Download a PDF of this issue - Field Exchange - Emergency ...
Download a PDF of this issue - Field Exchange - Emergency ...
Download a PDF of this issue - Field Exchange - Emergency ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Field</strong> Article<br />
staff in Niger and Ethiopia, further audits were<br />
conducted at manufacturers in Malawi, the<br />
Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong> the Congo,<br />
Mozambique, Madagascar and Tanzania and<br />
resulted in their approval for local purchases to<br />
UNICEF. The suppliers listed in Table 3 are<br />
authorised to sell RUTF to UNICEF’s country<br />
programmes locally. As <strong>of</strong> 2010, about 23% <strong>of</strong><br />
the RUTF purchased by UNICEF was sourced<br />
locally.<br />
As programme demand and production<br />
capacity increased, so did the volume <strong>of</strong><br />
UNICEF procurement, in terms <strong>of</strong> the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> MT purchased and the number <strong>of</strong> countries<br />
placing orders. After a steady increase from<br />
2000 to 2008, procurement <strong>of</strong> RUTF decreased<br />
not because <strong>of</strong> declining needs but as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
resource mobilisation challenges caused by the<br />
global economic crisis and availability <strong>of</strong> stocks<br />
in countries from 2008. However, orders have<br />
rebounded in 2010 and by mid-year had<br />
surpassed 2009 levels, reaching 20,690 MT as <strong>of</strong><br />
year-end (2010) (for more details see Table 4).<br />
Forecasting<br />
The growing demand for RUTF, production<br />
capacity constraints and the volatility <strong>of</strong> prices<br />
<strong>of</strong> raw materials made forecasting <strong>of</strong> demand<br />
increasingly necessary. UNICEF first undertook<br />
global forecasting to collect information on<br />
needs for RUTF and other nutrition products in<br />
January 2009. This resulted not only in forecasting<br />
<strong>of</strong> global product needs (used for the<br />
bidding process) but also contributed to a better<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the scale <strong>of</strong> implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> CMSAM.<br />
The 2010 forecast indicated that UNICEF<br />
currently is implementing CMSAM in about 55<br />
countries, where there are 6.1 million children<br />
with SAM. UNICEF country programmes<br />
intended to reach 1.8 million children (about 30<br />
per cent), revealing a large gap in coverage,<br />
especially given the 20 million children estimated<br />
to be suffering from SAM worldwide.<br />
RUTF Pricing<br />
Peanut-based RUTF consists <strong>of</strong> milk powder<br />
(30%), sugar (28%), peanut butter or paste<br />
(25%), vegetable oil (15%) and vitamin and<br />
mineral premix (1.6%). 4 The product is packed<br />
in standard foil sachets. The milk and packaging<br />
material (aluminum foil) are the most<br />
expensive components, followed by the premix,<br />
peanut butter, sugar and oil.<br />
Somewhat surprisingly, the entry <strong>of</strong> new<br />
suppliers into the market has not resulted in<br />
any dramatic drops in price, for a number <strong>of</strong><br />
reasons. One possible reason might be that new<br />
suppliers do not have the large production<br />
volumes that usually result in lower prices, and<br />
are also faced with high-start-up costs.<br />
Prices <strong>of</strong> globally purchased RUTF<br />
The pricing structure in the LTAs is complex<br />
because <strong>of</strong> volume discounts, payment terms,<br />
currency used and other factors. The initial<br />
price paid by UNICEF for RUTF in 2001 was<br />
about €41.50 (56.80 USD) per carton. In 2006, as<br />
the average size <strong>of</strong> orders began to increase,<br />
Table 4: UNICEF Global Purchases <strong>of</strong> RUTF, 2000-10 (in MT)<br />
Countries<br />
ordering<br />
RUTF<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />
1 4 6 7 8 17 26 41 48 45 52<br />
Total 3 84 57 109 344 1,793 2,697 4,552 10,741 8,129 20,690<br />
Nutriset proposed scaled prices for larger<br />
orders, and the price decreased gradually to<br />
about €35.20 (48 USD) per carton in 2011.<br />
However, <strong>this</strong> drop in price was masked by<br />
fluctuations in the rate <strong>of</strong> exchange between the<br />
euro and the United States dollar, because the<br />
price is fixed in euros, as proposed by Nutriset.<br />
The RUTF prices <strong>of</strong>fered to UNICEF by other<br />
suppliers range from 48.00 USD to 56.50 USD<br />
per carton in 2010.<br />
Prices <strong>of</strong> locally procured RUTF<br />
Local producers import almost all <strong>of</strong> the ingredients<br />
and the packaging material, most <strong>of</strong><br />
which are subject to import duties. Often the<br />
price <strong>of</strong>fered initially is too high to justify local<br />
purchase on a cost basis alone, even considering<br />
the added cost <strong>of</strong> freight.<br />
Supply Division carefully scrutinises the<br />
prices proposed by local companies in order to<br />
assure best value for money. They are compared<br />
to the landed cost <strong>of</strong> globally procured RUTF<br />
(price at the factory plus freight cost to the final<br />
destination) and when found too high, UNICEF<br />
attempt to negotiate a lower price.<br />
The prices <strong>of</strong> locally produced RUTF vary<br />
significantly among the different suppliers. In<br />
2010, the local prices ranged between 57.00<br />
USD (in Madagascar) and 69.00 USD per carton<br />
(in Mozambique).<br />
Freight costs<br />
RUTF is a heavy and bulky product, with a<br />
course <strong>of</strong> treatment for one child (one carton)<br />
weighing about 15kg. The 16,000 MT <strong>of</strong> RUTF<br />
purchased <strong>of</strong>f shore in 2010, filled 830 40-foot<br />
containers. Shipping the product by sea is the<br />
