23.11.2014 Views

Vol 10, No 3 - Financial Planning Association of Malaysia

Vol 10, No 3 - Financial Planning Association of Malaysia

Vol 10, No 3 - Financial Planning Association of Malaysia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

etirement, you can ease their anxiety<br />

and cure their finertia by helping them<br />

develop an income strategy. The process,<br />

which involves charting the client’s<br />

retirement expenses and sources <strong>of</strong><br />

income, takes the mystery and complexity<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the “magic number” by breaking it<br />

down into categories to which your clients<br />

can relate. You can use charts that look<br />

just like a standard budgeting worksheet,<br />

with estimated discretionary and<br />

nondiscretionary expenses in one table<br />

and retirement savings and investments<br />

in another.<br />

but a complete reversal. Plummeting<br />

home values have damaged a great deal<br />

more than our pocketbooks — many an<br />

ego has been badly bruised.<br />

Adviser Takeaway. Understanding the<br />

complex and deep-seated emotional<br />

attachments people have to their homes<br />

is the first step in helping repair the<br />

damage for clients who made the mistake<br />

<strong>of</strong> viewing their homes as retirement<br />

accounts. Getting them to see that a<br />

house is a shelter and not an investment<br />

is the first step. If you can convince<br />

them <strong>of</strong> that, they will be more open to<br />

considering alternative options.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the solutions are surprisingly<br />

simple, but can have a tangible effect on<br />

a very complex problem. For example,<br />

retirees who don’t have a lot <strong>of</strong> equity<br />

in their homes might want to consider<br />

renting a smaller house in retirement.<br />

For clients who plan to stay in their<br />

homes, overpaying their mortgages by<br />

US$<strong>10</strong>0 or so a month can save them<br />

tens <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> dollars over the life<br />

<strong>of</strong> the loan and dramatically reduce the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> years they will be paying <strong>of</strong>f<br />

their homes. 1 This last option is a perfect<br />

example <strong>of</strong> how a small, seemingly<br />

inconsequential decision can have a<br />

significant effect on the retirement<br />

planning continuum.<br />

Number Numbness<br />

Whether it is the staggering sums<br />

reported in relation to the federal deficit<br />

and national debt, or the elusive “number”<br />

representing an adequate retirement<br />

nest egg, people are easily overwhelmed<br />

— and subsequently numbed — by the<br />

sheer size <strong>of</strong> numbers that seem too large<br />

to comprehend. Number numbness leads<br />

to what I have dubbed “finertia,” which is<br />

the paralysis that sets in when investors<br />

try to make sense <strong>of</strong> contradictory and<br />

confusing financial information. Finertia<br />

makes the prospect <strong>of</strong> planning for<br />

retirement too complex to face, which<br />

may explain why so many people have<br />

opted to simply do nothing.<br />

For most <strong>of</strong> your clients, the most<br />

numbing number <strong>of</strong> all is the amount<br />

they need to comfortably retire. Even you,<br />

as an experienced financial pr<strong>of</strong>essional,<br />

cannot say for certain what that number<br />

should be. A Monte Carlo simulation<br />

can supposedly account for hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />

thousands <strong>of</strong> potential market scenarios,<br />

but no formula is advanced enough to<br />

predict the future — there are simply<br />

too many variables. The task is further<br />

complicated by the human emotions<br />

involved — you must factor in your<br />

clients’ changing needs and desires,<br />

their expectations, and the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

unanticipated family situations or market<br />

movements. Macro issues such as inflation,<br />

longevity, healthcare, and taxes add yet<br />

another layer <strong>of</strong> complexity.<br />

Number numbness is not only relegated<br />

to vast quantities; it can also take the form<br />

<strong>of</strong> “bigness bias,” which is the tendency to<br />

be indifferent to small numbers such as 1<br />

or 2 percent. Overlooking small numbers<br />

can be a big problem when it comes to<br />

accounting for taxes and inflation in a<br />

long-term financial plan. Consider the<br />

investors who were making big returns<br />

on equity investments during the 18-year<br />

bull market <strong>of</strong> 1982–2000. At the time,<br />

inflation was barely perceptible at 1 or 2<br />

percent annually, but it was still slowly<br />

eating away at the purchasing power <strong>of</strong><br />

every dollar investors earned.<br />

Adviser Takeaway. While you may be<br />

powerless to predict the exact dollar<br />

amount your clients will need for<br />

Retirement planning is never going<br />

to get less complex; in fact, the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> the financial meltdown we have<br />

just experienced will likely exacerbate<br />

the issue for many years to come. As<br />

an adviser, it is your job to handle the<br />

complexity based on your knowledge and<br />

experience, while making the process as<br />

simple as possible for your clients. Begin<br />

with this lesson: every large amount<br />

starts as a small amount — the key to<br />

making your money grow is time and<br />

discipline. It may seem overly simplistic,<br />

but for anyone who is intimidated by the<br />

numbers involved in accumulating the<br />

money needed for retirement, this is a<br />

compelling and comforting concept.<br />

Layering—The Proxy Perception<br />

Just as Las Vegas has learned that people<br />

will toss chips around far more liberally<br />

than cash, the credit card industry knows<br />

very well that people treat those little<br />

plastic rectangles differently than actual<br />

money. Credit cards, debit cards, and<br />

electronic bank statements are quick<br />

and convenient, but these automated<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> payment create a psychological<br />

disconnect that makes money more<br />

opaque to consumers. In behavioural<br />

finance, the concept is known as<br />

“layering” — a term borrowed from moneylaundering<br />

that refers to the layers <strong>of</strong><br />

separation from the place where the<br />

money was originally earned. The thicker<br />

the layers, the greater the opportunity for<br />

clients to make poor financial decisions.<br />

The physical proxy <strong>of</strong> the check or<br />

credit card creates one layer; we are<br />

further removed from our money by the<br />

expediency and opaqueness <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />

transaction process at most retail outlets.<br />

Signatures are seldom required when we<br />

use credit or debit cards, and quite <strong>of</strong>ten,<br />

“Finertia makes the prospect <strong>of</strong> planning for<br />

retirement too complex to face, which may explain<br />

why so many people have opted to simply do nothing.”<br />

The 4E Journal 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!