30.12.2014 Views

a study on the performance of limestone roughing filter - ePrints@USM

a study on the performance of limestone roughing filter - ePrints@USM

a study on the performance of limestone roughing filter - ePrints@USM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

suspended particles which are larger than <strong>the</strong> pore size <strong>of</strong> <strong>filter</strong> media. Figure 2.3<br />

illustrates <strong>the</strong> screening mechanisms in <strong>roughing</strong> <strong>filter</strong>. The smallest pore size is<br />

roughly taken as <strong>on</strong>e sixth <strong>of</strong> gravel size. Thus, it is feasible that a 2 mm diameter<br />

media could strain out particles larger than 330 μm in size. Since most suspended<br />

particles travelling in water are not larger than pore size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> media, it could not be<br />

removed by screening mechanisms. However, <strong>the</strong> pore sizes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> media<br />

progressively decrease due to particle depositi<strong>on</strong> and bi<strong>of</strong>ilm growth. Thus <strong>the</strong><br />

enhanced screening has been attributed to previously removed particles in <strong>roughing</strong><br />

<strong>filter</strong>s. Therefore, screening becomes more effective as <strong>the</strong> pore size <strong>of</strong> medium<br />

decreases and thus more effective in capturing particles that are even smaller in size<br />

than <strong>the</strong> initial pore size (Weber-Shirk and Dick, 1994; Wegelin, 1996).<br />

Figure 2.3: Screening <strong>of</strong> Particle <strong>on</strong> Filter Media (Source: Wegelin, 1996)<br />

Sedimentati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>the</strong> main solid separati<strong>on</strong> process in <strong>roughing</strong> <strong>filter</strong>s.<br />

Sedimentati<strong>on</strong> occurs when <strong>the</strong> mass density <strong>of</strong> particle is greater than that <strong>of</strong> water<br />

and its settling velocity causes <strong>the</strong> particle to deviate from <strong>the</strong> flow path and settle <strong>on</strong>to<br />

<strong>the</strong> media surface. Thus, sedimentati<strong>on</strong> is probably more important for suspended<br />

particulates removal. Figure 2.4 illustrates <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> sedimentati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>filter</strong><br />

media. To achieve adequate solid removal efficiencies, <strong>roughing</strong> <strong>filter</strong>s need to be<br />

operated under laminar flow c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (Wegelin, 1996).<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!