01.12.2014 Views

Download Report - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank

Download Report - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank

Download Report - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

1<br />

Brazil contains some 3.7 million km 2 of tropical moist forest—almost<br />

27 percent of the remaining global stock. The country’s tropical<br />

forest endowment and its importance to global biodiversity are thus<br />

unparalleled in the world. Brazil is also the world’s largest consumer of<br />

tropical wood products. It has been one of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s largest<br />

borrowers, with loans totaling US$9.3 billion between 1992 and 1999. 2<br />

Finally, lending, the rate of deforestation, and policy analysis in Brazil<br />

have heavily influenced not only the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s 1991 Forest Strategy<br />

(box 1.1) but also its lending and guidelines on environmental protection,<br />

indigenous peoples, and involuntary resettlement (Redwood 1992).<br />

This review will argue that, while <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> learning and policy<br />

analysis has shaped <strong>Bank</strong> policy in the forest sector, it has had limited<br />

influence in Brazil until recently. The situation may now be changing.<br />

Endowed with abundant forest resources and competing demands on<br />

resources for development, the state and provincial governments, ranchers,<br />

and loggers have viewed forests and land conversion as sources of<br />

income and employment to be exploited for profit rather than preserved.<br />

The Government of Brazil has been too preoccupied with other pressing<br />

domestic economic and political issues to translate its environmental concerns<br />

into a concrete, actionable program. And when there are tradeoffs<br />

between immediate income or financial benefits to state and local actors<br />

and long-term environmental benefits to the nation that are difficult to<br />

detect and that either require fiscal resources or sacrificing revenues, the<br />

Government of Brazil has opted for the former. The government has also<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!