25.12.2014 Views

Expression Cloning of noggin, a New Dorsalizing Factor Localized ...

Expression Cloning of noggin, a New Dorsalizing Factor Localized ...

Expression Cloning of noggin, a New Dorsalizing Factor Localized ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cell<br />

838<br />

lower than the quantity needed for axis rescue <strong>of</strong> ventralized<br />

embryos by injection. However, translational or<br />

posttranslational control might normally enhance the activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>noggin</strong> protein on the dorsal side, so large amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> transcript may need to be injected into ventralized embryos<br />

to overcome reduced activity.<br />

To test whether <strong>noggin</strong> is required for normal development,<br />

its expression or activity must be eliminated experimentally.<br />

We have demonstrated a correlation between<br />

ventralization <strong>of</strong> the embryo and elimination <strong>of</strong> zygotic <strong>noggin</strong><br />

expression, but the amount <strong>of</strong> maternal mRNA is unaffected<br />

in ventralized embryos, and <strong>noggin</strong> mRNA is present<br />

in the ventral half <strong>of</strong> the cleaving embryo. Whether<br />

protein expression or activity is affected in ventral cells is<br />

not yet known. In principle, maternal <strong>noggin</strong> mRNA can be<br />

eliminated by oligonucleotide-mediated RNAase H digestion<br />

and the effects on development monitored (Kloc et al.,<br />

1989). Our recent cloning <strong>of</strong> the mouse homolog <strong>of</strong> <strong>noggin</strong><br />

(A. Huang, W. C. S., and R. M. H., unpublished data) will<br />

also facilitate genetic studies.<br />

Dorsal Mesodermal Patterning in Xenopus<br />

To date, mesoderm induction assays and axis-rescuing<br />

assays have identified different molecules. The mesoderm<br />

inducers include activin and fibroblast growth factor (FGF).<br />

Injection <strong>of</strong> FGF RNA has little effect on normal embryos<br />

(Kimelman and Maas, 1992) and activin mRNA injection<br />

produces only partial axes (Thomsen et al., 1990; Sokol et<br />

al., 1991). Although a concentration gradient <strong>of</strong> mesoderm<br />

inducer could in principle account for dorsal-ventral differences<br />

(Green and Smith, 1990), the discovery <strong>of</strong> distinct<br />

axis-rescuing (dorsalizing) molecules suggests a different<br />

mechanism for patterning the mesoderm. While molecules<br />

like Xwnt-8 have no inherent mesoderm-inducing<br />

activity (Christian et al., 1992) they sensitize cells to mesoderm<br />

inducers; thus, the combination <strong>of</strong> a ventral mesoderm<br />

inducer, FGF, with cells expressing Xwnf-8 results<br />

synergistically in differentiation <strong>of</strong> dorsal mesoderm (Christian<br />

et al., 1992). In preliminary experiments, we observed<br />

that animal caps exposed to <strong>noggin</strong> formed very little, or<br />

no, mesoderm on their own. However, when combined<br />

with a low level <strong>of</strong> activin, the animal caps differentiated<br />

a large amount <strong>of</strong> dorsal mesoderm (A. Knecht and<br />

W. C. S., unpublished data). Therefore, wnt mRNAs and<br />

<strong>noggin</strong> appear to have similar properties as dorsalizing<br />

factors that sensitize cells to mesoderm inducers.<br />

A requirement for the dorsalizing class <strong>of</strong> molecules in<br />

the embryo is also suggested by the observation that ventral<br />

animal cap tissue exposed to high concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

activin cannot form notochord or anterior neural tissues<br />

(Sokol and Melton, 1991; Bolce et al., 1992); in contrast,<br />

dorsally derived cells can respond to activin to form these<br />

structures. In the embryo the pattern <strong>of</strong> the mesoderm<br />

could be generated by a uniform distribution <strong>of</strong> mesoderm<br />

inducers in the marginal zone that is acted on by a local<br />

source <strong>of</strong> dorsalizing factor such as a wnt or <strong>noggin</strong> (reviewed<br />

by Kimelman et al., 1992).<br />

Experimental<br />

Procedures<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> Xenopus Embryos<br />

Xenopus embryos were prepared as described previously (Condie and<br />

Harland, 1967). Embryos were staged according to the table <strong>of</strong> Nieuwkoop<br />

and Faber (1967). Ventralized embryos were produced by UV<br />

irradiation with a Stratalinker (Stratagene), and dorsalized embryos<br />

were produced by treatment with LiCl (Smith and Harland, 1991).<br />

Isolation and Sequencing <strong>of</strong> <strong>noggin</strong> cDNA<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the size-selected plasmid cDNA library from stage<br />

