02.12.2014 Views

Doctor's actions 'dishonourable' - TUUM EST

Doctor's actions 'dishonourable' - TUUM EST

Doctor's actions 'dishonourable' - TUUM EST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Doctor's</strong> <strong>actions</strong> <strong>'dishonourable'</strong> - Sudbury Local News<br />

20/01/12 1:32 AM<br />

<strong>Doctor's</strong> <strong>actions</strong> <strong>'dishonourable'</strong><br />

Jan 19, 2012<br />

By: Sudbury Northern Life Staff<br />

Sudbury physician Dr. Miguel Bonin has lost his right to practise medicine for three months as of Jan. 16 after a series of<br />

inter<strong>actions</strong> with female patients.<br />

His certificate of registration has been suspended by the College of Physicians and Surgeons.<br />

According to information on the college's website, Bonin, who has held a medical licence since 1994 and has been under<br />

restrictions by the college since April 2010, made comments of a sexual nature to patients, including three who were pregnant.<br />

In one instance, while performing a vaginal exam on a pregnant patient in 2007, Bonin reportedly said “you like it dirty, you like it<br />

rough,” and also said to her, “I became this kind of doctor so I could see pretty women in my office.”<br />

Bonin also reportedly asked another pregnant patient during a 2007 exam how often she has sex with her husband and how many<br />

times she climaxes. While being educated on breastfeeding, Bonin reportedly told her she was well endowed and has a very nice<br />

cup size.<br />

The college's discipline committee found during a Jan. 16 hearing that Bonin “committed an act of professional misconduct, in that<br />

he engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practise of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would<br />

reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.”<br />

Besides his certificate of registration being suspended, Bonin, who does not currently have a practice location, must be monitored<br />

by another doctor under a variety of circumstances, including during physical examinations of female patients.<br />

If he acts as a surgical assistant, “he must be in the presence of a regulated health professional throughout the entirety of the<br />

encounter with the female patient.”<br />

He must also submit to unannounced inspections of his office, practice, and patient charts by a college representative “for the<br />

purposes of monitoring and enforcing his compliance with the terms of this order.”<br />

Bonin is to appear before the college to be reprimanded, and must pay the college “costs in the amount of $7,300 within 90 days of<br />

this order.”<br />

Posted by Arron Pickard<br />

© 2012 Laurentian Media Group<br />

http://www.northernlife.ca/printarticle.aspx?id=57013<br />

Page 1 of 1


The Sudbury Star<br />

22/04/12 1:18 AM<br />

« Back<br />

Local doctor being investigated<br />

Posted 1 year ago<br />

Restrictions have been placed on the practice of Sudbury family physician Dr. Miguel Bonin after two female<br />

patients have stepped forward with allegations of sexual abuse.<br />

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario has posted the following explanation on its website:<br />

"It is alleged that Dr. Bonin sexually abused two patients, and committed acts relevant to the practice of<br />

medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded as disgraceful,<br />

dishonourable or unprofessional."<br />

Until his hearing before the college's Discipline Committee, Bonin, who has been practising as a family physician<br />

since the mid-1990s and delivers babies, can only meet with his female patients in the presence of a monitor,<br />

approved by the college. This monitor is required to log all of the doctor's encounters with female patients. As<br />

well, a representative from the college can drop in unannounced at any time to inspect his office.<br />

These restrictions were put in place as of April 29. While the information can be found under the physician's<br />

name on the college's website, The Sudbury Star only became aware of the allegations after a reader sent an e-<br />

mail directing the newspaper to a link on the website.<br />

"What is occurring, we have completed the investigation and made a referral of specified allegations relating to<br />

Dr. Bonin, referred to the college's discipline committee," explained KathrynClarke, Sr. Communications<br />

Coordinator for the college. "This referral (to the discipline committee) was made toward the end of March,<br />

March 23rd."<br />

No date has been set for the hearing. The college won't reveal when the patients, known as A and B, came<br />

forward.<br />

The Notice of Hearing document lists some of the allegations. Patient A was with Bonin from 2003 to 2008.<br />

During their patient-physician relationship, he allegedly engaged in "touching, fondling, and kissing Patient A's<br />

breasts and making comments of a sexual nature to Patient A."<br />

Patient B was under his care for a year, from 2007 to 2008. During this time he is alleged to have been "making<br />

comments of a sexual nature."<br />

Should he be found guilty, there are various disciplines that the college can employ. They range from revoking<br />

his certificate which allows him to practise to taking it away for a period of time to imposing terms and conditions<br />

on his ability to practise.<br />

He could also be required to appear before a panel to be reprimanded. Financial penalties can include a fine of<br />

$35,000 to the Ministry of Finance, payments to cover the patients' care under one of the college's program, or<br />

covering the college's expenses related to the case.<br />

"I do not know whether the complainants have been in touch with the police," said Clarke.<br />

"It would be up to the complainants to decide whether they want to proceed with a separate process. We<br />

administer the investigative here, and where warranted a discipline process to determine whether or not action<br />

needs to be taken affecting the doctor's ability to process."<br />

Greater Sudbury Police were contacted to see if they were also investigating the doctor. They agreed to look into<br />

it, however, did not return The Star's phone call to confirm or deny whether an investigation has been initiated by<br />

press time.<br />

The son of former MP Raymond Bonin, Miguel made headlines in January 2007 editions of The Sudbury Star for<br />

his criticism of the state of the Sudbury Regional Hospital's facilities, specifically an operating room at Memorial<br />

Hospital.<br />

At the time Bonin said he had delivered about 150 babies and occasionally assisted with surgeries.<br />

"Services are not as good as they should be," he said, because doctors and nurses work "in a 50-year-old<br />

institution that's falling apart."<br />

Bonin was referring to Operating Room 3 at the hospital's Memorial site, which he said had four large holes in<br />

the ceiling that could pose a health hazard if dust fell through them.<br />

He said the operating tables are also antiquated and difficult to angle properly for medical procedures.<br />

He wanted hospital president and chief executive officer Vickie Kaminski and hospital board chair Gisele<br />

Chretien to tell the ministry and Sudbury MPP Rick Bartolucci: "We have a problem in Sudbury."<br />

However, Kaminski said that Bonin had never alerted the hospital directly about the problem, but rather had<br />

taken his complaint directly to the media.<br />

Bonin is listed in the phone book as working at the address of the Brady Clinic, but an employee there said he<br />

has not worked at the clinic for about a year.<br />

Copyright © 2012 The Sudbury Star<br />

http://www.thesudburystar.com/PrintArticle.aspx?e=2666132<br />

Page 1 of 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!