25.11.2014 Views

Download a PDF of this issue - Field Exchange - Emergency ...

Download a PDF of this issue - Field Exchange - Emergency ...

Download a PDF of this issue - Field Exchange - Emergency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Research<br />

benefits to programmes and communities.<br />

Targets for research output should be set (e.g.<br />

one or two research papers each year submitted<br />

to a peer-reviewed journal), with financial<br />

and technical support continued when targets<br />

have been met and termination <strong>of</strong> support if<br />

targets have been missed. Young national<br />

researchers should have the opportunity to<br />

present scientific abstracts and participate at<br />

regional and international conferences, and<br />

more attention should be paid to teaching the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> how to write scientific papers<br />

and to mentoring.<br />

Rachel Bezner Kerr, Malawi, 2011<br />

Attention must also be paid to the problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> poor access to up-to-date scientific literature,<br />

and despite laudable initiatives (such as the<br />

Health InterNetwork Access to Research<br />

Initiative), <strong>this</strong> remains a barrier in low-income<br />

countries. Free and open access for all articles <strong>of</strong><br />

interest to low-income countries is urgently<br />

needed. For example, Médecins Sans Frontières<br />

(MSF) has negotiated with publishers to allow<br />

free access to all articles written by its staff.<br />

The distinct role for NGOs in operational<br />

research should be recognised for two main<br />

reasons. First, NGOs such as MSF <strong>of</strong>ten work<br />

in conflict settings, with marginalised and<br />

vulnerable populations, or with neglected<br />

diseases. Academics rarely have access to such<br />

settings, and national programmes might<br />

decide they do not have sufficient resources to<br />

study them. Research in these areas is, nevertheless,<br />

needed to better understand how to<br />

manage questions such as mental health <strong>issue</strong>s<br />

in war zones, treatment and diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />

neglected diseases, or <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

care in slum settings. Secondly, NGOs are, by<br />

mandate, implementers and can thus be<br />

involved in the translation <strong>of</strong> research findings<br />

into policy and practice. If they have skills in<br />

research and advocacy as well as sufficient<br />

financial and human resources, then they<br />

probably have the potential to actively engage<br />

in operational research and help change practice.<br />

However, NGOs are sometimes not the<br />

appropriate entities for designing or implementing<br />

research. They might lack the<br />

institutional support, culture, and skills for<br />

interacting with national programmes and<br />

decision makers. NGO focus might be on solving<br />

localised, short-term problems, they might<br />

have had little exposure to systems thinking<br />

.and they might lack the training and capacity<br />

to do rigorous research. They might also have<br />

a rapid turnover <strong>of</strong> staff, which hinders the<br />

sustainability <strong>of</strong> research and the ability to<br />

build up trust and understanding with country<br />

partners. These points might explain why<br />

NGOs rarely undertake research, are rarely<br />

asked by country programmes to do so, and<br />

why the research they do undertake is sometimes<br />

badly done, with little or no programme<br />

impact.<br />

The authors conclude that they have made<br />

the case for the importance <strong>of</strong> operational<br />

research as a necessary component <strong>of</strong> health<br />

programming in low-income countries. What<br />

is needed now is further development <strong>of</strong> operational-research<br />

capacity, allocation <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

resources, and the need for different participants<br />

such as international and national<br />

academic institutions, national programme<br />

managers, and NGOs to work together in<br />

promoting operational research.<br />

Margaret Shonga, participating farmer, her<br />

husband Donald Gondwe and their baby,<br />

standing in a field <strong>of</strong> sorghum<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> agricultural and nutrition<br />

education projects on child health in<br />

Malawi Summary <strong>of</strong> published research 1<br />

A recent study set out to investigate<br />

whether children in households involved<br />

in a participatory agriculture and nutrition<br />

intervention had improved growth<br />

compared to children in matched comparable<br />

households. The study also explored<br />

whether the level <strong>of</strong> involvement and<br />

length <strong>of</strong> time in the project had an effect<br />

on child growth.<br />

The Soils, Food and Healthy<br />

Communities project (SFHC) was initiated<br />

by Ekwendeni Hospital and aimed to<br />

improve child nutritional status amongst<br />

smallholder farmers in a rural area in<br />

northern Malawi. In villages surrounding<br />

Ekwendeni, a town in Mzimba district,<br />

Esnai Ngwira, participating farmer, and<br />

her children, standing beside her maize<br />

field grown after legume residue buried<br />

into the ground<br />

Rachel Bezner Kerr, Malawi, 2011<br />

over half <strong>of</strong> the smallholder families experience<br />

food insecurity every year. Malaria<br />

is endemic and child malnutrition rates are<br />

similar to the national average at 48%.<br />

Agricultural interventions involved intercropping<br />

legumes and visits from farmer<br />

researchers, while nutrition education<br />

involved home visits and group meetings.<br />

The study employed a prospective<br />

quasi-experimental approach comparing<br />

baseline and follow up data in intervention<br />

villages with matched subjects in comparison<br />

villages. Mixed model analyses were<br />

conducted on standardised child growth<br />

scores (weight- and height-for-age Z-<br />

scores), controlling for child age and<br />

testing for effects <strong>of</strong> length <strong>of</strong> time and<br />

intensity <strong>of</strong> village involvement in the<br />

intervention.<br />

Participants in intervention villages<br />

were self-selected and control participants<br />

were matched by age and household food<br />

security status <strong>of</strong> the child. Over a six year<br />

period, nine surveys were conducted<br />

taking 3,838 height and weight measures <strong>of</strong><br />

children under the age <strong>of</strong> 3 years.<br />

The study found that there was an<br />

improvement over initial conditions <strong>of</strong> up<br />

to 0.6 in weight-for-age (WAZ) Z-score<br />

(WAZ: from -0.4 (sd 0.5) to 0.3 (sd 0.4)) for<br />

children in the longest involved villages,<br />

and an improvement over initial conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.8 in WAZ for children in the most<br />

intensely involved villages (from -0.6 (sd<br />

0.4) to 0.2 (sd 0.4)).<br />

The authors conclude that longterm<br />

efforts to improve child nutrition through<br />

participatory agricultural interventions<br />

had a significant effect on child growth.<br />

1<br />

Bezner Kerr R, Berti P and Shumba L (2011). Effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> a participatory agriculture and nutrition education<br />

project on child growth in northern Malawi. Public<br />

Health Nutrition 14 (8), 1466-1472<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!