Appreciative-Leadership
Appreciative-Leadership
Appreciative-Leadership
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 4<br />
The Evaluation Story: <strong>Appreciative</strong> Organisation, <strong>Appreciative</strong> <strong>Leadership</strong> and <strong>Appreciative</strong> Inquiry<br />
The Tracker Group: sub-set of 23 of the 91 delegates<br />
• The tracker group was a random sample of the Study Group of 91<br />
• At the end of Phase 3 of the programme, we randomly selected 30 delegates to be involved in the tracker<br />
group<br />
• Some people chosen decided not to attend the group and some left the organisation, resulting in 23 delegates,<br />
5 in clinical roles and 18 in non-clinical roles<br />
• Each tracker was paired with a facilitator from FMA<br />
• Trackers had calls once every six weeks from July 2012 to May 2013<br />
• The evaluation sheet for each call consisted of qualitative and quantitative information<br />
The Evaluation Process<br />
Delegates were informed about the evaluation process in the pre-programme reading. At the first workshop,<br />
a briefing was held about the “attributed” nature of the evaluation process. In terms of the pre-, end and postprogramme<br />
questionnaires, FMA can identify the delegates. However, they are not identified in any report except<br />
by a number. The latter applies to the delegate line managers.<br />
The process differed for the “Tracker Group”. This group was a random stratified sample of 23 delegates, made<br />
up of 5 clinical leaders and 18 non-clinical leaders. This additional evaluation took the form of 4-6 telephone calls<br />
over the period using the same core areas of questioning as the other questionnaires. These call records were<br />
then thematically analysed. This group gave their permission in writing, via email, to be named in the report and<br />
for their narrative around the next iteration of their Action Research Project to be shared.<br />
Evaluation Response Rate<br />
• On average, 89 per cent of delegates and 61 per cent of line managers completed the end of programme<br />
questionnaire<br />
• On average, 75 per cent of delegates and 69 per cent of line managers completed the post-programme<br />
questionnaire<br />
• For the Study Group, 100 per cent of delegates and 79 per cent of line managers completed the preprogramme<br />
questionnaire<br />
• For the Study Group, 90 per cent of delegates and 70 per cent of line managers completed the end of<br />
programme questionnaire<br />
57