11 LiCI-treated embryos has been described previously (Smith and<br />

Harland, 1991). In vitro RNA synthesis, injection assay for dorsal axis<br />

rescue, and sib selections were also done as described previously<br />

(Smith and Harland, 1991). A slightly different protocol was used in<br />

plating bacteria for preparation <strong>of</strong> template plasmid DNAs from the<br />

sib-selected pools. As before, agarose plate cultures were used to<br />

prepare plasmid DNAs from pools <strong>of</strong> 100,000 to 1,000 clones per pool.<br />

This was done in order to ensure that particular clones did not become<br />

greatly overrepresented, as would be more likely in liquid cultures.<br />

However, for pools <strong>of</strong> 100 clones agarose plates with 100 colonies<br />

were first grown overnight. Replica plates with ten impressions from<br />

the original plates were then made, grown overnight, and used to<br />

prepare template DNA. Pools <strong>of</strong> ten were produced first by picking and<br />

growing small liquid cultures <strong>of</strong> the 100 individual colonies from the<br />

original plate <strong>of</strong> the active pool <strong>of</strong> 100 clones. These cultures were then<br />

pooled into ten pools <strong>of</strong> ten clones, while reserving some <strong>of</strong> each single<br />

clone for later expansion and assay.<br />

To test for the presence <strong>of</strong> Xwnf-8 or <strong>noggin</strong> sequences in library<br />

pools, 5 Kg <strong>of</strong> DNA from each pool was digested with EcoRl and<br />

EcoRV, which released the cDNA inserts from the plasmid vector.<br />

Blots made from the samples after electrophoresis on a 1% agarose<br />

gel were hybridized with Xwnt-8 and <strong>noggin</strong> probes.<br />

The nucleotide sequence <strong>of</strong> both strands <strong>of</strong> the isolated <strong>noggin</strong><br />

cDNA clone was determined by the dideoxy termination method<br />

(Sanger et al., 1977) using modifiedT7 DNApolymerase(US Biochemical<br />

Company). Deletions were prepared in sequencing templates by<br />

both restriction enzyme and exonuclease Ill digestion (Henik<strong>of</strong>f, 1967).<br />

RNA Isolation and Analysis<br />

Total RNA was isolated from embryos and oocytes by a small-scale<br />

protocol described previously (Condie and Harland, 1967). Oocytes<br />

and blastula stage embryos were fixed in 96% ethanol plus 2% acetic<br />

acid prior to dissection. The dissected tissues were then rinsed twice<br />

in 100% ethanol before homogenization.<br />

Samples containing either the total RNA equivalent <strong>of</strong> 2.5 embryos<br />

or approximately 2 ug <strong>of</strong> poly(A)’ RNA were analyzed by Northern<br />

blotting as described previously (Smith and Harland, 1991; Condie and<br />

Harland, 1967). Random primed DNA probes were prepared from a<br />

1323 bp fragment <strong>of</strong> <strong>noggin</strong> cDNA from the EcoRl site at nucleotide<br />

-63 to an EcoRV site that lies in the vector immediately 3’ to the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cDNA. Other probes used in the present study (Xenopus c-sfc<br />

and EFla) have been described previously (Hemmati-Brivanlou et al.,<br />

1991; Krieg et al., 1969).<br />

RNAase protection assays were done using a protocol detailed previously<br />

(Melton et al., 1964) with minor modifications (C. Kintner, Salk<br />

Institute, La Jolla, CA). A <strong>noggin</strong> cDNA exonuclease Ill deletion clone<br />

(clone 5.5, see Figure 2A) having a deletion from the S’end to nucle<strong>of</strong>ide<br />

363 was used as a template for synthesizing RNA probes. The<br />

template DNA was linearized by EcoRl restriction enzyme digestion,<br />

and a 463 base antisense RNA incorporating =P was synthesized with<br />

T7 RNA polymerase. A 367 base antisense EFia RNA probe was used<br />

as a control for amount <strong>of</strong> RNA per sample (Krieg et al., 1969). Probes<br />

were gel purified prior to use.<br />

In Situ Hybridization<br />

The procedure described by Frank and Harland (1991) and detailed in<br />

Harland (1991) was used with minor modifications. After fixation and<br />

storage, the embryos were checked to ensure that the blastocoel and<br />

archenteron were punctured. Care was taken to puncture the residual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!