24.11.2014 Views

PARISH CHURCHES? how do we keep our - Ecclesiological Society

PARISH CHURCHES? how do we keep our - Ecclesiological Society

PARISH CHURCHES? how do we keep our - Ecclesiological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

15<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Purpose of this report<br />

Recently the Economist ran a short piece, ‘Tithing trouble’<br />

(8 Nov 2003), on the Church of England (CoE). It<br />

pointed out that, during the last ten years, Sunday<br />

attendance at CoE churches fell by about 17%, and the<br />

number of clergy dropped by a similar amount. Yet the<br />

number of church buildings fell by less than 2%. Thus<br />

fe<strong>we</strong>r people are supporting the same number of church<br />

buildings.<br />

A more anec<strong>do</strong>tal piece in the Financial Times, ‘Church<br />

changes but the churches stay’ (29 Nov 2003), explored<br />

what this meant in a rural setting. The author described<br />

<strong>how</strong> a number of magni#cent churches, their to<strong>we</strong>rs<br />

<strong>do</strong>minant in the West Country landscape, <strong>we</strong>re being<br />

cared for by small congregations. He took the view that<br />

this was not sustainable in the longer term: the<br />

government should step in.<br />

These articles are serious j<strong>our</strong>nalism, yet the picture<br />

they paint is impressionistic, based necessarily on limited<br />

evidence. I say ‘necessarily’, because there has not been, so<br />

far as I know, any recent attempt to collect together the<br />

key facts and #gures regarding the up<strong>keep</strong> of parish<br />

church buildings. That is the purpose of this paper.<br />

It is intended to be factual and objective, and not to<br />

promote a particular point of view, except for the<br />

underlying assumption that many church buildings are of<br />

intrinsic value. It is not my intention to make<br />

recommendations: rather to contribute to a debate.<br />

The views expressed are my own, and should not<br />

be taken as representative of those of of#cers or<br />

members of the <strong>Ecclesiological</strong> <strong>Society</strong>.<br />

Scope<br />

For practical reasons, the report is limited to Anglican<br />

churches in England. It rules out larger church buildings,<br />

such as abbeys and cathedrals. It also excludes places of<br />

worship of other denominations. I have used the word<br />

‘church’ to mean ‘Anglican parish church, parochial<br />

chapel, mission church, etc. in England’, except in a very<br />

few places where I have made clear that it has a different<br />

meaning.<br />

Urban and rural churches<br />

Urban churches differ from rural ones, for example in<br />

typical size of congregation, role in the community, age<br />

and size of the church building, and average grade of<br />

listing. For various reasons, I found more detailed<br />

evidence about rural churches than urban ones.<br />

Unfortunately, this may give the impression that the<br />

former deserve more attention, when this is not the case.<br />

Corrections, comments and further information<br />

I actively <strong>we</strong>lcome comments and corrections. These<br />

should be sent to me c/o the <strong>Ecclesiological</strong> <strong>Society</strong> either<br />

by email or by letter, using the addresses on the rear of the<br />

title page. I am particularly interested in any evidence<br />

which con$icts with that presented here, ans<strong>we</strong>rs any of<br />

the questions I have raised, or introduces new aspects.<br />

Individual anec<strong>do</strong>tes are of less interest, unless they raise<br />

general issues.<br />

Corrections and new material will be published<br />

on the <strong>Society</strong>’s <strong>we</strong>bsite, . The<br />

<strong>we</strong>bsite also links directly to s<strong>our</strong>ce material on the <strong>we</strong>b,<br />

and it has background statistical data and graphs which<br />

there was not room to publish here.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

I could not have pulled this paper together without the<br />

help of a large number of people, who gave generously of<br />

their time and expertise. For the most part, they are not<br />

mentioned by name, to avoid any confusion bet<strong>we</strong>en the<br />

assistance they gave me privately and the public stance of<br />

their organisation. They know who they are: I hope they<br />

know <strong>how</strong> grateful I am. Needless to say, any errors which<br />

remain are my responsibility.<br />

I also acknowledge the kindness of those who allo<strong>we</strong>d<br />

their work or publications to be extensively quoted,<br />

including various anonymous contributors, the Church<br />

Times, and Leslie Francis, Jeremy Martineau and Acora<br />

publishing, authors and publishers respectively of Rural<br />

Mission. I apologise if there has been any unintentional<br />

breach of copyright; if noti#ed, I will put the matter right<br />

in any future edition.<br />

The larger picture<br />

In preparing this article, I have been humbled by the<br />

struggle of those who every day have to balance pastoral<br />

needs with those of stone and mortar. I hope my<br />

somewhat cold-blooded focus on buildings will not lead<br />

anyone to suppose that I am ignorant of, or unconcerned<br />

by, the larger picture.<br />

Anonymous comments in boxes All<br />

anonymous comments are from different<br />

people, except in the case of two<br />

individuals, one appearing under the<br />

pseu<strong>do</strong>nym of ‘A student of rural<br />

churches’, the other as ‘A frequent visitor<br />

to churches’, each of whose comments are<br />

split bet<strong>we</strong>en two different boxes.<br />

Approximations and costs Figures in<br />

tables are rounded, where this makes it<br />

easier to see the overall pattern, so there<br />

will be rounding errors in some totals.<br />

The Building Index has been used to<br />

bring historical costs up to 2002 money.<br />

S<strong>our</strong>ces Notes at the end of each section<br />

normally give short references only; fuller<br />

bibliographic detail will be found in the<br />

Bibliography. Where statistics are not<br />

referenced, they are from Church Statistics<br />

2001, details of which will be found in the<br />

Bibliography.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!