most economical option, but air shipment<br />
might be required when RUTF is needed for<br />
emergency response to natural disasters,<br />
drought or political instability. Air freight <strong>of</strong><br />
RUTF increases the landed cost by 100 per cent<br />
whereas sea freight only by 10 per cent.<br />
In 2008, nearly 35% <strong>of</strong> RUTF purchased by<br />
UNICEF had to be transported by air, at a cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> $8.5 million, in order to reach the beneficiaries<br />
on time. By 2010, less than 1% <strong>of</strong> the RUTF<br />
had to be transported by air, costing less than<br />
$400,000. The decrease in shipment by air is a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> RUTF supply chain analysis that<br />
suggested a number <strong>of</strong> tools to reduce freight<br />
costs. These included introductions <strong>of</strong> forecasting<br />
<strong>of</strong> country programming needs,<br />
development <strong>of</strong> supplier base in locations close<br />
to where the product is used and prepositioning<br />
<strong>of</strong> stock in areas closer to emergency-prone<br />
countries (e.g. Dubai for the Horn <strong>of</strong> Africa and<br />
Ghana or Cameroon for the Sahel region).<br />
Issues for future consideration<br />
As more countries adopt and/or scale up<br />
CMSAM to treat SAM, the need for RUTF will<br />
continue to increase. Supply Division will<br />
continue to refine its procurement strategy and<br />
work with UNICEF’s Programme Division and<br />
Table 3: UNICEF-approved local RUTF suppliers<br />
Global supplier<br />
Product Name<br />
1. STA (Niger) Plumpy Nut®<br />
2. Hilina (Ethiopia) Plumpy Nut®<br />
3. Project Peanut Butter ( Malawi) Plumpy Nut®<br />
4. Valid Nutrition (Malawi) Plumpy Nut®<br />
5. Amwili (DR Congo) Plumpy Nut®<br />
6. JAM (Mozambique) Plumpy Nut®<br />
7. Power Foods (Tanzania) Plumpy Nut®<br />
external partners to address a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>issue</strong>s<br />
that could affect RUTF availability and accessibility<br />
for the final beneficiaries.<br />
UNICEF sees the continued diversification<br />
<strong>of</strong> the supplier base, with more qualified manufacturers<br />
in countries and regions closer to the<br />
end-users, as an important concern. This will<br />
facilitate the eventual transfer <strong>of</strong> CMSAM and<br />
use <strong>of</strong> RUTF from UNICEF and NGOs to<br />
national authorities.<br />
Building a strong network <strong>of</strong> smaller suppliers<br />
in countries with the highest incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
SAM therefore remains a priority. The work is<br />
ongoing with potential manufacturers in Sierra<br />
Leone, Uganda and Rwanda in order for them<br />
to become part <strong>of</strong> UNICEF-approved manufacturers.<br />
However in the process <strong>of</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong><br />
UNICEF approved-manufacturers, the focus on<br />
product quality and safety shall remain central.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The Supply Division strategy to increase the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> RUTF and assure a sustainable<br />
and diverse supplier base has accomplished its<br />
main goals. In 10 years, the supplier base has<br />
grown from one global supplier in Europe to 19<br />
global and local manufacturers in Africa,<br />
Europe and Americas. The seven local suppliers<br />
are in countries where RUTF is used, and more<br />
local manufacturers are expected to be<br />
approved in the near future. Even with <strong>this</strong><br />
substantial growth in production capacity,<br />
quality standards have been maintained.<br />
Forecasting <strong>of</strong> demand has been systematised<br />
and orders can be filled promptly when they<br />
are placed on time. Supply Division continues<br />
to work with UNICEF country <strong>of</strong>fices to refine<br />
forecasting <strong>of</strong> demand and to work with suppliers<br />
to manage global production. Air freight<br />
costs have been reduced dramatically as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> these improvements, and stocks are being<br />
prepositioned in key regions to allow for rapid<br />
response when necessary.<br />
As outlined above, the major future challenge<br />
is the potential increased demand for RUTF as<br />
countries adopt and expand CMSAM. Supply<br />
Division will continue to work with suppliers,<br />
country <strong>of</strong>fices, UNICEF’s Programme Division,<br />
and external partners on development <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainable RUTF supply chain.<br />
For more information, contact: Jan Komrska,<br />
email: jkomrska@unicef.org<br />
4<br />
Mark J. Manary. Local production and provision <strong>of</strong> ready-touse<br />
therapeutic food (RUTF) spread for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
severe childhood malnutrition. Food and Nutrition Bulletin,<br />
vol. 27, no. 3 (supplement) 2006, The United Nations<br />
University<br />
Table 2: UNICEF-approved global RUTF suppliers<br />
Global supplier<br />
Product Name<br />
1. Nutriset (France) Plumpy Nut®<br />
2. Vitaset (Dominican Republic) Plumpy Nut®<br />
3. Diva Nutritional Products (South Africa) Generic name***<br />
4. Insta EPZ (Kenya) Generic name<br />
5. Challenge Dairy (United States)* Generic name<br />
6. Tabatchnick Fine Foods (United States) Nutty Butta<br />
7. Compact (India) EeZee Paste TM<br />
8. Compact (Norway) EeZee Paste TM<br />
9. Edesia (United States) Plumpy Nut®<br />
10. Nutrivita (India) Plumpy Nut®<br />
11. JB/Tanjaka Foods (Madagascar)** Plumpy Nut®<br />
12. Mana Nutritive Aid Products (United Generic name<br />
States)<br />
*Dairy-based, not peanut-based, RUTF.<br />
**The first company located in programmatic country capable <strong>of</strong> exporting RUTF<br />
***Supplier agreed to remove branded name Imunut from the labels<br />
47