Tender for the Programme - South West Catchments Council
Tender for the Programme - South West Catchments Council
Tender for the Programme - South West Catchments Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DRAFT<br />
<strong>South</strong> <strong>West</strong> Regional NRM Strategy – Ancillary Document<br />
5.6.2.11 Recreation areas 3 2 0.5 5<br />
5.6.2.12 Public dams 3 2 0.5 5<br />
5.6.2.13 Drainage system 3 2 0.5 5<br />
5.6.2.14 “Utility” reserves 3 2 0.5 5<br />
5.6.2.15 Tim's Thicket Reserve 3 0.5 3<br />
5.6.2.16 Tamala Limestone Karst system 3 3 0.5 6<br />
5.6.2.17 WALGA regional corridors 3 3 0.5 6<br />
5.6.3.1 Carpet python 1 3 0.5 4<br />
5.6.3.4 Existing project works 1 2 1.0<br />
5.6.3.2 Freshwater mussels 1 2 0.5 3<br />
5.6.3.3 Private dams 1 2 0.5 3<br />
5.7 Individual Submissions<br />
Community members interested in NRM throughout <strong>the</strong> region were asked to fill out ei<strong>the</strong>r an Excel<br />
spreadsheet or an online survey (see also Section 6.2). The latter was conducted between 4 th February<br />
and 31 st March 2011. In all, 34 valid 3 responses were received. The <strong>for</strong>mat of <strong>the</strong> survey is shown in<br />
Appendix 3.<br />
The results are summarised below. Feedback:<br />
Nice survey.<br />
I believe we need to halt logging in areas of high conservation (regrowth) value around <strong>the</strong> Wellington<br />
National Park. I know we need <strong>the</strong> wood resource <strong>for</strong> industry but <strong>the</strong> value of those trees in <strong>the</strong><br />
ground outweighs <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong>m <strong>for</strong> that purpose when approached from a balanced sustainability<br />
perspective. Erosion, salinity, habitat loss, atmospheric carbon, and one of <strong>the</strong> fastest drying areas in<br />
<strong>the</strong> world - when will <strong>the</strong>y get it Chopping down native <strong>for</strong>est in that catchment really should stop.<br />
I feel <strong>the</strong> SWCC in going <strong>for</strong>ward needs to be more strategic and broaden its focus beyond <strong>the</strong> 'asset<br />
management' investment model. There is great capacity in new industry development that has large<br />
external NRM benefits [such as bioenergy from woody perennials] to deliver cost efficient long term<br />
and scale appropriate change. SWCC needs to streng<strong>the</strong>n it's partnership relationships with groups<br />
that have well aligned interests. Given 85% of <strong>the</strong> region is dryland farmed I believe <strong>the</strong> funding<br />
direction can be better targeted to build land use change to stop leakage from cleared land of water,<br />
dissolved salts and o<strong>the</strong>r industrial products. Orientation of investment going <strong>for</strong>ward will be better<br />
attacked from a strong sustainable community needs focus and targeted actions that have multiple<br />
benefits.<br />
Have recently moved to Roelands in southwest. Would like to be actively involved in bush<br />
regeneration or protecting what we have left with relation to flora and fauna. What groups in southwest<br />
are actively doing something about this.<br />
The team who are working in SWCC and dealing with <strong>the</strong> upper blackwood are doing an excellent job<br />
despite <strong>the</strong> unusual funding parameters <strong>the</strong>y're faced with. Let's hope more funds are available in<br />
future CfoC business plans & funding rounds to directly support locally based NRM's again, and to<br />
continue implementing sustainable agriculature projects and Groundworks projects but to meet<br />
objectives that more closely relate to landholder's major concerns such as salinity, soil health &<br />
erosion, pest control and water quality enancement - in a nut-shell sustainable agriculture! That is,<br />
profitable farming with protection of <strong>the</strong> land in mind.<br />
3<br />
Valid responses refer to those that were ei<strong>the</strong>r fully or partially completed. In total, 69 responses were sent in, but had no<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation and <strong>the</strong> 37 invalid responses were discarded.<br />
169