mutual defence organization - TUUM EST
mutual defence organization - TUUM EST
mutual defence organization - TUUM EST
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
’<br />
President s report<br />
PRESIDENT'S REPORT<br />
MAINTAINING TRADITION IN<br />
THE FACE OF CHANGE<br />
The year 2000 is now history and we are entering a new century and a<br />
new millennium. In 2001, the CMPA celebrates its 100th anniversary and<br />
a century of service to the doctors of Canada.<br />
Surveys tell us that our members value highly the assistance provided to<br />
them by the CMPA. We must not rest on our laurels, but rather strive to<br />
maintain our tradition of excellence. We must move into the 21st century<br />
looking to expand and improve on what we have done for the past 100 years.<br />
In the past year, your Council and CMPA staff undertook an extensive<br />
strategic planning exercise that laid out some exciting plans for the future<br />
designed to keep the CMPA on the cutting edge of technical advancement<br />
and at the forefront in the provision of medical malpractice protection for<br />
the doctors of Canada.<br />
Landmark change<br />
On January 1, 2001 a landmark change occurred with the implementation<br />
of regional rating. For this purpose the country has been divided into<br />
three regions: Ontario, Quebec, and the remaining provinces and<br />
territories. Members' fees are now calculated based on the true regional<br />
costs of providing medical malpractice protection, as well as by type of<br />
work. This change was made necessary when, for the first time, costs<br />
were analyzed on a regional basis and significant cost differences among<br />
regions were identified. In the interest of fairness, Council decided to<br />
move to regional fees. This decision produced dramatic increases in<br />
membership fees for Ontario, primarily reflecting the higher cost of<br />
settlements and court awards in that province. In Quebec the converse<br />
was true as fees were substantially lowered. The rest of Canada remained<br />
almost unchanged.<br />
To mitigate the sizable increases in Ontario, a three-year<br />
memorandum of understanding was drawn up between the Ontario<br />
government, the Ontario Medical Association and the CMPA in which<br />
it was agreed that the fee increases would be phased in over the next<br />
three years; in exchange, the Ontario government would provide<br />
significant subsidies, eliminating the need for up-front payments and the<br />
potential for serious cash-flow problems, especially for doctors in the high<br />
risk specialties. All parties agreed to look seriously at ways to reduce the<br />
cost of settlements and court awards through tort reform and risk<br />
management. These measures must be invoked quickly if a further<br />
medical malpractice crisis in Ontario in 2004 is to be averted.<br />
In Quebec, members are generally pleased with the significant fee<br />
reduction in their province. They have also indicated that they value the<br />
extensive protection provided by the CMPA. Meanwhile, the Quebec<br />
government continues to explore the possibility of a government-run<br />
medical malpractice program for Quebec doctors. It is our sincere wish<br />
that Quebec doctors will be able to remain with the CMPA and continue<br />
to benefit from the experience and expertise we have shared with them<br />
for so many years.<br />
Future directions<br />
For 100 years the CMPA has been a strong national association, admired<br />
and respected by medical malpractice protection providers around the<br />
world. It is my hope that this<br />
tradition of excellence will<br />
continue unaltered into the<br />
new century.<br />
For 100 years the CMPA<br />
has been a strong national<br />
association, admired and<br />
respected by medical<br />
malpractice protection<br />
providers around the world.<br />
In the past year your<br />
Council, executive and CMPA<br />
staff have worked very hard on<br />
your behalf. They have faced<br />
many difficult decisions and I<br />
believe they have made them<br />
wisely and with the continued<br />
best interest of the membership<br />
as their primary concern. Some<br />
decisions and strategic advances<br />
have involved sizeable financial commitment. I believe however that<br />
4