The DaVinci Myth vs. The Gospel Truth - Online Christian Library
The DaVinci Myth vs. The Gospel Truth - Online Christian Library
The DaVinci Myth vs. The Gospel Truth - Online Christian Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ERRORS IN THE DA VINCI CODE<br />
Gallic Wars; we have ten known manuscript copies.<br />
Plato’s Tetralogies? <strong>The</strong>re are seven known manuscript<br />
copies in existence. <strong>The</strong> New Testament, however, is in a<br />
league of its own with more than 5,000 manuscript<br />
copies in the original Greek alone.<br />
Outside the Bible, the best attested writings of antiquity<br />
are the writings of the Greek author Homer, with<br />
647 total manuscripts in existence. Dr. N. T. Wright, former<br />
Canon <strong>The</strong>ologian of Westminster Abbey, remarks,<br />
“<strong>The</strong> New Testament documents are very reliable. We<br />
have better manuscript evidence for the New Testament<br />
than for any other ancient book.” 36<br />
Furthermore, when one compares the time span<br />
between the author’s date of completion and the earliest<br />
known manuscript in existence, the historical support<br />
for the New Testament is overwhelming. Caesar wrote<br />
his Gallic Wars some time before his death in 44 B.C., yet<br />
the earliest copy in existence is dated 900 A.D.—that is a<br />
gap of one thousand years. Plato wrote his Tetralogies<br />
some time before 347 B.C., yet the earliest manuscript<br />
copy is dated around 900 A.D., a time gap of 1,200 years.<br />
Contrast this to the New Testament … which was completed<br />
no later than 100 A.D., but the earliest known<br />
manuscript containing most of the New Testament is<br />
dated about 350 A.D. This means that the time gap for<br />
the New Testament is only about 250 years, and there are<br />
manuscript fragments even earlier than that.<br />
Dr. Sam Lamerson of Knox <strong>The</strong>ological Seminary<br />
observes, “It seems to me that if you throw out the reliability<br />
of the New Testament documents, one must<br />
47