MAGAZINE - Realview
MAGAZINE - Realview
MAGAZINE - Realview
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SUSTAINABILITY<br />
Stuck in second<br />
on carbon scheme<br />
Although many local organisations are starting to prepare for<br />
the inevitability of a carbon-constrained economy, it seems<br />
that for most it is still an uphill battle.<br />
While Australian businesses are beginning<br />
the journey of adapting to emerging<br />
carbon constraints, the downside<br />
is that there is a real lack of understanding<br />
about the proposed Carbon<br />
Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) and a worrying surge<br />
in regulation associated with greenhouse gas emissions.<br />
These are the overriding findings in a national survey<br />
into business readiness for climate change conducted by<br />
the Australian Industry Group (Ai Group) and KPMG,<br />
titled Gearing Up: Business Readiness for Climate<br />
Change. Based on responses from 400 businesses in the<br />
manufacturing, construction and services sector, it examines<br />
what stage they are at in adapting to emerging carbon<br />
constraints, how well they are prepared for the<br />
introduction of a national emissions trading scheme and<br />
the extent of regulatory burdens in the area.<br />
“There are plenty of very encouraging signs that businesses<br />
have begun to take active steps to measure and<br />
manage their carbon footprints,” says Ai Group chief<br />
executive Heather Ridout. “Businesses also have strong<br />
plans to take these initial steps further over the coming<br />
few years.”<br />
However, the survey also points to some significant<br />
problem areas.<br />
“Businesses are not yet well informed about the Commonwealth<br />
Government’s proposed CPRS,” she acknowledges.<br />
“While some have a very good understanding of<br />
the key elements of the proposal, this is far from widespread.<br />
There is clearly a great deal more that needs to<br />
be done before we can assume business is adequately<br />
prepared for the scheme and its impacts.”<br />
According to KPMG national partner in charge of<br />
Sustainability, Climate Change and Water, Jennifer Westacott,<br />
the firm’s work with clients in this space has<br />
shown time and again that the complexity and practical<br />
challenges of being ready to respond to big regulatory<br />
and economic change cannot be underestimated.<br />
“One of the<br />
biggest concerns<br />
for business is<br />
the disturbing<br />
proliferation<br />
of regulatory<br />
measures<br />
in the climate<br />
change area in<br />
recent times<br />
– and the strong<br />
expectation of<br />
more to come”<br />
“It is essential for business to move beyond a simple<br />
compliance focus to a comprehensive business strategy<br />
that creates value and competitive advantage,” she maintains.<br />
“While some companies are leading the way and<br />
making good progress, there is much work to be done.<br />
It is critical that government and business factor in realistic<br />
lead times for all sectors of the Australian economy<br />
to be ready for this significant change.”<br />
One of the biggest concerns for business is the disturbing<br />
proliferation of regulatory measures in the climate<br />
change area in recent times – and the strong expectation<br />
of more to come. Notwithstanding some promising initial<br />
comments by the Commonwealth Government, as Ridout<br />
notes, there is yet to be any significant streamlining of<br />
regulation concerning greenhouse gas emissions.<br />
“These findings accord with a recent report by the<br />
Productivity Commission in which it counted no less<br />
than 244 regulatory measures related to greenhouse gas<br />
emissions administered by 56 different agencies,” she<br />
says. “This is emerging as a major failure of policy in<br />
Australia. The Government needs to put right at the top<br />
of the policy agenda a plan with clearly defined targets<br />
aimed at getting rid of unnecessary and productivitydamaging<br />
climate change regulations.”<br />
26 RISK August 2009