21.11.2014 Views

Post-Structuralism: An Indian Preview - Igcollege.org

Post-Structuralism: An Indian Preview - Igcollege.org

Post-Structuralism: An Indian Preview - Igcollege.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of National Seminar on <strong>Post</strong>modern Literary Theory and Literature , Jan. 27-28, 2012, Nanded<br />

A Note on Foucault’s Notion of Discourse<br />

Dr. R.T. Bedre Dept. of English SSJES’ ACS<br />

College, Gangakhed. Dist. Parbhani. (M.S.)<br />

Mr.K.U. Gangarde Researcher and Project<br />

Fellow Department of English at SSJES’ ACS<br />

College, Gangakhed. Dist. Parbhani. (M.S.)<br />

Michel Foucault (1926 –1984) was a<br />

French philosopher, social theorist and historian<br />

of ideas. He was a professor of ‘History of<br />

Systems of Thought’ at the College de France,<br />

and lectured at the University at Buffalo and the<br />

University of California, Berkeley. Foucault is<br />

best known for his critical studies on social<br />

institutions, most notably psychiatry, medicine,<br />

the human sciences and the prison system, as<br />

well as for his work on the history of human<br />

sexuality. His writings on power, knowledge,<br />

and discourse have been widely influential in<br />

academic circles. He was listed as the most cited<br />

scholar in the humanities in 2007 by the ISI Web<br />

of Science (Wikipedia- Foucault). Power,<br />

knowledge, Archaeology, genealogy, episteme,<br />

dispositif, biopower, governmentality,<br />

disciplinary institution, and panopticism are his<br />

other notable ideas which earned him fame all<br />

over the world. His notable works are: Madness<br />

and Civilization (1961), The Birth of the Clinic:<br />

<strong>An</strong> Archaeology of Medical Perception (1963),<br />

Death and the Labyrinth: The World of<br />

Raymond Roussel (1963), Order of Things: <strong>An</strong><br />

Archaeology of the Human Sciences (1966), The<br />

Archaeology of Knowledge (1969), Discipline<br />

and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1977) and<br />

The History of Sexuality (1976). Foucault's<br />

works concentrate upon elucidating the<br />

particular power relations and discourses<br />

involved in different knowledge by way of an<br />

analysis of their respective histories. The present<br />

paper focuses on the Foucauldian notion of<br />

discourse.<br />

The notion of ‘discourse’ plays<br />

important role in contemporary literary theory. It<br />

is central in all the books written by Foucault.<br />

Although it is originated in the disciplines of<br />

Linguistics and Semiotics, it has been extended<br />

up to many branches of human sciences. It has<br />

been used in the academic disciplines such as<br />

literature, history, sociology, psychology,<br />

political science, culture, gender and<br />

postcolonial studies to define, explain and<br />

understand the problems in their respective<br />

fields of study.<br />

Discourse, according to Foucault, is<br />

related to power as it operates by rules of<br />

exclusion. Discourse therefore is controlled by<br />

objects, what can be spoken of; ritual, where and<br />

how one may speak; and the privileged, who<br />

may speak (Wikipedia-discourse). Discourse<br />

constitutes not only the world that we live in, but<br />

also all forms of knowledge and truth. Discourse<br />

generates truth or what some have called trutheffects.<br />

Certain discourses in certain contexts<br />

have the power to convince people to accept<br />

statements as true. Discourse thus is the means<br />

of power and it constitutes knowledge which is<br />

accepted in the society. Therefore, Foucault says<br />

in the first volume of his book ‘History of<br />

Sexuality’ that it is in discourse that power and<br />

knowledge are joined together.<br />

Discourse has become a central term for<br />

the poststructural critics who oppose the<br />

deconstructive method of analyzing the text. M.<br />

H. Abrams explains the concept of discourse as<br />

follows:<br />

In poststructural criticism, discourse …<br />

supplementing (and in some cases<br />

displacing) “text’’ as the name of the<br />

verbal material which is primarily<br />

concern of literary criticism. In poststructural<br />

usage, however, the term is<br />

not confined to conversational passages<br />

but, like “writing,” designates all verbal<br />

constructions and implies the<br />

superficiality of the boundaries between<br />

literary and non literary modes of<br />

signification. Most conspicuously,<br />

99 PLTL-2012: ISBN 978-81-920120-0-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!