An Economic Analysis of GRDC Investment in the - Grains Research ...
An Economic Analysis of GRDC Investment in the - Grains Research ...
An Economic Analysis of GRDC Investment in the - Grains Research ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.5. Attribution <strong>of</strong> Benefits from Resistance Breed<strong>in</strong>g to ACRCP<br />
There are o<strong>the</strong>r activities that could have claim to part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefits from resistance<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>in</strong>vestment by extension agencies <strong>in</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g advice regard<strong>in</strong>g cultural<br />
practices and <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> fungicides has already been excluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value<br />
<strong>of</strong> control attribution from resistance. O<strong>the</strong>r attribution claims could <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• <strong>the</strong> 14 cereal breed<strong>in</strong>g programs across Australia and <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>ir breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es, mostly <strong>in</strong> conjunction with ACRCP; <strong>the</strong>ir comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
expenditure on <strong>the</strong>se activities is likely to be significantly less than <strong>the</strong> expenditure by<br />
ACRCP.<br />
• orig<strong>in</strong>al imported germplasm, although any add<strong>in</strong>g value to such is part <strong>of</strong> ACRCP<br />
activities.<br />
• <strong>the</strong> activities and outputs <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>volved with <strong>the</strong> ACRCP.<br />
A conservative estimate <strong>of</strong> 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefits from cereal rust resistance breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Australia has been attributed to ACRCP.<br />
6.6. Benefits from Resistance Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Table 13 <strong>in</strong>tegrates <strong>the</strong> assumptions used to produce <strong>the</strong> annual benefits that can be<br />
attributed to ACRCP for its <strong>in</strong>vestment over <strong>the</strong> period 1991 to 2007.<br />
Table 13: <strong>An</strong>nual Estimated Benefits for <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>in</strong> ACRCP over <strong>the</strong> Period 1991-2007<br />
Year<br />
ended<br />
June<br />
<strong>An</strong>nual<br />
benefits<br />
produced<br />
from<br />
resistance<br />
(m $)<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
benefits that<br />
can be<br />
attributed to<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong><br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
period 1991 to<br />
2007<br />
(c)<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
resistance<br />
benefits that<br />
can be<br />
attributed to<br />
ACRCP<br />
(d)<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
resistance<br />
benefits<br />
estimated that<br />
would have<br />
occurred <strong>in</strong><br />
absence <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>GRDC</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong><br />
a national<br />
program<br />
(e)<br />
Estimated<br />
Benefit<br />
from<br />
ACRCP<br />
that can be<br />
attributed<br />
to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Investment</strong><br />
(f)<br />
1991 289 (a) 0 50 50 0<br />
1992 289 10 50 50 7.2<br />
1993 289 20 50 50 14.4<br />
1994 289 30 50 50 21.7<br />
1995 289 40 50 50 28.9<br />
1996 289 50 50 50 36.1<br />
1997 289 60 50 50 43.4<br />
1998 345 (b) 70 50 50 60.4<br />
1999 345 80 50 50 69.0<br />
2000 345 90 50 50 77.6<br />
2001 345 100 50 50 86.2<br />
________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Agtrans <strong>Research</strong> Page 20