26.12.2014 Views

Tender for the Programme - South West Catchments Council

Tender for the Programme - South West Catchments Council

Tender for the Programme - South West Catchments Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRAFT<br />

<strong>South</strong> <strong>West</strong> Regional NRM Strategy – Ancillary Document<br />

Carnaby’s and Red-tailed Black<br />

Cockatoos; migratory shorebirds;<br />

all native freshwater crayfish and<br />

some native freshwater fish (incl.<br />

pouched lamprey).<br />

TECs (Community types 3c, 7, 8,<br />

9, 18 and 19).<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r ecological communities (7<br />

including <strong>the</strong> White Mangrove).<br />

Various wetlands, including<br />

Leschenault Estuary, Kemerton<br />

wetland chain and billabongs<br />

along Collie River.<br />

Eastern estuary nature reserves.<br />

Dryandra Reserve.<br />

Migratory shorebirds.<br />

Remnant vegetation.<br />

Microbial mats (Lake Preston).<br />

Mt Chudalup<br />

Native fauna<br />

Native flora<br />

Peat swamps<br />

Yeagarup Dunes<br />

Ecosystem Solutions (2009) refined this in<strong>for</strong>mation, assigning priority ranking on <strong>the</strong> basis of 38 criteria in<br />

<strong>the</strong> following five groupings:<br />

Richness (2 criteria);<br />

Rarity (22 criteria);<br />

Distinctiveness (3 criteria);<br />

Representativeness (9 criteria); and<br />

Naturalness (2 criteria).<br />

Eight bio-landscapes were <strong>the</strong>n identified as <strong>the</strong> highest value biodiversity assets in <strong>the</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>West</strong> NRM<br />

region that would protect priority fauna and/or flora species/communities, in addition to rare and/or<br />

endangered vegetation associations. A fur<strong>the</strong>r 11 assets of secondary priority were also identified that<br />

contained only priority fauna and/or flora species.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> current strategy, aquatic biodiversity has been separated out from terrestrial biodiversity, as aquatic<br />

fauna and flora have generally been under-represented in past documents and are subject to different<br />

issues and management options. Indeed, aquatic biodiversity assets haven’t been identified as a specific<br />

<strong>the</strong>me area at ei<strong>the</strong>r State, regional or catchment level, but a number of priority assets are listed in various<br />

documents that can be included in this <strong>the</strong>me area. They include:<br />

All “Critically endangered”, “Endangered” and “Estuarine dependent” aquatic species.<br />

Aquatic fauna including all native freshwater fish and crayfish, with priority given to Margaret River<br />

freshwater crayfish, Dunsborough freshwater crayfish, Balston’s Pygmy Perch and <strong>the</strong> lamprey eel.<br />

Very little is known about most aquatic species, so this list will undoubtedly be expanded at various levels<br />

as time goes on.<br />

4.1.2 Previously identified threats to <strong>the</strong> region’s terrestrial biodiversity<br />

The following threats were identified as key threats <strong>for</strong> biodiversity in <strong>the</strong> six IBRA regions represented in<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>West</strong> (State NRM Office 2007, Ecosystem Solutions 2009 – high-level threats are shown in<br />

bold):<br />

Climate change;<br />

Dieback (Phytophthora spp);<br />

Decreasing rainfall (drought);<br />

Fire (including inappropriate fire management regimes);<br />

Environmental weeds (Category A) and introduced animals (cats, European fox, rabbits);<br />

Problem species (introduced and native – European Honey Bee, Kookaburra, Minahs, Galahs,<br />

Corellas);<br />

Habitat fragmentation and/or isolation;<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!