br />

protocols designed specifically for smart grid<br />

and nothing else – a kind of WHART for electricity<br />

meters. But it is not going to happen<br />

like that for the same reason that the HCF<br />

<strong>wireless</strong> device protocol is unlikely to achieve<br />

long term dominance in the Process industry:<br />

lack of Internet-compatible direct connectivity.<br />

Gateways can be good<br />

Actually, you can make two good arguments for<br />

addressing HCF and proprietary <strong>wireless</strong> stacks<br />

through network gateways rather than the IPbased<br />

routers – the equivalent device in IPv6 –<br />

for that is what we are really talking about.<br />

Gateways offer security through natural segmentation,<br />

always a good argument when talking<br />

about Process Automation.<br />

The second argument, perhaps cynical, is<br />

even more compelling. If an application does<br />

not conform to Internet standards, then it<br />

becomes a marketing lock provided that you<br />

are large enough to enforce it.<br />

40<br />

British fabless semiconductor company Jennic is just one of many companies around the world attempting to leverage 6LoWPAN. The company’s protocol stack provides a <strong>wireless</strong><br />

connectivity based on the IEEE802.15.4 standard at 2.4GHz allowing embedded devices to communicate <strong>wireless</strong>ly using Internet Protocol (IP). Designed to work with Jennic <strong>wireless</strong><br />

microcontroller, the IP connectivity solution provides a low power single chip implementation for the development of <strong>wireless</strong> networking products that offer multi-year battery life, which<br />

can communicate with other IP devices in an existing network. Point-to-point and star connectivity are supported as standard in IEEE802.15.4, but the device can also connect over a<br />

proprietary networking stack, providing a self-healing cluster tree with IPv6 direct addressing to individual nodes.<br />

If it will work for smart meters, it could also work for remote sensors in a way presently beyond today’s <strong>wireless</strong> Process Automation systems<br />

<strong>industrial</strong> ethernet <strong>book</strong><br />

sponsored by Advantech

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!