Life Sciences Outlook 2012 Dutch biotech companies ... - NautaDutilh
Life Sciences Outlook 2012 Dutch biotech companies ... - NautaDutilh
Life Sciences Outlook 2012 Dutch biotech companies ... - NautaDutilh
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
However, the government could become more<br />
effective by making a longer-term commitment to<br />
the industry, for instance through the creation of an<br />
‘NIB’. The entire sector has a long-term investment<br />
horizon; short-term policies can easily lead to<br />
mismatches.<br />
• Capital scarcity for VCs. In the Netherlands<br />
there is a relatively large base of venture capital<br />
investors in both the seed and growth stages.<br />
Currently, however, they face a very unfavourable<br />
climate for raising new capital. This may result<br />
in a consolidation or even cause some of them<br />
to retreat from the market, potentially posing a<br />
significant threat to the country’s <strong>biotech</strong> sector.<br />
Government co-investments in the seed and<br />
growth phases and participation by family offices<br />
and charities can only go so far to compensate for<br />
this reduction of available funds.<br />
• Closely-knit ecosystem <strong>biotech</strong>s, VCs and Big<br />
Pharma. VCs are perceived to be an important<br />
driving force behind the forging of ever-closer<br />
relationships between <strong>Dutch</strong> <strong>biotech</strong>s and Big<br />
Pharma; a true ecosystem is developing.<br />
- At an increasingly early stage of the life cycle of<br />
<strong>biotech</strong>s, they are groomed for a partnership<br />
with or acquisition by Big Pharma. According<br />
to 60% of the respondents to our survey this<br />
is the predominant strategic goal of <strong>biotech</strong><br />
<strong>companies</strong>. Given the increasing costs and<br />
complexity involved in the development of new<br />
drugs, most industry professionals no longer<br />
consider it a realistic option to do this as an<br />
independent company funded only by VC<br />
investors.<br />
- A contributing factor is that IPOs are not<br />
considered to be a realistic exit route for<br />
most <strong>biotech</strong> <strong>companies</strong> either now or in the<br />
foreseeable future. This is due mainly to the<br />
market climate, but also to a lack of specialized<br />
institutional investors.<br />
- Big Pharma is increasingly outsourcing R&D<br />
activities (usually via a corporate VC arm) to<br />
early-stage <strong>biotech</strong> <strong>companies</strong>, in an attempt<br />
to boost overall productivity in this area.<br />
• The Netherlands as ‘feeder’ nation? The current<br />
trend is for <strong>biotech</strong> <strong>companies</strong> to be taken over by<br />
or otherwise become part of Big Pharma, often at<br />
or near the stage of the phase II clinical trials. The<br />
Netherlands may well become a breeding ground<br />
for valuable new medicines, medical devices and<br />
technology which at some point in the <strong>biotech</strong><br />
company’s life cycle are passed on to Big Pharma.<br />
Subsequently, the <strong>biotech</strong>’s management and<br />
researchers become available for new start-ups.<br />
• Creation of <strong>Dutch</strong> champions? Particularly in view<br />
of the funding situation, it is considered unlikely<br />
that a large, independent and profitable <strong>biotech</strong><br />
company will develop in the Netherlands. In the<br />
current scenario, the creation of a new <strong>Dutch</strong><br />
champion such as Crucell is likely to be the<br />
exception than the rule.<br />
<strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong> <strong>biotech</strong> <strong>companies</strong>: from start-up to exit<br />
41