25.12.2014 Views

Appreciative-Leadership

Appreciative-Leadership

Appreciative-Leadership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4<br />

The Evaluation Story: <strong>Appreciative</strong> Organisation, <strong>Appreciative</strong> <strong>Leadership</strong> and <strong>Appreciative</strong> Inquiry<br />

The Tracker Group: sub-set of 23 of the 91 delegates<br />

• The tracker group was a random sample of the Study Group of 91<br />

• At the end of Phase 3 of the programme, we randomly selected 30 delegates to be involved in the tracker<br />

group<br />

• Some people chosen decided not to attend the group and some left the organisation, resulting in 23 delegates,<br />

5 in clinical roles and 18 in non-clinical roles<br />

• Each tracker was paired with a facilitator from FMA<br />

• Trackers had calls once every six weeks from July 2012 to May 2013<br />

• The evaluation sheet for each call consisted of qualitative and quantitative information<br />

The Evaluation Process<br />

Delegates were informed about the evaluation process in the pre-programme reading. At the first workshop,<br />

a briefing was held about the “attributed” nature of the evaluation process. In terms of the pre-, end and postprogramme<br />

questionnaires, FMA can identify the delegates. However, they are not identified in any report except<br />

by a number. The latter applies to the delegate line managers.<br />

The process differed for the “Tracker Group”. This group was a random stratified sample of 23 delegates, made<br />

up of 5 clinical leaders and 18 non-clinical leaders. This additional evaluation took the form of 4-6 telephone calls<br />

over the period using the same core areas of questioning as the other questionnaires. These call records were<br />

then thematically analysed. This group gave their permission in writing, via email, to be named in the report and<br />

for their narrative around the next iteration of their Action Research Project to be shared.<br />

Evaluation Response Rate<br />

• On average, 89 per cent of delegates and 61 per cent of line managers completed the end of programme<br />

questionnaire<br />

• On average, 75 per cent of delegates and 69 per cent of line managers completed the post-programme<br />

questionnaire<br />

• For the Study Group, 100 per cent of delegates and 79 per cent of line managers completed the preprogramme<br />

questionnaire<br />

• For the Study Group, 90 per cent of delegates and 70 per cent of line managers completed the end of<br />

programme questionnaire<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!